3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

radiator cap

Old Sep 1, 2005 | 11:27 AM
  #1  
silver_7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 646
Likes: 0
From: Pensacola
radiator cap

how much lbs should the radiator cap be rated for? The reason I ask is because the one on the AST says that its a 13lbs cap. But the one that autozone gave me for the readiator was a 16lbs cap. Will that make a big difference on my coolant system? Or is that cap correct?
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2005 | 11:35 AM
  #2  
2FAST7S's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,887
Likes: 1
From: Carmel, NY
Originally Posted by silver_7
how much lbs should the radiator cap be rated for? The reason I ask is because the one on the AST says that its a 13lbs cap. But the one that autozone gave me for the readiator was a 16lbs cap. Will that make a big difference on my coolant system? Or is that cap correct?
If your cooling system is in good shape the higher capacity rad cap will work for you by lowering the boiling point of your coolant. In other words, dont worry its a good thing!
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2005 | 11:37 AM
  #3  
DaveW's Avatar
Racecar - Formula 2000
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,034
Likes: 370
From: Bath, OH
Originally Posted by 2FAST7S
If your cooling system is in good shape the higher capacity rad cap will work for you by lowering the boiling point of your coolant. In other words, dont worry its a good thing!
I know you meant RAISING the boiling point, keeping it from boiling so easily... I get dislexic, too, sometimes.
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2005 | 11:39 AM
  #4  
silver_7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 646
Likes: 0
From: Pensacola
ok just checking.
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2005 | 11:41 AM
  #5  
DamonB's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,617
Likes: 8
From: Dallas
When the cars were built they had 16 pound caps. After the recall Mazda installed 14 pound caps if I recall correctly. I use a 14 pound cap.

Running the coolant at higher pressures will allow higher temps without boiling at the expense of additional stress to the hoses and internal coolant seals.

Increased system pressure does not make any change in coolant temps if the water is not boiling. There is no sense in using a higher pressure cap if you don't have to.
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2005 | 11:43 AM
  #6  
Julian's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,857
Likes: 5
From: Longview, Texas
Orginal system was 1.3 bar (~19 lbs), and changed to 0.9 (~13 lbs) after a recall that included fan relay mods. Many aftermarket caps for R's are 1.1 bars (16 lbs) and some dealers amd Mazda North America itself did not change 1.3 cap in recall.
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2005 | 11:48 AM
  #7  
Retserof's Avatar
Original Owner
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 558
Likes: 87
From: America's Dairyland
The orignal FD cooling system cap was 1.2 bar, or 17.4 PSI. The recall changed it to 0.9 bar, or 13 PSI. The pressure was reduced because some cooling system components - mostly hoses and the AST, I think, couldn't handle the pressure and temperature, resulting in engine fires and a safety recall. Mazda made production line changes as they built more cars, so later ones only needed a few new parts per the recall, while earler production cars needed more new parts, including even a new water pump for some, IIRC. You can find out if Mazda's records show whether your car had the recall performed on it by asking a dealer. Mine was supposedly done by the dealer prior to sale, but it had the 1.2 bar cap on it until I noticed it. So, the dealer probably lied, charged Mazda for the recall, and didn't do it.
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2005 | 11:49 AM
  #8  
2FAST7S's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,887
Likes: 1
From: Carmel, NY
Originally Posted by DaveW
I know you meant RAISING the boiling point, keeping it from boiling so easily... I get dislexic, too, sometimes.
lol, i knew it was something like that...
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2005 | 11:50 AM
  #9  
ENFORCER's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
From: yo mama's house
Originally Posted by DamonB
When the cars were built they had 16 pound caps. After the recall Mazda installed 14 pound caps if I recall correctly. I use a 14 pound cap.

Running the coolant at higher pressures will allow higher temps without boiling at the expense of additional stress to the hoses and internal coolant seals.

Increased system pressure does not make any change in coolant temps if the water is not boiling. There is no sense in using a higher pressure cap if you don't have to.

Good post. That explains a few things that are happening with my car.
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2005 | 11:58 AM
  #10  
Julian's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,857
Likes: 5
From: Longview, Texas
Factory spec on cap was 1.15-1.45 Kg/cm2 (16.4-20.6 psi) per the FSM. Orginal caps were marked 1.3.

Read the TSB Recall 94V094000 .. items would be changed out IF sign of leakage.

Last edited by Julian; Sep 1, 2005 at 12:01 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2005 | 01:55 PM
  #11  
Retserof's Avatar
Original Owner
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 558
Likes: 87
From: America's Dairyland
Thanks Julain, I stand corrected - the original caps were 1.3 bar (not 1.2). That is about 18.85 PSI.

I saw a post years ago about some 1.1 bar Mazda radiator caps also being used on FDs.
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2005 | 05:09 PM
  #12  
David Beale's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 617
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Further, the hoses that failed causing the fires were the coolant hoses going to and from the turbos. Mine suffered that fault (happened to first owner at about 20,000 km). The car got new turbos and a new engine due to the fire. The fire is caused by glycol running onto the red hot turbo housing. Glycol burns well! Hey, it's cheaper than gas - maybe I can run the engine on it!

If you are going to use the higher pressure cap I'd reinforce the turbo coolant hoses with stainless mesh. Otherwise, I'd recommend the lower pressure caps as posted above.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
The1Sun
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
7
Sep 18, 2015 07:13 PM
gruss16
Introduce yourself
2
Sep 16, 2015 12:13 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:10 AM.