CantGoStraight

How's NPG+ a band aid for coolant....lets see run no pressure (good for all the collant system part), contains no water (so electrolisis is minimal if non-existant), contains lubricants (so the bearings and seals are conditioned) higher boiling point ( no fear of localized boiling within the engine ......I'm not seeing a band aid here, oh 5 million mile no need to replace, flush, or add anything to it.....our cars should last so long. I'm afraid i don't see a band aid here.

neit_jnf

iTrader: (17)

Evans controls nucleate boiling much better than any other, eliminating hot spots (read: protect coolant seals). That only to me is enough reason to use it.

PhoenixDownVII

This situation pisses me off. It's the same with Oil. There's 2 different sides/options (Synth vs. NonSynth, high weight vs. low weight) (Water vs. NPG)

I read and have very good defenses for both side, with proof and mileage of use etc. etc. so much that I can't decide.

I guess someone on scuderiani said it right (Jimlab, was it you?):

Every car is Different, no two Rx7's are the same. Sometimes you have to go by a case-by-case basis. (I think they were referring to boost issues with air intake/exhaust flow though...)

Meh.

Mahjik

iTrader: (1)

IMO, Evan's has a place when tracking the car. However, as Kevin mentioned, there are other things that should be looked at first with the cooling system before needing Evan's.

As far as Evan's on the street, IMO, it's kind of like a new shift ****: It might not be needed; but if someone wants to do it, go ahead!

neit_jnf

iTrader: (17)

I'd say Mazda should look into using it as factory coolant for all current (RX-8) or future rotary-engined cars, just because of it's inherent characteristic of running hotter and been less tolerant of overheat issues. Koenigsegg uses it as oem coolant, rotax aircraft engines also requires it.

KevinW

iTrader: (1)

i wish i had some of the cooler temps you guys see. i have an apexi gt FMIC and a koyo rad and when its 90+ F outside i see temps on my power FC up around 100-104 C on the highway with the undertray and the fans comming on at 83C. i run water coolant mix, but the wierd thing is, is that on the highway my car always seems to run hotter than when i'm in stop and go traffic. i could be up around 100C and come off the highway and come to a light and by the time the light turns green i'm down to like 93-95C so i guess my fans are working but what the hell is up with my highway temps.

SPOautos

Are you getting a lot of bubbles in your system? I've seen a car do that before right before the coolant seals totally gave out.....I hope thats not the case with your car but figured I should mention it because its a good possibility.

BTW - I dont get into the Evans product, never cared for it much. It has a lower specific heat which means its naturally going to run hotter just like someone else mentioned. If you put the same amout if heat in water and in Evans the temp of the evens will go higher. They can say the temps are higher because its absorbing more and all that all they want to but the fact is its going run hotter than water just because of the lower specific heat.

I've talked to C&R racing which designs cooling systems for Nascar as well as dragsters, F1, cart, spring cars, ect ect and they say there is NOTHING that cools better than water. They are the only radiator shop in the country(that I could find) with a wind tunnel that actually tests thing products and knows what they are talking about. If they liked Evans they would be selling it. Thats enough for me. A PROPERLY designed cooling system with water and a lubercant will cool better than Evans.

Stephen

pomanferrari

iTrader: (1)

Exactly! To each his own. For me, the decision came, on my second engine, with the VDO gauge at 250F but my factory gauge heading towards 11 o'clock position. That just tells me that I have uncontrolled boiling in my block b/c the factory gauge measures metal temperature rather than coolant temp.

NPG+ has been in my car almost 2 years (but only 4500 miles). Votage differential is still 0.02 volt.

KevinW

iTrader: (1)

no bubbles that i have notices and i dont run an AST, maybe that may help me out a little. car if fine i cooler temps, i also still have the stock front bumper, maybe it's time to upgrade. thanks for the info

jeffrored92

Just to add my two cents to this issue:

I would guess one benefit of running hotter coolant (ie: NPG) is that the increased temperature differential across the radiator (between hotter coolant and cool air flowing through) will increase the rate of heat transfer away from the coolant.

I would guess the increased temp differential (and heat transfer efficiency) at the radiator outweights the reduced temp differential (and heat transfer efficiency) in the block, so while you're temps may be a touch higher, the rate at which you're removing heat from the block is increased.

You have to ask yourself - are you trying to keep the coolant at low temperature? Or remove heat from the block? It comes down to the individual application.

technonovice

Water and coolant work fine if your car has been properly prepped. Its common and inexpensive. Evan may work just fine too. All I know is that I have never seen more than 98 deg C. Now I'm curious to see what on track temps I see with my ducting experiment.

Kento

If that were the case, then the Evans coolant would run the exact same (or less) temps as water or water/ethylene glycol mix.
In either case, you cannot tell what the actual temperature at the block is without a sensor measuring the temperature of the block itself. But the two facts remain: propylene glycol has a specific heat rating that is a third that of water itself, so it takes far less energy to heat up a specific quantity of propylene glycol than it does water. It simply can't match the heat energy absorption and transfer characteristics of water. PG's biggest benefit is its high vapor point, so it can still transfer heat at temps/pressures that would cause boiling in water or water/ethylene glycol mixes. But that is taking into account that there is indeed "nucleate boiling" taking place in areas of the block. If you're transfering the heat more efficiently through water and proper ducting of the radiator, who's to say that centralized boiling is indeed taking place?

