Smoked tails ticket?!
it doesn't look that much different from the '94 one though.
07-01-06, 08:58 PM
#61
Full Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Blackwood,NJ
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
F Cops
I F'in hate cops, they got nothin better to do then to write people like us dumb F'in tickets. I get pulled over constantly for no front liscence plate and loud exhaust. I think everyone should carry guns with them and every time they get pulled over for someting as pointless as "smoked tail lights" they should shoot the F'in cops right in the face! Sooner or later the cops are going to stop pullin us over people for stupid reasons!!!!!!!!!
07-01-06, 09:23 PM
#63
Punkrockin JUNGLIST
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Diamond Bar, CA
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by BLKTOPTRVL
I have the 93 and 94 brochures if the OP needs them. I could 'scan' and post the photos if you like; let me know.
but the photos help, i've been looking all over for a booklet
07-01-06, 10:27 PM
#65
Rotary Freak
Originally Posted by dgeesaman
The 93 looks just like the 94, except all the numbers say '93'. 
And the cover is just a silvery background rather than a pic.
Dave
And the cover is just a silvery background rather than a pic.
Dave
07-01-06, 10:30 PM
#66
Rotary Freak
Originally Posted by SINxSELEKTAH
i thought they would be scanned
but the photos help, i've been looking all over for a booklet
but the photos help, i've been looking all over for a booklet
07-01-06, 11:38 PM
#67
Originally Posted by DCrosby
FDnewbie, That must be because Traffic court is not a trial by jury. Since I just had to do my jury service, and the judge ended up rambling about Burden of Proof, and the fact that an officer has no "Edge" on testimony just because he's an officer.
-DC
-DC
Originally Posted by antiSUV
Calm down Ice Cube.
That's a good one hehe
07-02-06, 12:45 AM
#69
sexy no jutsu
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: planet arium
Posts: 1,578
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by FDeez
What vehicle code violation was this listed as? I want to look it up.
cvc 24600(e) Taillamps shall be red in color and shall be plainly visible
from all distances within 500 feet to the rear except that taillamps
on vehicles manufactured after January 1, 1969, shall be plainly
visible from all distances within 1,000 feet to the rear.
*scratches head*
07-02-06, 01:16 AM
#70
Doc-1
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: alabama
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Entertainment Value………PRICELESS.
Not sure why the car brings out the worst in the "boys" but it seems to. I got a reckless drive ticket in a parking lot. The cop had heard someone spinning their tires and gave me a ticket. It had to me I had the "hot car". Odd part was my youngest son was in the car and told the cop that it was someone else. Did no good. I got the “street racer” so it had to be me!!
It was fortunate that the car left tire marks in the parking lot. Took some pictures of the skinny tires and showed that my 245/45 16’s could not have left such a small mark. Now if you think showing the evidence to the lower courts does any good read on.
I went to “kangaroo court” got a GUILTY…. as the cop… could not have been “wrong”. That was fun. Told the Judge that I was appealing the ruling. Did the appeal thing twice. Got to a real court of law. Told the State that I wanted a trail by jury. Now boys, that cost the state real money. It is about 15,000 or so to seat a jury, get the DA in and the Cop there and the “professional tire guy” and such. Got the court date (that took 18 months) and the trail lasted 5 minutes.
DA makes his little speech about street racing and the safety issue facing the community and how all you guys out there are mother killers and father killers and 7-11 robbers,,,it was wonderful. He stated that they had pictures of the tire marks and that this irresponsible father was out street racing in a parking lot, endangering people, wildlife of all kinds, other people and that I was a public nuisance and a terrible father figure.
I only had a few pictures as evidence. One of my tires. One of the marks. One of the marks left by my tires. Rulers were in all of them. Lawyer entered them.
Did not even take the stand.
The Judge looked at my pictures asked the DA for his pictures of the “Crime sceine” all 27… 8 by 10 photographs with rulers and tire marks and such.
Judge called the “home team up front” and asked a few questions?
How in the heck could my tires make such skinny marks????
Tire guy said no, not possible. Cop said no...too. Now he did not want to say no but the tire expert had already said not possible.
