3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

RX-7 and 300ZX - Help?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-02-07, 08:46 AM
  #51  
Mr. Links

iTrader: (1)
 
Mahjik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 27,595
Received 40 Likes on 26 Posts
Originally Posted by sandplasma
You must have misread somewhere. I never mentioned that it would hamper me getting my own place later on .\
I didn't misread anything. You should re-read my post.
Old 07-02-07, 08:59 AM
  #52  
Drive to the unknown.

 
Comet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Missoula, Montana
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by sandplasma
Hi everyone, I am new and this is my first post.
I come from the 300ZXClub forums actually. Just sold my 300ZX NA and I'm looking to buy a 300ZX Twin Turbo or a 3rd Gen RX7 TT. I am not very familiar with the rotary but know how it works. I know very little about the RX7 though.

Would anyone give me a quick walk-through? I saw an FD TT on Ebay going for around 13K. Is this a good representative of the value of these cars at the moment? How much power do they put down? How responsive are they to mods?

Coming from 300ZX I know that the TT is very responsive to mods and can be taken to 360HP with no problem. How are these ?

Also, is maninteneance going to be a big issue with these cars?

I'm still exploring and making my decision. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks!
Hey man, Congrats on 2 great choices on cars! Myself I have actually owned both a Z and FD, and right off, Both have similar problems with the cooling systems. (that's really the big one). As far as comparison, what would you use the car for? The RX-7 was designed as an Exotic Japanese sports car to combat European handling and speed. Whereas the 300ZX took it's place as a Grand Touring Sports/Luxury (kinda). The Z will have more torque and cushy factor, but the 7 is a blast to drive.
Old 07-02-07, 09:06 AM
  #53  
Drive to the unknown.

 
Comet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Missoula, Montana
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by sandplasma
You must have misread somewhere. I never mentioned that it would hamper me getting my own place later on . I don't want to spend more than a certain amount because I don't want to be paying for it for 2+ years. This is because I want to return to school and don't want to bother with payments until I'm out again. Anyway, this will be in a year at least. As for the car, I do my own work so labor costs are out (and that should be well over 40% of the costs)

Anyway, I'd appreciate if we get back to the topic. This is not a discussion of my financial state. Thanks for the advice.



Really!? I find this very hard to believe but then I noticed you live in California. Chicago 300s are very few and hard to come by. RX-7s even less but IMO don't look as exotic.

As for the S2000, not really a fan. I like the 350Z and evolution(not as much as the 300ZX or the RX-7) but they are way too common. Like it was mentioned above, I seek a nice and unique car. No SRT either.
also to chime into this, if you're looking at affordablilty as much as I'm gonna get flamed for this..... look into a 1st gen DSM. They are easy to find, aside the timing belt maintenance the motors damn near bullit proof.... True they are a common car, but in trims with AWD (GSX TSi Laser RS) You can have a lot of fun with out being locked into "ricer groupings" Parts are cheap, and thank god it's not a damned Honda.
Old 07-02-07, 09:17 AM
  #54  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
sandplasma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Comet
Hey man, Congrats on 2 great choices on cars! Myself I have actually owned both a Z and FD, and right off, Both have similar problems with the cooling systems. (that's really the big one). As far as comparison, what would you use the car for? The RX-7 was designed as an Exotic Japanese sports car to combat European handling and speed. Whereas the 300ZX took it's place as a Grand Touring Sports/Luxury (kinda). The Z will have more torque and cushy factor, but the 7 is a blast to drive.
I'm not a hardcore racing fanatic and I do not abuse any of my cars so the use will be purely for the weekend or whenever I have time off in the week. I have a 200SX I use to drive to and from work (40 miles each way). I would be interested in doing some autocross but that's about it. I would increase its performance slowly to get better response in the expressway.

As for the DSM, they are nice cars. I even considered one before buying my 300ZX NA but I immediately went back to the Z when I saw it standing in front of me.

I'm not really looking into affordability as much as fun. I set my cap at around 13K + or - I know I can purchase a nicely used 02-03 WRX with this money but I'm not a big fan of the look.

It will definitely be Z if not FD.

It seems the community doesn't really want me to buy one. (is this so that more will be left for you guys? heh) I asked for an opinion and I'm sure I got the main message stating that they are expensive to maintain cars...but I doubt MAZDA designed their cars to break every 20K miles if driven properly...so I'm not too worried about this. As I said, I have the 200SX and I wouldnt mind waiting a couple of weeks for a part (especially in the winter) should the car break down.

The main factor now is what comes up first that fits my $ bracket.
Old 07-02-07, 09:40 AM
  #55  
Full Member

 
CareBear's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Norway
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You guys are sooo spoiled, here in Norway you won't get a decent below $33k.

sandplasma, I don't think you'd still be around here on the forum if you hadn't already decided on the FD. If the option is Z versus FD, and you already have had an NA Z, it's time to move on to the sexy and exotic FD.

