3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Preliminary BNR Dyno Results

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 2, 2003 | 10:26 PM
  #26  
artguy's Avatar
WTB** Very Low Miles 94-95
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,298
Likes: 0
From: Tejas
he will get more power out of seventeen psi than twenty...I will bet my hat on it.

j
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2003 | 10:46 PM
  #27  
kyle@insight's Avatar
Dont like it? I dont care
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 931
Likes: 0
From: Gold's Gym
Originally posted by artguy
he will get more power out of seventeen psi than twenty...I will bet my hat on it.

j
From what I've heard they are effecient at 20psi, so I don't see how they would lose power.
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2003 | 01:08 AM
  #28  
kwikrx7's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,392
Likes: 0
From: Mechanicsburg, PA USA
I don't see the BNRs running much past 18 psi at 420-430 rwhp - 20 psi is like running the stockers at 18 psi - what's the point. 15-17 psi is definitely the efficiency range. My dyno shot up 37 rwhp from 14 to 15 psi with the BNRs

Nice numbers, Rich - with fan and temps in the 60s-70s you'll hit 400 rwhp EASILY. I'm sure your car would crap on mine on the highway. I still like the sequentials. Me and artguy stand alone I guess
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2003 | 02:19 AM
  #29  
fastcarfreak's Avatar
3rd motors a charm I hope
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,054
Likes: 0
From: Central New York
37 rwhp for 1 psi, thats crazy, i wish i had my $2150 right now!!!
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2003 | 05:25 AM
  #30  
GoodfellaFD3S's Avatar
Thread Starter
Original Gangster/Rotary!
Veteran: Army
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (213)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 30,804
Likes: 646
From: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Originally posted by DavidDeco
Didn't you do that 368 rwhp with a Hi Flow Cat too???

I'm a bit suprised as well you didn't dyno more but I've had some inconsistent readings too before.

My best was 357 w/ stockers at 14.2psi with a HF cat. I'm hoping to do better once it gets back as I have some small improvements as well as a stronger streetport now.

I'd love to see what you put out at 17psi but the case for a MP doesn't seem that pursuasive in your case.

David
Those were uncorrected #s from a Jan dyno pull in August, and Dave's hard drive crashed shortly thereafter. Point is, I never saw the damn sheet. Of course, I believe Dave, but I'm wondering how peaky the chart looked and if it might have been more than 15. Let me tell you, my 7 ismuch faster now.
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2003 | 05:29 AM
  #31  
GoodfellaFD3S's Avatar
Thread Starter
Original Gangster/Rotary!
Veteran: Army
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (213)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 30,804
Likes: 646
From: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Originally posted by rynberg
I wouldn't sweat the numbers, Rich. I'm sure you'll easily trap in the 120s.

So, when are you going to bring that beast to the Bay Area so I can see the results of the BNR/Gotham Racing/Steve Kan combo? Think of it as west coast advertising....
Did somebody say Road Trip?

Reply
Old Jul 3, 2003 | 05:42 AM
  #32  
GoodfellaFD3S's Avatar
Thread Starter
Original Gangster/Rotary!
Veteran: Army
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (213)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 30,804
Likes: 646
From: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Originally posted by vosko
i know of a car with stock twins that can hang with you

cough*boostn7*cough

congrats 367 rwhp is good!
Hello Johnny,

yeah, no doubt his car is insane.....give Kan the same # of hours tuning my car and we'll see what happens .

Oh, and it's 376
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2003 | 05:44 AM
  #33  
GoodfellaFD3S's Avatar
Thread Starter
Original Gangster/Rotary!
Veteran: Army
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (213)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 30,804
Likes: 646
From: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Originally posted by radkins
The 94 deg air was a BIG factor. I dont even bother getting on my car when its that hot out, it just feels "slow" compared to cooler temps. I think it shorted you at least 20hp.
Yeah, I'm inclined to agree. He only made 2 pulls, so I'm sure dynoing in that heat didn't hurt anything, just deflated the output.
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2003 | 05:48 AM
  #34  
GoodfellaFD3S's Avatar
Thread Starter
Original Gangster/Rotary!
Veteran: Army
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (213)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 30,804
Likes: 646
From: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Originally posted by evot23
Awesome numbers Goodfellas...I'm sure once you get YOUR hands on it, it'll be even better. Keep us posted, you brighten my day with those numbers.
Thanks, Eddie. It brightens my day as well.....helps make the days go faster out here
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2003 | 06:04 AM
  #35  
GoodfellaFD3S's Avatar
Thread Starter
Original Gangster/Rotary!
Veteran: Army
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (213)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 30,804
Likes: 646
From: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Originally posted by kwikrx7
I don't see the BNRs running much past 18 psi at 420-430 rwhp - 20 psi is like running the stockers at 18 psi - what's the point. 15-17 psi is definitely the efficiency range. My dyno shot up 37 rwhp from 14 to 15 psi with the BNRs

Nice numbers, Rich - with fan and temps in the 60s-70s you'll hit 400 rwhp EASILY. I'm sure your car would crap on mine on the highway. I still like the sequentials. Me and artguy stand alone I guess
I'm inclined to agree. Hmmm, so 37 rwhp gain from 14 to 15, what about from 15 to 17 ?