What was I out for all this? I had to front the court costs and the fines and a Lawyer’s time until I got the “NOT GUILTY” about 1100 or so bucks. I got all my money back except for the lawyer cost 200.00. Needed to have someone enter the evidence in a court of law.
Entertainment Value………PRICELESS. The Jury, Ahhh the Jury. Someday will go into the impact it made on those common citizens.
May I suggest a similar path. You need just one witness. A Mazda dealer. He will testify on the smoked lens as OEM.
Some days it is really good to be old, know the system, have the money and have the time to go fishing once in awhile.
It was fortunate that the car left tire marks in the parking lot. Took some pictures of the skinny tires and showed that my 245/45 16’s could not have left such a small mark. Now if you think showing the evidence to the lower courts does any good read on.
I went to “kangaroo court” got a GUILTY…. as the cop… could not have been “wrong”. That was fun. Told the Judge that I was appealing the ruling. Did the appeal thing twice. Got to a real court of law. Told the State that I wanted a trail by jury. Now boys, that cost the state real money. It is about 15,000 or so to seat a jury, get the DA in and the Cop there and the “professional tire guy” and such. Got the court date (that took 18 months) and the trail lasted 5 minutes.
DA makes his little speech about street racing and the safety issue facing the community and how all you guys out there are mother killers and father killers and 7-11 robbers,,,it was wonderful. He stated that they had pictures of the tire marks and that this irresponsible father was out street racing in a parking lot, endangering people, wildlife of all kinds, other people and that I was a public nuisance and a terrible father figure.
I only had a few pictures as evidence. One of my tires. One of the marks. One of the marks left by my tires. Rulers were in all of them. Lawyer entered them.
Did not even take the stand.
The Judge looked at my pictures asked the DA for his pictures of the “Crime sceine” all 27… 8 by 10 photographs with rulers and tire marks and such.
Judge called the “home team up front” and asked a few questions?
How in the heck could my tires make such skinny marks????
Tire guy said no, not possible. Cop said no...too. Now he did not want to say no but the tire expert had already said not possible.
What was I out for all this? I had to front the court costs and the fines and a Lawyer’s time until I got the “NOT GUILTY” about 1100 or so bucks. I got all my money back except for the lawyer cost 200.00. Needed to have someone enter the evidence in a court of law.
Entertainment Value………PRICELESS. The Jury, Ahhh the Jury. Someday will go into the impact it made on those common citizens.
May I suggest a similar path. You need just one witness. A Mazda dealer. He will testify on the smoked lens as OEM.
Some days it is really good to be old, know the system, have the money and have the time to go fishing once in awhile.
07-02-06, 01:28 AM
#71
Doc, I loved the story The only danger is, if you don't have such a rock-solid case like yours, and you ask for a jury, YOU'RE paying the bill for the jury... 
Oh and btw, I noticed the same...the lower courts can be very biased and unjust. Every time I've appealed a case to the Circuit Court, I've won.
~Ramy
The only danger is, if you don't have such a rock-solid case like yours, and you ask for a jury, YOU'RE paying the bill for the jury... Oh and btw, I noticed the same...the lower courts can be very biased and unjust. Every time I've appealed a case to the Circuit Court, I've won.
~Ramy
07-02-06, 11:57 AM
#73
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Voorhees, NJ
Posts: 506
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Doc-1
Not sure why the car brings out the worst in the "boys" but it seems to. I got a reckless drive ticket in a parking lot. The cop had heard someone spinning their tires and gave me a ticket. It had to me I had the "hot car". Odd part was my youngest son was in the car and told the cop that it was someone else. Did no good. I got the “street racer” so it had to be me!!
It was fortunate that the car left tire marks in the parking lot. Took some pictures of the skinny tires and showed that my 245/45 16’s could not have left such a small mark. Now if you think showing the evidence to the lower courts does any good read on.
