3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

port secondary ports closing only?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-08-17, 10:49 AM
  #1  
rotorhead

Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
arghx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: cold
Posts: 16,182
Received 429 Likes on 263 Posts
port secondary ports closing only?

I'm curious as to whether anyone has ported only the closing edge of the secondary intake ports. If my thinking is correct, this would add a little bit of top end breathing, without impacting overlap at all (no impact on idle or emissions or fuel economy) and with minimum impact on low and medium speed volumetric efficiency. The idea would be to extend the powerband slightly on a mostly stock setup.

Stock secondaries close at 50 degrees after bottom dead center, on an REW engine. Is it physically possible to change closing timing to, say, 70 degrees after bottom dead center, without affecting opening timing or overlap at all? Would you physically run into anything on the irons?
Old 05-08-17, 10:58 AM
  #2  
rotorhead

Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
arghx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: cold
Posts: 16,182
Received 429 Likes on 263 Posts
this is somewhat inspired by this chart from an old Mazda SAE paper. It's talking about the development of the 6 port naturally aspirated engines, but it got me to thinking.



Clearly first gen non turbo 6 port is different from a 3rd gen sequential twin turbo, but it's an interesting thought.
Attached Thumbnails port secondary ports closing only?-intake-closing.png  
Old 05-08-17, 03:43 PM
  #3  
TANSTAFL

iTrader: (13)
 
alexdimen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Richmond, Va.
Posts: 3,770
Received 123 Likes on 82 Posts
So in regards to VE does one shoot for maximum area under the curve or a peak number? Some combination of the two?

In the chart it looks like the difference between 50 deg (triangles) and 70 deg (circles) has a major trade-off between sub 5k VE for a slightly higher peak VE.
Old 05-08-17, 04:40 PM
  #4  
Rotary Motoring

iTrader: (9)
 
BLUE TII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: CA
Posts: 8,210
Received 763 Likes on 505 Posts
Well, Mazda did this obviously on the 6 port engines...

On the FD we have the double throttle plates (though way up in the UIM), so you could use this like the Euro 6 ports which were just throttle plates in the manifold instead of rotating sleeves.

If you just port the 2ndaries for later closing without blocking the 2ndary ports somehow the reversion will still be there to hurt low rpm power.

If you want to do this really well you could move some throttle butterflies, roller barrels or slide throttle plates into LIM or side housings for the 2ndary ports.

Throttle plates in the side housings would actually be quite easy.
I was thinking how you could do this for a j-bridge motor. Just the peripheral portion for low end/midrange power and then open the stock (but later duration ported) ports for top end power. Use valve guides/seals for the top and just drill into the bottom of the port for the shaft there.
Old 05-08-17, 11:14 PM
  #5  
Moderator

iTrader: (3)
 
j9fd3s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Posts: 30,800
Received 2,574 Likes on 1,830 Posts
Originally Posted by alexdimen
So in regards to VE does one shoot for maximum area under the curve or a peak number? Some combination of the two?

In the chart it looks like the difference between 50 deg (triangles) and 70 deg (circles) has a major trade-off between sub 5k VE for a slightly higher peak VE.
as you probably know, Mazda picked both, it runs 50 degrees until the 6 ports open and then you get 70 in the GSL-SE and 80 after that.

with the FD they had the turbos, so they didn't need fancy ports.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:21 PM.