3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Oil cooler setup

Old Jul 14, 2003 | 01:34 AM
  #1  
radkins's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,236
Likes: 1
From: Waiting for Indykid to catch up
Oil cooler setup

I am about to install my second oil cooler on my touring and was wondering if booth coolers have thermostats on them. The one I am adding is a DS from a touring. I remember reading that on an R1 setup only the first one has the t-stat, but from looking at the setup, it looks like you woud need two. Also, should I expect this thing to mount right up, or will I have to fab some mounts? I haven't even looked in there yet.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2003 | 01:56 AM
  #2  
duboisr's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,171
Likes: 1
From: Nashville Tn
I think you will need the mount and duct . do you have the correct hoses .
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2003 | 09:11 AM
  #3  
radkins's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,236
Likes: 1
From: Waiting for Indykid to catch up
Yes, all the hoses have been changed to -10 and ready to go.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2003 | 10:58 AM
  #4  
maxpesce's Avatar
Ex fd *****
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,782
Likes: 1
From: Ventura CA USA
IIRC the coolers are plumbed in series so only need 1 thermostat - the flow path = from engine thru t-stat to dr side cooler thru cooler then out to pass side cooler then back to engine -
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2003 | 11:16 AM
  #5  
93BlackFD's Avatar
built my own engine
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 3,470
Likes: 2
From: Buckhead, Atlanta
-10an hosing? what size fittings did you use to go into the oil coolers themselves?
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2003 | 11:19 AM
  #6  
DamonB's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,617
Likes: 8
From: Dallas
Originally posted by maxpesce
IIRC the coolers are plumbed in series so only need 1 thermostat - the flow path = from engine thru t-stat to dr side cooler thru cooler then out to pass side cooler then back to engine -
That's correct. I added an R1 passenger side cooler to my base model and that's exactly how it runs.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2003 | 01:14 PM
  #7  
rx7tt95's Avatar
Photo Diety
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,311
Likes: 0
From: Florida
the path is correct, but it seems to me you'd need a second thermostat. The internal thermo is bypassing the driver's side cooler and sending it to the passenger's side cooler. Cold oil w/no thermostat could equal a blown cooler. There needs to be two bypasses, one for each cooler, no?
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2003 | 01:50 PM
  #8  
DamonB's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,617
Likes: 8
From: Dallas
Originally posted by rx7tt95
the path is correct, but it seems to me you'd need a second thermostat.
No. If the first thermostat is closed the oil never even enters the first oil cooler and so there is no external oil circulation whatsoever.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2003 | 02:35 PM
  #9  
weaklink's Avatar
Resident Retard
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,918
Likes: 0
From: Cockaigne
from what i understand, the stock oil cooler has a built in thermostat.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2003 | 03:46 PM
  #10  
NewbernD's Avatar
Tequila? ..it's like beer
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,124
Likes: 0
From: Woodbine, MD
Originally posted by DamonB
No. If the first thermostat is closed the oil never even enters the first oil cooler and so there is no external oil circulation whatsoever.
Actually, Yes.

The thermostat is only a bypass for the particular cooler that it's attached to. Both of the stock R1 coolers have thermostats. Only if you ran an external thermostat that bypassed the entire cooling system, you would only need one thermostat, but that's not what the stock thermostats do.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2003 | 03:47 PM
  #11  
potatochobit's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,464
Likes: 0
From: Dallas
yes it is built in but if you added another driver side on the new passenger side you would have 2 thermostats.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2003 | 04:15 PM
  #12  
weaklink's Avatar
Resident Retard
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,918
Likes: 0
From: Cockaigne
right...built in thermostats, no blown cooler.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2003 | 04:16 PM
  #13  
weaklink's Avatar
Resident Retard
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,918
Likes: 0
From: Cockaigne
Originally posted by potatochobit
yes it is built in but if you added another driver side on the new passenger side you would have 2 thermostats.
I fail to see the point. Certainly no harm in running two thermostats.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2003 | 04:25 PM
  #14  
radkins's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,236
Likes: 1
From: Waiting for Indykid to catch up
The purpose of the "bypass" t-stat is so that oil is still circulating through the system. If you have a t-stat that just blocks oil flow, then the hot oil would never flow to the t-stat, it would have to be done by convection....or conduction....i can't remember which one. Correct?


