3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Sequential Vs Non-Sequential Turbos

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-12-02, 07:50 AM
  #1  
Junior Member

Thread Starter
 
Panic7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Cyprus
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sequential Vs Non-Sequential Turbos

I am trying to sort out if non-sequential turbo cars are faster than sequential.

My view is that non-sequential turbo systems are less restrictive and trouble free. Main concern is boost creeps because of lack of backpressure.

On the other hand cars with sequential turbochargers produce a little bit less hp above 4500rpm due to restrictive ports but they produce more power on low end band from 3000-4500rpm.

So overall which is faster and safer?

I would like to have everybodys view on this matter.
Old 11-12-02, 07:53 AM
  #2  
Full Member

 
Domestic513's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Middletown, Ohio (Cincinnati area)
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Are you talking about a completely stock FD with the non-seq. mod vs. a completely stock FD without the non-seq mod?
Old 11-12-02, 08:17 AM
  #3  
Junior Member

Thread Starter
 
Panic7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Cyprus
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No talking about two modified cars. Both of them with air filters, I/C, D/P, M/P, modified ECU, boost controllers, fuel pumps etc.
Old 11-12-02, 09:09 AM
  #4  
Classy

iTrader: (17)
 
evot23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 6,900
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
From the very limited dyno sheets I have seen...it appears that the nonsequential setups provide more torque and not necessarily more hp.

This is very very subjective info. Take it with a grain of salt.
Old 11-12-02, 09:44 AM
  #5  
Mr. Links

iTrader: (1)
 
Mahjik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 27,595
Received 40 Likes on 26 Posts
The power is the same. The power curve is what is different between the two setups.
Old 11-12-02, 10:12 AM
  #6  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
Marshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Edwards, CA
Posts: 1,023
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The power is NOT the same. Proper Non sequentials have less restriction in the exhaust path and the potential to make more hp once they spool.
Old 11-12-02, 10:32 AM
  #7  
Mr. Links

iTrader: (1)
 
Mahjik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 27,595
Received 40 Likes on 26 Posts
Originally posted by Marshall
The power is NOT the same. Proper Non sequentials have less restriction in the exhaust path and the potential to make more hp once they spool.
That's *IF* they do the full non-seq conversion that they have that potential. However, most people don't do the real conversion.
Old 11-12-02, 10:54 AM
  #9  
Full Member

 
ttRx7racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Eugene Oregon
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rikki,
Did you ever post on how to fully set it up? not just the diagram. is on a website somewhere? thanks

scott
Old 11-12-02, 11:49 AM
  #10  
Classy

iTrader: (17)
 
evot23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 6,900
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
www.dontbearikki.com

how to section...pretty well laid out.
Old 11-12-02, 04:32 PM
  #11  
WTB** Very Low Miles 94-95

 
artguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Tejas
Posts: 3,298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yeah..but I will remind you that rikkis power is for track use.

big streetport plus non seq equals lots o laggo.

right rikki?

hehehehe

if you are running a drag car then non seq rules...if you are using it as a stoplight to stoplight city driving racer you will want the response of the seq system...at least I do.


j
Old 11-12-02, 04:34 PM
  #12  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
Marshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Edwards, CA
Posts: 1,023
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That is nowhere near the full setup! Go to www.scuderiaciriani.com and into how to for non-sequential. Trev and Goble did a great write up of it. You're not non sequential until you've removed butterflies and doors and welded stuff :-)
Old 11-12-02, 04:44 PM
  #13  
WTB** Very Low Miles 94-95

 
artguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Tejas
Posts: 3,298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
your not non seq til you have no low end either.

Old 11-12-02, 04:53 PM
  #14  
Senior Member

 
Silver7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: GA
Posts: 652
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've said this before and I will say it again. If your sequential system is working fine then I would recommened staying with it. If you are having problems with it then do the conversion. I ran an 11.66 @ 118 MPH with my stock seq turbos, IC, MP, DP, CB, intake and M2 ECU. There are a lot of non seq cars that can't run that time.
You will get noticeable more lag with non seq. I definitely had to downshift more often when I eventually converted to non seq just before I went single.
Old 11-12-02, 05:25 PM
  #15  
Senior Member

 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: LA
Posts: 573
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
i have a non-seq. setup on my FD! and i regret it! it's a very cheap and stupid way to get horses! and i think it causes to much boost! and ***** up your vacs. i seriously recommend you don't go w/ non seq. unless you're ready to rebuilt your engine or got lots of money for mods! but if you're going to keep it quite stock i say you leave it the way it is because there's probably a reason the turbo was made seq. and not non-seq.!
Old 11-12-02, 11:43 PM
  #16  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
Marshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Edwards, CA
Posts: 1,023
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
but if you're going to keep it quite stock i say you leave it the way it is
Dude, did you even read anything about it before you did it? IE If you car is stock or near stock DON'T do it.

LOL, it causes too much boost. YGBSM!
Old 11-13-02, 12:49 AM
  #17  
Senior Member

 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Washington
Posts: 614
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This debate will go on and on. Everyone has different opnions. try the poor mans and see how you like it. you'll defintely get more turbo lag, but you'll have greater potential with you non seq then with your seq set up.
Old 11-20-02, 08:42 PM
  #18  
Classy

iTrader: (17)
 
evot23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 6,900
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Been nonsequential for a short while. Finding that my profec B is holding boost at 10 (low) and 13 (high) pretty consistently.

Not getting the boost creep others have encountered.

Mods
Catback
DP
Hiflo cat
CF M2 intake
Pettit LSMIC
Profec B
Power FC
Upgraded FP
1300 secondaries
BOP for everything
Old 11-20-02, 08:58 PM
  #19  
Mr. Links

iTrader: (1)
 
Mahjik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 27,595
Received 40 Likes on 26 Posts
Originally posted by evot23
Been nonsequential for a short while. Finding that my profec B is holding boost at 10 (low) and 13 (high) pretty consistently.

Not getting the boost creep others have encountered.

Mods
Catback
DP
Hiflo cat
CF M2 intake
Pettit LSMIC
Profec B
Power FC
Upgraded FP
1300 secondaries
BOP for everything
Your hi-flo cat gives enough back pressure to keep boost creep away.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
streetlegal?
New Member RX-7 Technical
13
03-17-22 02:46 PM
Queppa
New Member RX-7 Technical
8
09-02-18 09:53 AM
Skeese
Adaptronic Engine Mgmt - AUS
65
03-28-17 03:30 PM
rxmiles
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
9
08-24-15 02:07 PM



Quick Reply: Sequential Vs Non-Sequential Turbos



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:32 AM.