Someday you, Jason and I should line up on the highway and film the result.....of course, it could end up with us behind bars
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2003 | 07:56 AM
  #36  
Boostn7's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 867
Likes: 0
From: Union, NJ
Thumbs up Congrats Rich....

No wonder my ears were ringing........

Rich, this 90+ degree weather is killer for turbo cars and NO fan on the dyno !!!!!
with your intercooler in the engine bay it heat soaks very fast........

Your 1.07kg/cm2 is more like ~16.5psi and the BNR's should more power up 18psi easily....after 18psi gains might be very minimal. with race gas and more timing even more hp is available.

SO 400-420rwh.........just a matter of time.

That 37rwh gain from 1psi !!!!!! well.....it would be nice!!!

Rich....just get back home so we could enjoy a nice highway pull with 3-4 FDs side by side.
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2003 | 07:57 AM
  #37  
radkins's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,236
Likes: 1
From: Waiting for Indykid to catch up
Originally posted by GoodfellaFD3S
I'm inclined to agree. Hmmm, so 37 rwhp gain from 14 to 15, what about from 15 to 17 ?

Someday you, Jason and I should line up on the highway and film the result.....of course, it could end up with us behind bars
Cops can't catch you with that kind of power
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2003 | 09:17 AM
  #38  
Nuvolari's Avatar
Veni, Vidi, Vici
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,253
Likes: 1
From: Metro DC
Sweet numbers , I put down 320wr on my stage II's at 13psi, with my stock cat. Midpipe and boost controler are on the way , so I think 365-375 will be realistic for these . I do have a mild street port , running 550 primary and 1300 secondary .

It pulls like a beast, but they will have to be removed soon. I am eating oil up and its now venting out my BOV .I guess I should have waited to get these , I was one of the first to try them and it sounds like BNR has had some quality control issues with these.

End result, well I am going single GT35/40 here I come and I will laugh when I compare my dyno sheets to these BNR's 450wr here I come

Last edited by Nuvolari; Jul 3, 2003 at 09:21 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2003 | 11:00 PM
  #39  
Marshall's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,023
Likes: 0
From: Edwards, CA
Originally posted by fastcarfreak
37 rwhp for 1 psi, thats crazy
Its also physically impossible if everything else is kept the same. Even if you didn't raise the charge temp at all, the absolute max you could get on this setup with an extra 1psi is ~15.5 hp. Something had to have changed -whether it was the fuel or timing cell, dyno, etc.

Anyways, 380 rw and these little cars move! Congrats.
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2003 | 11:18 AM
  #40  
kwikrx7's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,392
Likes: 0
From: Mechanicsburg, PA USA
Originally posted by Marshall
Its also physically impossible if everything else is kept the same. Even if you didn't raise the charge temp at all, the absolute max you could get on this setup with an extra 1psi is ~15.5 hp. Something had to have changed -whether it was the fuel or timing cell, dyno, etc.

Anyways, 380 rw and these little cars move! Congrats.
Well, looking at my dyno graph, Dave made 3 pulls at 14 psi and it hit a max of 325 rwhp - next pull was at 15 psi and it went up to 357 rwhp - very next pull was 366 at 15 psi. I was having trouble with my stock diff and he changed it out for a low mileage diff and said he saw almost a 30 hp jump - he could have changed it between the 14 and 15 psi runs...I thought he did it between the 10 and 13 psi runs - I only dynoed at 278 at 10 psi but I guess this was with the bad diff.
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2003 | 11:53 AM
  #41  
IRPerformance's Avatar
Sponsor
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 11,347
Likes: 321
From: NJ
Re: Congrats Rich....

Originally posted by Boostn7
No wonder my ears were ringing........

Rich, this 90+ degree weather is killer for turbo cars and NO fan on the dyno !!!!!
with your intercooler in the engine bay it heat soaks very fast........

Your 1.07kg/cm2 is more like ~16.5psi and the BNR's should more power up 18psi easily....after 18psi gains might be very minimal. with race gas and more timing even more hp is available.

SO 400-420rwh.........just a matter of time.

That 37rwh gain from 1psi !!!!!! well.....it would be nice!!!

