Yikes! ..... Well, I never expected that out of this thread..... I expected a tussle but not battle of the mods!

P.S. I agree with you Mahjik, and I am currently non-seq.

 

Didn't cewrx7r1 and Mahjik both agree on the same thing? How did this drama start?

If you look at the post history, they agree that there is a tad bit more power at top end. cewrx7r1 insists that there IS a LITTLE.
Mahjik agrees that there MIGHT be a little but it is so very LITTLE it is not worth mentioning. His real point is that it might not be worth it without legitimate proof.

...why the drama?


can't we all just get along?...without rice of course.

 

sounds deeper than that?

 

I can't believe you don't believe there would not be any gains from removing the many valves you leave when going poor man's. Do you believe by removing them you remove turbulence that exists because of them. If you say yes then you are saying that there is a gain between poor man's and full non-seq. Why do you think people port match any joint in the intake or the exhaust. Its to reduce turbulence. Decrease turbulence increase flow. Increase flow you increase horsepower. To me this is a given, which part of physics do you not understand. That's why when I saw the poor man's non-seq, I skipped it as to me this would be a waste of time if your not seeing the full benefits of going non-sequential. Butt dyno's don't mean anything. Its hard to judge a 5 hp or 200 rpm spool gain when you are sitting at 350 to the fly.

 

Re-read my messages in this thread.