And I bough adapers the go from the 22mm threaded holes in the oil cooler to -10. I got rid of the stock clip thing, cause no one seems to sell those connectors. Plus when I want to upgrade oil coolers, I just plug em in.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2003 | 04:41 PM
  #15  
93BlackFD's Avatar
built my own engine
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 3,470
Likes: 2
From: Buckhead, Atlanta
22mm threaded holes? 1.5mm pitch threads? did you use aeroquip? how are you going to run thermostats with -10 connections?
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2003 | 04:47 PM
  #16  
weaklink's Avatar
Resident Retard
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,918
Likes: 0
From: Cockaigne
Originally posted by radkins
The purpose of the "bypass" t-stat is so that oil is still circulating through the system. If you have a t-stat that just blocks oil flow, then the hot oil would never flow to the t-stat, it would have to be done by convection....or conduction....i can't remember which one. Correct?
Not sure what you are saying, but it works like this: There is an optimum temperature for the oil to flow through the system. Too cool and oil is more viscous and requires greater pressure to get through the system. If forced through an oil cooler, could result in a rupture, or busted lines. At the very least suboptimal lubrication, which is why you never want to rev the engine when the engine is cold. Thermostats work to shunt oil that is cooler than optimum back to the engine to be "warmed" to optimum temperature, thus saving the cooler and providing better lubrication. Oil that is as warm or warmer than optimum (thermostat opening temp, get it?) is routed through the cooler to be, ummmm, cooled.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2003 | 04:49 PM
  #17  
weaklink's Avatar
Resident Retard
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,918
Likes: 0
From: Cockaigne
Originally posted by 93BlackFD
22mm threaded holes? 1.5mm pitch threads? did you use aeroquip? how are you going to run thermostats with -10 connections?
shouldn't be a problem as the thermostats are built into the coolers.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2003 | 05:26 PM
  #18  
potatochobit's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,464
Likes: 0
From: Dallas
if there are two oil cooler thermostats, wouldnt the oil sit in the first oil cooler until it was reheated enough for the second to open? then there is no reason to run two oil coolers. it would be one oil heater and one oil cooler ha
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2003 | 05:42 PM
  #19  
NewbernD's Avatar
Tequila? ..it's like beer
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,124
Likes: 0
From: Woodbine, MD
Originally posted by potatochobit
if there are two oil cooler thermostats, wouldnt the oil sit in the first oil cooler until it was reheated enough for the second to open? then there is no reason to run two oil coolers. it would be one oil heater and one oil cooler ha

Thermostats do not block oil flow, they re-route it past the cooler. Period.

Everyone is right when they tell you not to worry because they're both stock coolers and both have internal thermostats, but don't forget to get the direction of the oil flow correct. Hook it up in the same fashion as your existing cooler.

You also asked what to expect when mounting this. It's not a direct bolt-in at all. You said that you have another drivers side cooler.. well, the R1 2nd oil cooler is a mirror-image of the driver's side cooler so you'll have to get creative with the mounting. The duct probably won't work at all but it might provide you with a good start at fiberglassing a new one.

I have some detailed pics from when I pulled mine off, if you need some reference. Just let me know. Good luck.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2003 | 05:56 PM
  #20  
radkins's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,236
Likes: 1
From: Waiting for Indykid to catch up
I am assuming the flow direction should be thermostat side = in?

