3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

non sequential vs sequential?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 23, 2008 | 08:44 PM
  #1  
chrisdrx's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
From: ireland dublin
non sequential vs sequential?

what would be the pro's and cons of it im thinking about getting it done just need to find out more
Old Sep 23, 2008 | 10:06 PM
  #2  
RotorDream's Avatar
Rotary Ninja
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
From: Wichita Falls, TX
the 3rd button from the right says "Search" you should try it sometime
no offence man, but this is one of if not THE most discussed topic in the 3rd Gen section. everything you want to know is already here, now go find it
Old Sep 24, 2008 | 12:36 AM
  #3  
moconnor's Avatar
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,678
Likes: 96
From: Bay Area, CA
So you are thinking about doing a non-sequential conversion but you don't know why?

Despite the fact that all the cool kids are doing it, this is by far the most pointless modification that you could make to your FD. It made some sense back in the '90s when there was not enough information out there to properly debug a broken sequential system. Now it is primarily a lame newbie fashion statement and, if the number of I-simplified-my-rat's-nest-and-now-my-turbos-are-weird posts are anything to go by, 90%+ of these conversions completely **** up the turbo control system.
Old Sep 24, 2008 | 12:37 AM
  #4  
Monkman33's Avatar
Goodfalla Engine Complete
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,243
Likes: 42
From: Kennewick, Washington
sequential will give you more power down low, but won't peak as high (very marginal), retains complex sequential system. VERY responsive

Non-sequential = just go single, there is no point in running parallel twins with the stock restrictive manifold. You are only losing efficiency.

and to all of those people that rant and rave about their non-seq... get over it. it's true.

so the real question is: keep twins (and learn the sequential system) or go single?
Old Sep 24, 2008 | 07:41 AM
  #5  
RA8225's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 7,141
Likes: 46
Originally Posted by Monkman33
so the real question is: keep twins (and learn the sequential system) or go single?
Go single? got 10K +?
Old Sep 24, 2008 | 08:03 AM
  #6  
Mahjik's Avatar
Mr. Links
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 27,595
Likes: 43
From: Kansas City, MO
Arrow

https://www.rx7club.com/showpost.php...31&postcount=2
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ls1swap
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
17
Jun 3, 2024 03:25 PM
Snook
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
17
Feb 27, 2021 02:54 PM
HalifaxFD
Canadian Forum
126
May 9, 2016 07:06 PM
Snook
Single Turbo RX-7's
39
Oct 4, 2015 08:47 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:32 AM.