3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Pcv valve Elimination Good, Bad

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-21-04, 01:01 AM
  #26  
FD title holder since 94

iTrader: (1)
 
Tim Benton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Cedartown, Ga
Posts: 4,170
Received 28 Likes on 21 Posts
not to mention, I've seen a few engines that I "think" the PCV fucked up, allowing boosted air into the oil pan and front cover, blowing out the gasket on the front cover. Leading to an expensive repair bill to get to the front cover gasket. There's really no reason for the front cover to ever leak unless it was being pushed on. Leak meaning blown out gasket material in the 2, 5, 7 and 11 oclock areas.

Tim
Old 10-21-04, 04:30 AM
  #27  
Senior Member

 
soru81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Slovenia
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tim: But how do you explain that mazda eliminated it in 95? I eliminated it for the sake of cleaner engine bay... every hose counts.
Old 10-21-04, 04:38 AM
  #28  
All Spooled Up

iTrader: (7)
 
badddrx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Ironton,ohio
Posts: 2,752
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
You can eliminate it. The crankcase is "vented" by the oil filler neck which has 2 nipples on it:

1) PCV valve
2) Line going to the inlet of the primary turbo

If you cap off the PCV, you aren't sealing anything. There is still the line going to the compressor housing. I eliminated mine because it was leaking and I didn't want to pay the Mazda price for a new one. As stated above, it was eliminated (along with the EGR) on the '95 car.

Sonny



This gentleman is correct. I did the exact thing on mine 3 years ago - NO issues. This was discussed long ago and deemed an ok mod.

Tom
Old 10-21-04, 06:52 AM
  #29  
Lives on the Forum

 
DamonB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Dallas
Posts: 9,617
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by xb2002
If you plumbed the catch can to the intake you would again need a pcv/checkvalve because you would be boosting into your catch can/crankcase and possibly blow some seals.
No. No. No. No.

You don't develop positive pressure until after the turbos. As long as the line goes to the actual intake in front of the turbos that line will see vacuum 100% of the time. That's why in stock form one is connected there from the oil fill tube. The other line from the oil fill tube connects to the inlet manifold which does see boost on occasion so the PCV also acts as a one way valve so boost can't make its way into the crankcase and pressurize it.

The car was designed with 2 lines because when under boost with only a pcv the crankcase would not be vented. A second line therefore runs to the intake side and that line is always "open". I believe it was changing emissions laws that allowed Mazda to delete the pcv even though functionally the system still performs the same purpose.

Last edited by DamonB; 10-21-04 at 06:57 AM.
The following users liked this post:
tomatoto (10-25-20)
Old 10-21-04, 06:59 AM
  #30  
Lives on the Forum

 
DamonB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Dallas
Posts: 9,617
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by badddrx7
If you cap off the PCV, you aren't sealing anything. There is still the line going to the compressor housing.
The line goes BEFORE the compressor housing. This is where vacuum is always present as the turbo(s) constantly pulls air through the intake. If you plumb TO the compressor housing you now have pressurized air and that is NOT what you want.
Old 10-21-04, 07:02 AM
  #31  
Lives on the Forum

 
DamonB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Dallas
Posts: 9,617
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by the_glass_man
GT35R, so would it be better to just tap the turbo housing and put the line there?
No. The line for crankcase ventilation must be run to a location in front of the compressor housing; that's why the stock twins have the nipples on the plastic elbow of the ptimary turbo. The wastegate and precontrol actuators OTOH need a boost source so they are plumbed from the compressor housing.
Old 10-21-04, 07:14 AM
  #32  
Super GReddy 7

Thread Starter
 
JayShadow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
That Doesnt sound good, I just bought a replacement from fritz this morning. hopefully this will resolve my boost issues.

Originally Posted by Tim Benton
not to mention, I've seen a few engines that I "think" the PCV fucked up, allowing boosted air into the oil pan and front cover, blowing out the gasket on the front cover. Leading to an expensive repair bill to get to the front cover gasket. There's really no reason for the front cover to ever leak unless it was being pushed on. Leak meaning blown out gasket material in the 2, 5, 7 and 11 oclock areas.

Tim
Old 10-21-04, 08:38 AM
  #33  
I AM A THEIF - I also go by EVIL7

 
xb2002's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: tx
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DamonB
No. No. No. No.

.
I didnt meen intake as being fresh air intake... I ment intake as the "intake manifold/uim/lim, which is under pressure while boosting. I think that the glass man has his catch can vacum routed to the uim/lim and this is a no no.
Old 10-21-04, 08:46 AM
  #34  
Rotary Freak

 
mad_7tist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: tampa
Posts: 1,899
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the purge controll solenoid/valve is for the fuel evap system.the pcv is different
Old 10-21-04, 09:14 AM
  #35  
Lives on the Forum

 
DamonB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Dallas
Posts: 9,617
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by xb2002
I didnt meen intake as being fresh air intake... I ment intake as the "intake manifold/uim/lim, which is under pressure while boosting.
Sorry. I agree with you in that case then.
Old 10-21-04, 11:52 AM
  #36  
Will u do me a kindness?

iTrader: (2)
 
the_glass_man's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Parlor City, NY
Posts: 5,031
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by xb2002
I didnt meen intake as being fresh air intake... I ment intake as the "intake manifold/uim/lim, which is under pressure while boosting. I think that the glass man has his catch can vacum routed to the uim/lim and this is a no no.
I have it located on my intake before the turbo.
Now I am confused. lol
Old 10-21-04, 11:54 AM
  #37  
Rotary Freak

 
mad_7tist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: tampa
Posts: 1,899
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
that will do
Old 10-21-04, 12:40 PM
  #38  
FD title holder since 94

iTrader: (1)
 
Tim Benton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Cedartown, Ga
Posts: 4,170
Received 28 Likes on 21 Posts
Just to clarify my statement, if the PCV valve messes up for whatever reason, it could let pressurized air into the oil pan and front cover gasket areas. There's no other reason for a front cover gasket to ever leak with the car running normally.

When you get the pcv from Fritz, just check it to see if you can blow through it like it says in the shop manual. Helps if you have a pump to pressurize the side that goes to the UIM to make sure it doesn't let air through at higher psi than you can think about trying to blow through there yourself.

Tim
Old 10-25-04, 11:07 AM
  #39  
Super GReddy 7

Thread Starter
 
JayShadow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
update: i recieved the pcv valve from fritz. i blewn throw both sides and no arir came though either side. Thanks fritz
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
trickster
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
25
07-01-23 04:40 PM
elfking
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
3
08-19-15 09:48 PM



Quick Reply: Pcv valve Elimination Good, Bad



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:48 PM.