I doubt I would have bought the FD unless I could have paid it in cash. I didn't want any mortage on the car as I knew it was going to cost to own it (repairs and modifications). The car ran fine the 2 first months, after which I started having some serious coolant leak issues (at which time I didn't know anything about the FD or it's problems) and then I started having exhaust leakage.

Got the local Mazda shop to replace gaskets, which helped the exhaust leakage for 3 hours. Yes, the car was in garage/shop for many months, got it "repaired", and I blew the engine after 3 hours. And I tell you, the $$$ (it was a lot) I paid for the "repair", was well worth the 3 hours joy of the FD.

Decided to do the R&R myself, got a local rotary expert to do the short block overhaul, and everything else I managed on my own using forums, DVD, etc. Learned a lot from the process and now I'm sure I can debug and fix smaller issues when they happen.

After all my modification the car is very rough, but it's not undriveable in the city. I love to take it for a spin downtown, gets so damn much attention. Gotta get my windows tinted, ASAP!

Paid more than $12k in repairs and modifications and I've only had the car for little more than a year. Yes, Norway is expensive. Gas prices is double of what they are in the US, and car prices are tripple.

As someone else mentioned on the forum, I'm never going to sell my FD so I don't care how much money I invest in the car. I do it for the joy of driving the FD.

Still 500km away from being able to do +4k RPM (newly overhauled engine), I have not redlined since 1st of February when the engine broke... it's to keep of the pedal. That reminds me, I'm gonna take it for a spin now! Good luck on finding your perfect FD!
Old 07-02-07, 09:52 AM
  #56  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
sandplasma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That is awesome man
How did you break the engine? Is it true that you NEED to redline this car? I've never heard this on any car. I realize these are rotary but really?
Old 07-02-07, 10:01 AM
  #57  
Drive to the unknown.

 
Comet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Missoula, Montana
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The 2 biggest enemies of the Rotary are Carbon and Detonation IMO. Redlining is a great way to burn off Carbon buildup. But any motor does need opened up every once in a while to burn the crap off of valves and such.... I run my DSM hard at least once a week either on the highway or some of our side/back roads at high rpm to clean up the valve surfaces.

The reason people are trending away from the FD for you are simple. it is a budget destroyer. A lot of us have at one point or another had to part with Rotarys at some point due to cost of parts and labor... You truly have to be DEDICATED to the 7 to keep it as Reliable as possible. And by that I mean not on fire.
Old 07-02-07, 10:07 AM
  #58  
Mr. Links

iTrader: (1)
 
Mahjik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 27,595
Received 40 Likes on 26 Posts
Originally Posted by sandplasma
Is it true that you NEED to redline this car? I've never heard this on any car. I realize these are rotary but really?
I think that's been exaggerated a little bit. What can happen is that carbon buildup on the rotors can cause hot spots. These hot spots can cause detonation. One way to combat carbon build up is running the car harder than normal. It helps burn off any deposits to keep build up off the rotors.

IMO, making sure to run decent oil and keeping up with the rest of the maintenance is more important. TBH, it's hard not to redline these cars when you drive them.
Old 07-02-07, 10:08 AM
  #59  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
sandplasma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ah ok, good to know. Have you guys heard of SeaFoam? Would this help in such situations?
Old 07-02-07, 10:12 AM
  #60  
Mr. Links

iTrader: (1)
 
Mahjik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 27,595
Received 40 Likes on 26 Posts
Originally Posted by sandplasma
Ah ok, good to know. Have you guys heard of SeaFoam? Would this help in such situations?
Once you break down a motor and try to clean it by hand, you'll have a hard time imagining if any of those techniques work. Some people use SeaFoam, other use water or ATF. Honestly, if you have carbon build up on the rotors, it's not coming off without some real work. And that's not going to happen with the rotor still in the engine.
Old 07-02-07, 10:16 AM
  #61  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
sandplasma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
damn
Old 07-02-07, 10:24 AM
  #62  
Drive to the unknown.

 
Comet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Missoula, Montana
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I will say this, I have done Engine Swaps on DSM's, RX-7's, and my 85' 300zx Turbo........ I'll never do another Z swap... EVER.
Old 07-02-07, 11:34 AM
  #63  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
sandplasma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah, I don't know about the 85 but the 90+ looks like they really really just got the engine in the car. Hardly any space for work without having to remove everything in sight.

Old 07-02-07, 06:04 PM
  #64  
Drive to the unknown.

 
Comet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Missoula, Montana
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I wouldn't dare try to squeeze my hands in that TT bay.... uh uh no way
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
alfred1976
RX-7 Audio/Visual Lounge
3
12-03-15 03:06 AM
Duc852
Introduce yourself
1
09-22-15 03:49 AM



Quick Reply: RX-7 and 300ZX - Help?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:54 AM.