Rich....just get back home so we could enjoy a nice highway pull with 3-4 FDs side by side.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought 1.05 on the pfc was 15 psi and 1.15 would be 16?
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2003 | 12:57 PM
  #42  
vosko's Avatar
Just Call Me Terminator!
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 7,848
Likes: 0
From: NJ
1 kg/cm2 = 14.223 PSI
1 Bar = 14.508 PSI
1 Atmosphere = 14.696 PSI

multiply accordingly LOL

info from http://xtronics.com/reference/convert.htm

1.07 KG/CM2 = 1.07x14.223 = 15.21 PSI

1.15 KG/CM2 = 1.15x14.223 = 16.356 PSI

Reply
Old Jul 4, 2003 | 06:52 PM
  #43  
jdhuegel1's Avatar
Glug Glug Glug Burp
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,819
Likes: 0
From: Scott AFB, IL
Originally posted by Nuvolari
End result, well I am going single GT35/40 here I come and I will laugh when I compare my dyno sheets to these BNR's 450wr here I come

Bah... Dyno sheets aren't everything.
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2003 | 09:15 PM
  #44  
artguy's Avatar
WTB** Very Low Miles 94-95
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,298
Likes: 0
From: Tejas
[i]End result, well I am going single GT35/40 here I come and I will laugh when I compare my dyno sheets to these BNR's 450wr here I come [/B]

yeah...and Ill believe it when I see it. lol...
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2003 | 10:17 PM
  #45  
vosko's Avatar
Just Call Me Terminator!
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 7,848
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Originally posted by jdhuegel1
Bah... Dyno sheets aren't everything.
running your 400+ HP FD 13 times down the 1/4 mile in one hour is though. without breaking anything too!!!!
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2003 | 12:19 AM
  #46  
Boostn7's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 867
Likes: 0
From: Union, NJ
>>>Correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought 1.05 on the pfc was 15 psi and 1.15 would be 16?<<<

Well...if have a PowerFC in your car and an aftermarket boost gauge you'll know what I'm talking about.....

The PowerFC readout for boost is a bit lower then actual...when you hit 1.14-1.15kg/cm2 you're easily at 17-17.5 psi.

I hope evry PowerFC owner knows this.
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2003 | 12:37 PM
  #47  
suganuma's Avatar
no
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,295
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX / Tokyo, Japan currently
Re: Preliminary BNR Dyno Results

Originally posted by GoodfellaFD3S

Next step is to get a 3 bar map sensor and have Steve fine tune her some more, along with some minor airflow enhancements like intake hard pipes and double throttle deletion. This will all of course come after I come home from my little vacation .

take it easy guys--
you still have double throttle?? tisk tisk Rich

I dynoed 362 @ 15 psi with a cracked apex seal and C-dawg only revving it out to 7500....?? The seal let go completely a few hours later.

Hopefully I can swap out that housing and you get yours working right and we can do a little comparo constrasto on the 287 no?

btw - i forgot to tell you i got to weigh my car for my DITY move and the fat hoe weighed 2720...you ever weighed yours?
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2003 | 02:57 PM
  #48  
GoodfellaFD3S's Avatar
Thread Starter
Original Gangster/Rotary!
Veteran: Army
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (213)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 30,804
Likes: 646
From: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Re: Re: Preliminary BNR Dyno Results

Originally posted by suganuma
you still have double throttle?? tisk tisk Rich

I dynoed 362 @ 15 psi with a cracked apex seal and C-dawg only revving it out to 7500....?? The seal let go completely a few hours later.

Hopefully I can swap out that housing and you get yours working right and we can do a little comparo constrasto on the 287 no?

btw - i forgot to tell you i got to weigh my car for my DITY move and the fat hoe weighed 2720...you ever weighed yours?
Yeah, I'm sorry if I disappointed you, cadet ******** .

There was something wrong on the dyno......my power started to seriously tail off after 7200 rpms. Something about 94 degree heat and *no* air to the intake

Sure, we can make a run.....I've pulled you every other time we've raced on the highway (long time ago though)

My FD weighs right at 2700 I believe, with half a tank and full stereo, subwoofer etc.
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2003 | 04:15 PM
  #49  
suganuma's Avatar
no
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,295
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX / Tokyo, Japan currently
Re: Re: Re: Preliminary BNR Dyno Results

Originally posted by GoodfellaFD3S
Yeah, I'm sorry if I disappointed you, cadet ******** .

There was something wrong on the dyno......my power started to seriously tail off after 7200 rpms. Something about 94 degree heat and *no* air to the intake

Sure, we can make a run.....I've pulled you every other time we've raced on the highway (long time ago though)

My FD weighs right at 2700 I believe, with half a tank and full stereo, subwoofer etc.
whoa whoa whoa.....cadet?? didn't you know i graduated??

i'm guessing you never saw what i did to my UIM - i got rid of my double throttle when i went non-sequential which i believe was still long after the last time we ran on the highway....and i would hope that you would have pulled me back then with a tuned street ported motor against my stock port base mapped motor.....********....

2700 with full stereo is good. my car was pretty much empty and 3/4 tank of gas to weigh 2720.....i guess the sunroof adds quite a bit.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Turblown
Vendor Classifieds
12
Oct 17, 2020 03:25 PM
Rotate86
Single Turbo RX-7's
5
May 18, 2018 02:44 PM
userjh5174
Alternative Fuels
1
Jan 9, 2016 08:49 AM
matty
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
40
Oct 6, 2015 09:13 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:43 PM.