3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

non-sequential seems to have eliminated my problem?...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 17, 2004 | 04:06 AM
  #1  
spekdah's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,003
Likes: 0
From: New Zealand
sequential seems to have eliminated my problem?...

I've been having a lot of trouble with my engine stuttering at 4500rpm.
After a search I was convinced it was ignition, I checked my sparkys and replaced ( 2 b safe) and still had the problem. Then I started thinking it was a vacume or turbo issue.
Today I completed my poor mans non seq mod, now the car feels great! and the power ( even though boost comes on 3000-4000rpm) is smooth right through the curve to 6500rpm , I managed 16.5psi in a run??!!

So do you think I was right , was it a turbo problem NOT an ignition one??
Or does the non seq correct these kinds of ignition problems??
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2004 | 05:34 AM
  #2  
evot23's Avatar
Classy
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 6,900
Likes: 2
From: Gainesville, FL
Could have been a vacuum problem, which you eliminated when going non-sequential. Doing the nonsequential mod has nothing to do with your ignition.

16.5psi on stock twins isn't good.
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2004 | 05:52 PM
  #3  
spekdah's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,003
Likes: 0
From: New Zealand
why is 16.5 psi not good? too much power?
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2004 | 05:55 PM
  #4  
clayne's Avatar
PV = nRT
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,250
Likes: 0
From: New Zealand (was California)
YES.

Too much charge temp heat for the stock IC, too much airflow for the stock fuel system, and please tell me you aren't running the stock engine management.
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2004 | 05:56 PM
  #5  
evot23's Avatar
Classy
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 6,900
Likes: 2
From: Gainesville, FL
Too much for stock twins to handle. You'll be decreasing the life of your turbos. Besides, stock twins lose their efficiency around 15 psi.
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2004 | 06:01 PM
  #6  
scotty305's Avatar
~17 MPG
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,479
Likes: 334
From: Bend, OR
Read this, look for something about efficiency or something like that...

http://auto.howstuffworks.com/turbo.htm


Basically, your turbochargers were designed to be run at certain levels of boost. If you exceed this too much, you put extra stress on them, which will cause the turbo's to wear out more quickly.

Even before they wear out, overboosting will cause the air to be hotter, which might lead to detonation, which could destroy your apex seals.


How much boost can your turbo's make safely? The answer to that is beyond my knowledge.


One other thing, which year is your RX7? In NZ, you guys have the 96+ models also, correct?


-s-
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2004 | 07:11 PM
  #7  
spekdah's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,003
Likes: 0
From: New Zealand
I,m running a 400 x 300 x 100 FMIC, I have 3mm seals, and a fully dyno tuned PFC. But I suppose this is not enough????
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2004 | 07:14 PM
  #8  
RX7Wishing's Avatar
BOOOYAHHHH!
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,578
Likes: 1
From: Virginia Beach
you could have a MAc Truck IC, but if you dont have the fuel to compinsate for the increase in charged air..well.. you know..

Plus a IC isnt going to save your turbos
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2004 | 07:14 PM
  #9  
clayne's Avatar
PV = nRT
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,250
Likes: 0
From: New Zealand (was California)
That's much better.

However.. check fuel system capabilties (pump, injector, fpr capacities, etc.) and have it dyno tuned at around 1 bar max.
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2004 | 07:17 PM
  #10  
evot23's Avatar
Classy
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 6,900
Likes: 2
From: Gainesville, FL
Excellent supporting mods but the fact remains that the turbos can't handle/weren't meant to handle 16.5 psi. Your engine is looking safe with all of that but now you just need a bigger turbo.

What about fuel delivery?
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2004 | 12:19 AM
  #11  
spekdah's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,003
Likes: 0
From: New Zealand
right, thats it then ay? I'm gonna go single, I got a mate with a big *** turbo for sale, an HKS T51 Kai, would this give me much power???
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2004 | 06:33 AM
  #12  
evot23's Avatar
Classy
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 6,900
Likes: 2
From: Gainesville, FL
oh yeah!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
HalifaxFD
Canadian Forum
126
May 9, 2016 07:06 PM
Nosferatu
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
7
Sep 5, 2015 02:13 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:22 PM.