What I was trying to ask earlier was, with aftermarket coolers and external t-stats, do they block flow or are they bypass also. I cant see how they are bypass without some creative plumming. If they do block flow when closed, how does hot oil ever get to the t-stat to open it. Does that make sense?
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2003 | 06:09 PM
  #21  
DaedelGT's Avatar
Uber Newb.
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
From: LSU - Baton Rouge, Louisiana
Sorry for the derail, but this thread seems remotely related.

What do you guys think would be better, another stock unit or a huge oil cooler in the stock location? This is barring a 99 spec front bumper that will eventually go on.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2003 | 06:17 PM
  #22  
rynberg's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 10
From: San Lorenzo, California
Originally posted by DaedelGT
Sorry for the derail, but this thread seems remotely related.

What do you guys think would be better, another stock unit or a huge oil cooler in the stock location? This is barring a 99 spec front bumper that will eventually go on.
With the stock bumper, I would think two stockers (R1/R2 setup) would work as good as or better than a large single one -- due to the small opening in the stock bumper. Now, if you are running a Mspeed GTC bumper, a single big one would probably work great!
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2003 | 07:32 PM
  #23  
NewbernD's Avatar
Tequila? ..it's like beer
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,124
Likes: 0
From: Woodbine, MD
Originally posted by radkins
I am assuming the flow direction should be thermostat side = in?

What I was trying to ask earlier was, with aftermarket coolers and external t-stats, do they block flow or are they bypass also. I cant see how they are bypass without some creative plumming. If they do block flow when closed, how does hot oil ever get to the t-stat to open it. Does that make sense?

Yup. Your question makes sense.

With an aftermarket setup, you have a t-stat with 4 couplings.. One line from the block, one line back to the block. One line to the cooler(s) and one line from them. When the oil is cold, the thermostat is closed and it just takes the return path back to the block. When it warms up the thermostat opens up a bit and some makes its way through the cooler(s). How much depends on the temperature.



I second Rynbergs thoughts on cooler preference. If you have the opening, a larger cooler would definitely be easier to implement and you'd keep a nice cool air duct on the other side of the car. The word on the street is that the stock coolers are pretty hard to beat. Assuming they aren't all beat up.


The coolers are made from very soft aluminum.. While you're in there I'd spend some time straightening the fins and maybe putting some screen in the ducts. Pics of Mine here
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2003 | 07:35 PM
  #24  
KevinK2's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,209
Likes: 6
From: Delaware
http://www.autosportracetech.com/RX-7/oilsystem.htm

All of the oil (except that which is above 150 psi after the pump and is relieved back to the sump) that is pumped thru the engine first goes thru the oil line to the 1st cooler. If cold, it bypassses to the return line to the oil filter, or to the 2nd cooler for R1s where if cold, it bypasses again and returns to the oil filter. There is only one return line.

R1 coolers are in series, not as efficient as parallel, but easier to plumb.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2003 | 08:11 PM
  #25  
weaklink's Avatar
Resident Retard
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,918
Likes: 0
From: Cockaigne
Originally posted by potatochobit
if there are two oil cooler thermostats, wouldnt the oil sit in the first oil cooler until it was reheated enough for the second to open? then there is no reason to run two oil coolers. it would be one oil heater and one oil cooler ha
uh...no...read the above response by Kevin2K to see what happens...probably they are the same as it was easier to design and mass produce one unit. What I think is confusing everyone is the fact that there are no seperate thermostats. They are built into the oil coolers. One line in, one line out. Let me borrow from www.bmracing.com :

"B&M's SuperCooler low pressure drop coolers reduce the risk of lube system failure. A controlled amount of ATF "(oil) "is allowed to bypass the stacked plate core, passing through a self-regulating orifice which monitors resistance to flow. Controlled by viscosity, the thicker ATF" (oil) "is returned directly to lube through two open bypass openings in the stacked plate core. As operating temperatures increase, more of the ATF" (oil) "flow is directed through the core. Resulting in a highly efficient cooling technology that combines improved protection against lube system failure with the required levels of optimal heat transfer. "
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:38 AM.