RX-7 with Supra engine?
#26
An rb motor is in the future of my FD... i am so pleased with my sr i just did about 20 minutes more tuning and made 375hp at 19 psi....completely stock, head never lifted off.... after i max out this setup the rb is on the way... good luck in whatever engine you decide to put in and do not listen to all these ricers that can not even change thier own oil..
Shaun
PS: i have less than 4k in my swap... everything was made in house
Shaun
PS: i have less than 4k in my swap... everything was made in house
#28
Senior Member
okay here's my 1 million dollar thought! if you wanna do a 2jz-gte swap! might as well trade in your car for a sc and do the swap on that! or just buy a damn supra! i derno the reason rx7's r so special if for it's rotary and twin turbo! so....
#29
I'm a CF and poop smith
Originally posted by TwinTriangles
For some reason I was under the assumption that we were on a "rotary enthusiast" website...
God!! Where am I ?
For some reason I was under the assumption that we were on a "rotary enthusiast" website...
God!! Where am I ?
P.S. anyone know how much a RB26dett weights???
#30
Rotary Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: las vegas, NV
Posts: 936
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm gonna find out the weight on the the RB26 very very soon I think trying to actually fit and work the AWD will be the biggest thing in engine swaps in a looooong time.
I've got too many ideas and not enough FD's. Anyone wanna donate an FD to the cause? I hope this guy doesn't flake on me that i'm buying 2 more FD's from. Neither have motor's so they'll be perfect for the Frankenstein experiments
I've got too many ideas and not enough FD's. Anyone wanna donate an FD to the cause? I hope this guy doesn't flake on me that i'm buying 2 more FD's from. Neither have motor's so they'll be perfect for the Frankenstein experiments
#32
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
iTrader: (52)
So why not through a V8 or Supra motor in a 1st gen. or 2nd gen.,...how about an RX2 or 3 or 4????? I see more and more guys that like FD's caring less about what makes the FD better then all generations and more about looks. The FD is one of the very best handling street cars ever made. The rotary helps make that possible with exact 50/50 weight distribution. As far as reliability, The piston engine allows more room for reliability error from the owner. I've seen many rotarys in excess of 200k and running strong. But many do not have the time or intrest to baby their car with the special needs of a rotary. Note: Of course, turbo rotarys are more prone to failure.
In any case, Good luck to all.
In any case, Good luck to all.
#33
Rotary Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: las vegas, NV
Posts: 936
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Bridgeported
Why would you want to put AWD in it?
Why would you want to put AWD in it?
#36
a supra making 950 whp on stock internals?! I SERIOUSLY doubt many people are stupid enough to try that. 950whp is what? like... 1200 or so hp at the flywheel? a 2jz wouldn't last long making that kind of hp on stock internals. I'm very very very skeptical about that claim. I do believe most supra guys strongly recommend upgrading the internals at 600 or so hp. You're claiming that the stock internals are good for TWICE that.
#37
Do you want me to find some dynos to prove it to you? Just a quick stop over at the Supra forums and I'll have them if you want. I"m not saying everyone does it, or you can drive down the street and find someone... but there are guys around that have over 900 rwhp on stock internals and have been running like that for a while (over a year) with no failures yet... not sure how reliable it woudl be though.. can't be that reliable. Remember, Toyota is known for overbuilding their engine internals more than any other company is.
Putting AWD and an iron block I6 into the car would cut down on that 900 lb weight difference between the FD and R34 pretty quick! I would estimated a RB26 & AWD FD swap (done properly) would bring the stock weight up to 3400 lbs. So basically you have a Supra. Hmmm.
AWD is just useless additionaly weight and one more thing to go wrong. Helps you for your launch, then hurts you after that.
Putting AWD and an iron block I6 into the car would cut down on that 900 lb weight difference between the FD and R34 pretty quick! I would estimated a RB26 & AWD FD swap (done properly) would bring the stock weight up to 3400 lbs. So basically you have a Supra. Hmmm.
AWD is just useless additionaly weight and one more thing to go wrong. Helps you for your launch, then hurts you after that.
#38
there are a ton of 2j's making over 700 on stock internals we personally help set one up that made 770wheel, and i am sure a few have made over 900.... also your driveline loss calculation is a little off it is roughly 1111 at the fly with 950 at the wheels
Shaun
Shaun
#39
Generally drivetrain losses vary depending on the cars power (I can't explain why).
000 - 400 rwhp = 16-17 %
400 - 800 rwhp = 14-16 %
800 - XXX rwhp = 12-14 %
I've heard rumours that some extremely high powered drag cars (like 1500 rwhp) only lose 11% through the drivetrain, but can't confirm. this.
I still don't understand why there would be a variation dependant on the engine's horsepower. I would think it would be a set value for a certain drivetrain... like one rx-7 would lose the same % as another identical one with more power.
000 - 400 rwhp = 16-17 %
400 - 800 rwhp = 14-16 %
800 - XXX rwhp = 12-14 %
I've heard rumours that some extremely high powered drag cars (like 1500 rwhp) only lose 11% through the drivetrain, but can't confirm. this.
I still don't understand why there would be a variation dependant on the engine's horsepower. I would think it would be a set value for a certain drivetrain... like one rx-7 would lose the same % as another identical one with more power.
#40
I'm a CF and poop smith
Originally posted by XLR8
So why not through a V8 or Supra motor in a 1st gen. or 2nd gen.,...how about an RX2 or 3 or 4????? I see more and more guys that like FD's caring less about what makes the FD better then all generations and more about looks. The FD is one of the very best handling street cars ever made. The rotary helps make that possible with exact 50/50 weight distribution. As far as reliability, The piston engine allows more room for reliability error from the owner. I've seen many rotarys in excess of 200k and running strong. But many do not have the time or intrest to baby their car with the special needs of a rotary. Note: Of course, turbo rotarys are more prone to failure.
