3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Purpose of side vents on aftermarket front bumpers?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-30-07, 12:47 PM
  #26  
2/4 wheel cornering fiend

 
Kento's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Pasadena, CA
Posts: 3,090
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by FDNewbie
...that's a lot of assumptions. BUT:

1) To assume they ARE far back enough is an assumption in it of itself...
The difference is that I've given some facts and knowledge to back up my assessment of your assumption. Note that I stated I never was saying outright that the RE Amemiya vent was effective. BUT:
Originally Posted by FDNewbie
...You'd be catching either a high pressure area, equalized pressure area, or the very beginning of a low pressure area (def. not as good as say, the much more forwardly located side vents on the Mazdaspeed R-Spec hood).
The underhood area is in itself a higher pressure area than most of the area above the hood, because pressure is being built up from the front intake. Thus, if it was an area of equal pressure or below, you'd still get benefits from the vent.

Originally Posted by FDNewbie
Re: the negative pressure, assuming the oil ducts are vented openly to the wheel well, and you have a normally shaped fender (not concave); would there be sufficient enough negative pressure generated to vent the air in the wheel well out of the fender vent (that's normally used for the oil cooler vent)? Assuming you enlarged the vent too... Or would that be not such a good idea, and going w/ the concave fenders is the way to go? Not sure if the former would involve too much turbulence/inadequate vent size, etc.
A wheel well by itself doesn't generate that much negative pressure, so any vent that can help evacuate air from the wheel well can't hurt in that case. The concaved fender generates a lot of turbulence as well as neg pressure, so it can go either way depending on other factors.
Old 12-30-07, 01:07 PM
  #27  
Sponsor
RX7Club Vendor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
 
FDNewbie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 13,216
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Kento
The difference is that I've given some facts and knowledge to back up my assessment of your assumption.
Easy there big guy. I'm not trying to be antagonistic at all I hope it isn't coming across that way...

Note that I stated I never was saying outright that the RE Amemiya vent was effective. BUT:

The underhood area is in itself a higher pressure area than most of the area above the hood, because pressure is being built up from the front intake. Thus, if it was an area of equal pressure or below, you'd still get benefits from the vent.
I was wondering about that as well...and from another thread where we touched on that (https://www.rx7club.com/2nd-generation-specific-1986-1992-17/any-recommendation-carbon-fiber-hood-713123/page5)/
Originally Posted by NZConvertible
I know you're just making numbers up for the sake of discussion, but I don't think many people appreciate the magnitude of the pressures we're discussing here.

The static pressures measured across the top of the hood would be in the order of a few hundred pascal's, compared to atmospheric pressure of 101,325Pa at sea level. So a measured static pressure of 250Pa (which is realistic) is only ~0.25% of atmospheric pressure. Dynamic pressure at 100mph is ~1200Pa, which is a lot higher than the static pressure but still only a small fraction of atmospheric pressure (~1.2%).
So from THAT, I understood that it would take an *enormous* amount of pressure buildup in the engine bay to vent through the high pressure zone in the rear.

A wheel well by itself doesn't generate that much negative pressure, so any vent that can help evacuate air from the wheel well can't hurt in that case.
But hopefully the fact that it isn't positive pressure is enough to improve airflow through the oil coolers...

The concaved fender generates a lot of turbulence as well as neg pressure, so it can go either way depending on other factors.
I wondered about that as well...the tradeoff between negative pressure & turbulence, as I've seen how many of the land speed cars (including the RacingBeat FD) cover the wheel wells due to the tremendous turbulence they noted from that area (and if I'm not mistaken, many of the smaller hybrid vehicles also partially cover the rear wheel wells for the same reason, because less turbulence results in better gas efficiency, yes?)
Old 12-30-07, 01:26 PM
  #28  
2/4 wheel cornering fiend

 
Kento's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Pasadena, CA
Posts: 3,090
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by FDNewbie
So from THAT, I understood that it would take an *enormous* amount of pressure buildup in the engine bay to vent through the high pressure zone in the rear.
Sorry Ramy, but you understood incorrectly. "Dynamic pressure" occurs on surfaces that are directly facing the airflow, so the "enormous" ~1200pa reading isn't at the windshield junction. And definitely not at the area we're speaking of.

Originally Posted by FDNewbie
But hopefully the fact that it isn't positive pressure is enough to improve airflow through the oil coolers...
You're talking about the difference between direct airflow from the oil coolers versus a slight negative pressure area in the wheel wells.

Originally Posted by FDNewbie
I wondered about that as well...the tradeoff between negative pressure & turbulence, as I've seen how many of the land speed cars (including the RacingBeat FD) cover the wheel wells due to the tremendous turbulence they noted from that area (and if I'm not mistaken, many of the smaller hybrid vehicles also partially cover the rear wheel wells for the same reason, because less turbulence results in better gas efficiency, yes?)
Less turbulence means less aerodynamic drag, the main goal of land speed vehicles.
Old 12-30-07, 01:40 PM
  #29  
Sponsor
RX7Club Vendor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
 
FDNewbie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 13,216
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Kento
Sorry Ramy, but you understood incorrectly. "Dynamic pressure" occurs on surfaces that are directly facing the airflow, so the "enormous" ~1200pa reading isn't at the windshield junction. And definitely not at the area we're speaking of.
Ah. Oops

You're talking about the difference between direct airflow from the oil coolers versus a slight negative pressure area in the wheel wells.
Yes yes. But I'm trying to differentiate the two. Positive pressure in front of the cooler, and negative pressure behind the cooler. You've already answered my question, but to clarify, what I was getting at was the example of a V-mount IC w/ the rear ducted & vented to a forward hood vent. That way you're maximizing flow, given the large positive pressure in front of the IC, and the large negative pressure behind it. Was curious if the wheel well would result in a similar negative pressure area, but as you said, it's slight.

Less turbulence means less aerodynamic drag, the main goal of land speed vehicles.
Yep...and better fuel efficiency for the ultra-fuel efficient hybrids.

Thanks again
~Ramy




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:27 AM.