3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

safe max rpm?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 17, 2003 | 09:22 PM
  #1  
turbogarrett's Avatar
Thread Starter
0 lbs of boost
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,261
Likes: 1
From: wisconsin
safe max rpm?

i was wondering what would be a safe maximum rpm to run. i have a pettit streetported motor, pfc, non seq and all the bolt ons. the reason i ask is that the one time i have drag raced the car this year, i was hitting the 8100 rpm redline right before the end of the 1/4 mile at about 110 mph, which forced me to coast through or shift to 4th which didn't help. i was running only 9 lbs of boost at the time, so maybe it won't be an issue when it's tuned at 14 lbs.
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2003 | 09:30 PM
  #2  
rotaryrex7's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
Not sure what's safe but last week at the track I accidentally shifted from 3rd to second at 8,000 rpm with no damage. I haven't figured out what that would have pushed the rpm to but I'd rather not know. If you have a stock ECU you'll hit fuel cut which is not a good thing.

Jim
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2003 | 10:20 PM
  #3  
fastcarfreak's Avatar
3rd motors a charm I hope
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,054
Likes: 0
From: Central New York
Dave from KDR told me that they run rotary engines 9-10k rpms all the time, he says they love to be reved, and not to baby the car because of carbon build up.
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2003 | 10:21 PM
  #4  
Wargasm's Avatar
Weird Cat Man
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,868
Likes: 3
From: A pale blue dot
If you really let the clutch all the way out, it would have sent the engine RPM up to around 11,500 RPM.

My guess is that you "felt" something might be wrong and didn't fully release it, so your actual RPM may have been more like 9500 or something if you pushed the clutch back in right away before it grabbed.

Brian
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2003 | 10:41 PM
  #5  
Rx-7$4$me's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,338
Likes: 1
From: Chicago IL
seriously it depends on your mods the most IMO. for example a mostly stock car the power starts to seriously drop after 7k rpms, so there almost isnt a point unless your trying to stay within a certain RPM range.

once you get more mods, the motor can breathe much better at those RPMS, and the power doesnt trail off.
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2003 | 12:09 AM
  #6  
kyle@insight's Avatar
Dont like it? I dont care
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 931
Likes: 0
From: Gold's Gym
Originally posted by Rx-7$4$me
seriously it depends on your mods the most IMO. for example a mostly stock car the power starts to seriously drop after 7k rpms, so there almost isnt a point unless your trying to stay within a certain RPM range.

once you get more mods, the motor can breathe much better at those RPMS, and the power doesnt trail off.
He listed his mods, which were pretty substantial.

You'll be having to go to 4th anyway when you go to 14psi so just shift at 8k
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2003 | 12:26 AM
  #7  
Rx-7$4$me's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,338
Likes: 1
From: Chicago IL
oh I know, I was refering to everyone who had questions about when to shift, so they could decide based on their mods or dyno plots.

Steve
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2003 | 05:21 PM
  #8  
turbogarrett's Avatar
Thread Starter
0 lbs of boost
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,261
Likes: 1
From: wisconsin
Originally posted by fastcarfreak
Dave from KDR told me that they run rotary engines 9-10k rpms all the time, he says they love to be reved, and not to baby the car because of carbon build up.
9 or 10 k rpm's! i think i'll take it to 8500 at the most. i doubt my 100k mile twins would like that. there didn't seem to be any loss in power at 8100 unlike when i was sequential and many mods ago.
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2003 | 05:44 PM
  #9  
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
From: Edwards AFB, CA
Racing Beat claims 8500rpm is the magic number. anything more and then you need rotor side clearanceing. rotor and eccentric shaft balancing and race bearings. One thing with high reving the rotary is the gear on the rotors can back out and lock up on the side housing. You can get it perminately installed with a machining process that uses a lock ring. but I wont get into that. Get the Racing Beat catolog and read through the tech tips.
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2003 | 06:49 PM
  #10  
turbogarrett's Avatar
Thread Starter
0 lbs of boost
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,261
Likes: 1
From: wisconsin
thanx joe, that's what i was looking for.
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2003 | 07:52 PM
  #11  
Rx-7$4$me's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,338
Likes: 1
From: Chicago IL
Even if you go to 8500 rpms you need the mods to support it, otherwise your power will trail off horribly.
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2003 | 11:17 PM
  #12  
ZeroBanger's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,323
Likes: 1
From: Buckhead
I have about 80 runs at the dragstrip and I always shift at 8000 RPM.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2003 | 01:16 AM
  #13  
Fatman0203's Avatar
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,639
Likes: 0
From: MIA
I always shift at 8000 too, but LoL just cause I read this thread I went to see how far I can go, w00t w00t hit fuel cut at 8700 or something "oh well "
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jeff20B
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
73
Sep 16, 2018 07:16 PM
Snook
Single Turbo RX-7's
39
Oct 4, 2015 08:47 PM
Erosangel
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
6
Sep 18, 2015 10:28 PM
The1Sun
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
7
Sep 18, 2015 07:13 PM
localized
New Member RX-7 Technical
3
Sep 16, 2015 12:18 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:46 PM.