In any case, Good luck to all.
So why not through a V8 or Supra motor in a 1st gen. or 2nd gen.,...how about an RX2 or 3 or 4????? I see more and more guys that like FD's caring less about what makes the FD better then all generations and more about looks. The FD is one of the very best handling street cars ever made. The rotary helps make that possible with exact 50/50 weight distribution. As far as reliability, The piston engine allows more room for reliability error from the owner. I've seen many rotarys in excess of 200k and running strong. But many do not have the time or intrest to baby their car with the special needs of a rotary. Note: Of course, turbo rotarys are more prone to failure.
In any case, Good luck to all.
The 50/50 weight distribution is still valid for a fd with a V8/LS1 seeing as they only weight 50 lbs more then a stock fd engine and all that weight is before the front axles. I doubt that you will lose any handling (especially with brian's bumpsteer correction fix). Secondly, the 50/50 weight distribution is only good when at a dead stop/not on the gas or brakes which you will probally be doing so in a corner so that does not really make a difference. FD with a V-8= Ultra relible (engine as well as tranny), great handling, great braking, very good looking, light weight and extreamly fast (both in acceleration and top end) car. What more could you want? (Note the cost is not that bad either )
#42
Rotary Enthusiast
Join Date: May 2002
Location: San Diego
Posts: 971
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by silvr94r2
I'm gonna find out the weight on the the RB26 very very soon I think trying to actually fit and work the AWD will be the biggest thing in engine swaps in a looooong time.
I've got too many ideas and not enough FD's. Anyone wanna donate an FD to the cause? I hope this guy doesn't flake on me that i'm buying 2 more FD's from. Neither have motor's so they'll be perfect for the Frankenstein experiments
I'm gonna find out the weight on the the RB26 very very soon I think trying to actually fit and work the AWD will be the biggest thing in engine swaps in a looooong time.
I've got too many ideas and not enough FD's. Anyone wanna donate an FD to the cause? I hope this guy doesn't flake on me that i'm buying 2 more FD's from. Neither have motor's so they'll be perfect for the Frankenstein experiments
#44
Rotary Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: las vegas, NV
Posts: 936
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Chronos
how much do you pay for non functional FD's?? I was considering making a dedicated track only FD...until I found out about the Diasio 962R, but I still might.
how much do you pay for non functional FD's?? I was considering making a dedicated track only FD...until I found out about the Diasio 962R, but I still might.
So i've been pretty lucky with all my FD experiences.
I've still got over $100k into the 94 R2 and her FD even with the low buying price. That number will go up considerably here in the near future as we near the firing up phase of the 2.
#45
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Jersey
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks guys for your inputs.
Bridgeported -- you are wrong a supra motor can only support upto 550 HP on stock internals.
Red-Rx7 -- Thanks for your input, it helped alot. I'm planning on building some of these things by myself, and try to modify parts that are already out there to mate the 2JZ-GTE.
For all you guys that disagree it's your choice, but I and you know that if this turns out well it will be a pretty bad *** car. Now, I just have to find some places where I can get an RX7 with either a blown motor or no motor, with no frame damage, and decent body, and I have to find a 2JZ-GTE engine and tranny.
Like Red-Rx7 said "Need a computer to run the car" can I just hook up an AEM ECU to the Supras wiring harness and use that to run the car? Im planning to use both the RX7/Supra wiring with a custom wiring kit from Painless Wiring. Also, What rearend should I use? Supra or RX7? Something else?
Thanks guys
Bridgeported -- you are wrong a supra motor can only support upto 550 HP on stock internals.
Red-Rx7 -- Thanks for your input, it helped alot. I'm planning on building some of these things by myself, and try to modify parts that are already out there to mate the 2JZ-GTE.
For all you guys that disagree it's your choice, but I and you know that if this turns out well it will be a pretty bad *** car. Now, I just have to find some places where I can get an RX7 with either a blown motor or no motor, with no frame damage, and decent body, and I have to find a 2JZ-GTE engine and tranny.
Like Red-Rx7 said "Need a computer to run the car" can I just hook up an AEM ECU to the Supras wiring harness and use that to run the car? Im planning to use both the RX7/Supra wiring with a custom wiring kit from Painless Wiring. Also, What rearend should I use? Supra or RX7? Something else?
Thanks guys
Last edited by rksupra; 01-31-03 at 08:08 PM.
#46
Originally posted by rksupra
Thanks guys for your inputs.
Bridgeported -- you are wrong a supra motor can only support upto 550 HP on stock internals.
Thanks guys for your inputs.
Bridgeported -- you are wrong a supra motor can only support upto 550 HP on stock internals.
Shaun
#48
ok RK just use the rx7 rear end and get a new drive shaft made it will be cheaper, considering you can get the drive shaft made for like $200-300 well at laest that is what you can get it made down here in texas for.
#49
LS6 Convert
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,827
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My one thought for this increasingly stupid argument. GRM tested a stock 2JZ-GTE engine and made a little over 700RWHP with just some JE heads. While true you could make 950RWHP on stock internals, it won't last for long. Because you're doing it through boost and not by increasing displacement, lift, or duration; I guarantee that you'll spin a couple bearings, crack a head, or crack a connecting rod before you approach "it's been reliable for xxxxx". Toyota engineers might have been gung-ho about this engine ... but 300% tolerance? .... HA, can I have some of that crack you been smoking?