I'm not saying that water is superior to propylene glycol in all cases, only that saying PG is always transfering more heat from the block (and thus causing higher coolant temps) is not quite the whole truth.

weaklink

I have the apex FMIC and have exactly the symptoms you describe. It's the FMIC blocking airflow to the radiator at speed. I keep meaning to fab some ducting, but I'm too lazy, err, busy.

weaklink

so at what temp do the coolant seals warp?

pomanferrari

iTrader: (1)

People, please keep in mind that no one runs pure water unless you're a Ferrari F1 V-10 with a 54 psi cap. Once you add 50% EG, the specific heat rating of the mixture is closer to NPG+ or midway b/w the two.

Also, NPG+ requires a higher coolant flow rate. It just happens that our car has a high flow rate that matches up with NPG+ heat transfer.

Trevor

Who here lives where it hits -27F where you would actually need a 50/50 mix?

You should minimum amount of anti-freeze to cover for your local climate...any higher concentration than that isn't optimal.

Kento

"Midway b/w the two" is a more apt description--meaning it is still inferior. Even if you're running a full 50/50 EG mixture (which isn't hardly necessary), you'll have a specific heat rating of 0.5, while propylene glycol can only manage 0.3.

But if the flow rate "matches up with NPG+ heat transfer", then why do temps with it always soar to such high levels?

Tom93R1

iTrader: (2)

I have run NPG+ for 2 years now, this is the 3rd Phoenix summer for me starting now. When I made the switch I noticed very little change in the water temps. My cooling system upgrades are Koyo and an aftermarket AST. The Evans was the last change from stock and I cant even say that there was any noticable difference to my temps as a result.

What I do like is that now I never can hear any kind of boiling when I shut the engine off. I used to hear a bit of gurgling coming from around the turbos but not since Evans.

Jack

iTrader: (2)

Bottom line here with respect to this discussion, the 3rd gen cooling system was not designed properly. Even with an upgraded Mazda comp radiator (ducted) Crooked Willow oil coolers (ducted) Vented hood, Underdrive pulleys, and if you go the track, THE CAR WILL OVERHEAT. I have logged well over 100 track days and been and Instructor for over 7 years and every 7 on the track is ONLYS at the limit if you DRIVE IT HARD. The Evans system is the only one I know that will deal with the high coolant temps the 7 will generate WITHOUT BOILING. Water is far superior in every way regarding it's ability to cool a motor under 200f. However that is NEVER the case when you drive the 7 at the track thus Evans is the next best solution.

RedR1

iTrader: (5)

I was always under the impression that Evan's needed a stagnant, zero pressure system, meaning that there is no flow on it, hence removing the rubber on the bottoms of the rad caps. . . . Am I reading something wrong here from their site?

KevinK2

The inferior heat transfer props of the NPG also hold true at the rad ... in spite of the higher inlet temp ( vs egw at same load ) the heat shed is no more, or even less since the oil cooler(s) are hotter, and shedding more of the total waste heat.

For the same load and flows, the npg+ will result in higher metal temps, verified by higher oil temps, vs egw.

If your FD runs over 220F at track events, npg+ is one corrective option where you will be more reliable at a 10-15F higher operating temp, which could be verified by lower knock readings. In general, I don't see that it hurts to use it.

-----------

If one has a fmic pushed up against the stock bumper opening, with some of the end tanks visible, best to just show the car in hot climates, or drive it easy. This typical mod dramatically reduces natural air flow through the nose, and natural air flow is what is needed at high loads/speeds.

KevinW

iTrader: (1)

yeah, i want to do something but just never really have time or something else on the car breaks and i have to fix that first. maybe i'll just sell the apexi and go with a greddy, anyone want an apexi GT?

Trevor

I 100% agree. I really don't want to run NPG because of it's properties other than the awesome boiling point (as I've said before I used to use it in my Stealth so i have experience). Problem is my 7's cooling system doesn't get much better than it is now. I may be able to seal off a couple spots but I'm thinking that might be worth 2-3F. As much as I don't want to I think I'm going to have to go with Evans. The question of the day is should I go with NPG+ or NPG-R? This is the only info I have on NPG-R:
http://www.evanscooling.com/news/npgR.htm
I wonder if the specific heat is any better than the NPG+? I can't find that anywhere so I went ahead and emailed Evans. Maybe its better than NPG+.

Tom93R1

iTrader: (2)

0 pressure doesnt mean no flow. It just means as it heats up the expansion goes into the overflow instead of building pressure. Flow is not dependant on pressure.

jimlab

Correct. Flow is dependent on the water pump and thermostat. Boiling point is dependent on pressure in egw systems.

Yep. Assuming that the higher temperatures seen with Evans coolant means more heat is being pulled out of the metal is a common misconception, and one that Evans probably doesn't mind people making.