I went to “kangaroo court” got a GUILTY…. as the cop… could not have been “wrong”. That was fun. Told the Judge that I was appealing the ruling. Did the appeal thing twice. Got to a real court of law. Told the State that I wanted a trail by jury. Now boys, that cost the state real money. It is about 15,000 or so to seat a jury, get the DA in and the Cop there and the “professional tire guy” and such. Got the court date (that took 18 months) and the trail lasted 5 minutes.
DA makes his little speech about street racing and the safety issue facing the community and how all you guys out there are mother killers and father killers and 7-11 robbers,,,it was wonderful. He stated that they had pictures of the tire marks and that this irresponsible father was out street racing in a parking lot, endangering people, wildlife of all kinds, other people and that I was a public nuisance and a terrible father figure.
I only had a few pictures as evidence. One of my tires. One of the marks. One of the marks left by my tires. Rulers were in all of them. Lawyer entered them.
Did not even take the stand.
The Judge looked at my pictures asked the DA for his pictures of the “Crime sceine” all 27… 8 by 10 photographs with rulers and tire marks and such.
Judge called the “home team up front” and asked a few questions?
How in the heck could my tires make such skinny marks????
Tire guy said no, not possible. Cop said no...too. Now he did not want to say no but the tire expert had already said not possible.
What was I out for all this? I had to front the court costs and the fines and a Lawyer’s time until I got the “NOT GUILTY” about 1100 or so bucks. I got all my money back except for the lawyer cost 200.00. Needed to have someone enter the evidence in a court of law.
Entertainment Value………PRICELESS. The Jury, Ahhh the Jury. Someday will go into the impact it made on those common citizens.
May I suggest a similar path. You need just one witness. A Mazda dealer. He will testify on the smoked lens as OEM.
Some days it is really good to be old, know the system, have the money and have the time to go fishing once in awhile.
It was fortunate that the car left tire marks in the parking lot. Took some pictures of the skinny tires and showed that my 245/45 16’s could not have left such a small mark. Now if you think showing the evidence to the lower courts does any good read on.
I went to “kangaroo court” got a GUILTY…. as the cop… could not have been “wrong”. That was fun. Told the Judge that I was appealing the ruling. Did the appeal thing twice. Got to a real court of law. Told the State that I wanted a trail by jury. Now boys, that cost the state real money. It is about 15,000 or so to seat a jury, get the DA in and the Cop there and the “professional tire guy” and such. Got the court date (that took 18 months) and the trail lasted 5 minutes.
DA makes his little speech about street racing and the safety issue facing the community and how all you guys out there are mother killers and father killers and 7-11 robbers,,,it was wonderful. He stated that they had pictures of the tire marks and that this irresponsible father was out street racing in a parking lot, endangering people, wildlife of all kinds, other people and that I was a public nuisance and a terrible father figure.
I only had a few pictures as evidence. One of my tires. One of the marks. One of the marks left by my tires. Rulers were in all of them. Lawyer entered them.
Did not even take the stand.
The Judge looked at my pictures asked the DA for his pictures of the “Crime sceine” all 27… 8 by 10 photographs with rulers and tire marks and such.
Judge called the “home team up front” and asked a few questions?
How in the heck could my tires make such skinny marks????
Tire guy said no, not possible. Cop said no...too. Now he did not want to say no but the tire expert had already said not possible.
What was I out for all this? I had to front the court costs and the fines and a Lawyer’s time until I got the “NOT GUILTY” about 1100 or so bucks. I got all my money back except for the lawyer cost 200.00. Needed to have someone enter the evidence in a court of law.
Entertainment Value………PRICELESS. The Jury, Ahhh the Jury. Someday will go into the impact it made on those common citizens.
May I suggest a similar path. You need just one witness. A Mazda dealer. He will testify on the smoked lens as OEM.
Some days it is really good to be old, know the system, have the money and have the time to go fishing once in awhile.
No offense dude, but I'm call BS on your whole story. Mainly because you CANNOT get a jury trial for a traffic ticket.
07-02-06, 01:21 PM
#74
Originally Posted by nickpapagiorgio
No offense dude, but I'm call BS on your whole story. Mainly because you CANNOT get a jury trial for a traffic ticket.
~Ramy
The ignorance is strong in this thread. I love it.