3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

non-sequential seems to have eliminated my problem?...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-17-04, 04:06 AM
  #1  
Rotary Enthusiast

Thread Starter
 
spekdah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 1,003
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
sequential seems to have eliminated my problem?...

I've been having a lot of trouble with my engine stuttering at 4500rpm.
After a search I was convinced it was ignition, I checked my sparkys and replaced ( 2 b safe) and still had the problem. Then I started thinking it was a vacume or turbo issue.
Today I completed my poor mans non seq mod, now the car feels great! and the power ( even though boost comes on 3000-4000rpm) is smooth right through the curve to 6500rpm , I managed 16.5psi in a run??!!

So do you think I was right , was it a turbo problem NOT an ignition one??
Or does the non seq correct these kinds of ignition problems??
Old 03-17-04, 05:34 AM
  #2  
Classy

iTrader: (17)
 
evot23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 6,900
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Could have been a vacuum problem, which you eliminated when going non-sequential. Doing the nonsequential mod has nothing to do with your ignition.

16.5psi on stock twins isn't good.
Old 03-17-04, 05:52 PM
  #3  
Rotary Enthusiast

Thread Starter
 
spekdah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 1,003
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
why is 16.5 psi not good? too much power?
Old 03-17-04, 05:55 PM
  #4  
PV = nRT

 
clayne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: New Zealand (was California)
Posts: 2,250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
YES.

Too much charge temp heat for the stock IC, too much airflow for the stock fuel system, and please tell me you aren't running the stock engine management.
Old 03-17-04, 05:56 PM
  #5  
Classy

iTrader: (17)
 
evot23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 6,900
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Too much for stock twins to handle. You'll be decreasing the life of your turbos. Besides, stock twins lose their efficiency around 15 psi.
Old 03-17-04, 06:01 PM
  #6  
~17 MPG

iTrader: (2)
 
scotty305's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Bend, OR
Posts: 3,289
Received 224 Likes on 151 Posts
Read this, look for something about efficiency or something like that...

http://auto.howstuffworks.com/turbo.htm


Basically, your turbochargers were designed to be run at certain levels of boost. If you exceed this too much, you put extra stress on them, which will cause the turbo's to wear out more quickly.

Even before they wear out, overboosting will cause the air to be hotter, which might lead to detonation, which could destroy your apex seals.


How much boost can your turbo's make safely? The answer to that is beyond my knowledge.


One other thing, which year is your RX7? In NZ, you guys have the 96+ models also, correct?


-s-
Old 03-17-04, 07:11 PM
  #7  
Rotary Enthusiast

Thread Starter
 
spekdah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 1,003
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I,m running a 400 x 300 x 100 FMIC, I have 3mm seals, and a fully dyno tuned PFC. But I suppose this is not enough????
Old 03-17-04, 07:14 PM
  #8  
BOOOYAHHHH!

 
RX7Wishing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 1,578
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
you could have a MAc Truck IC, but if you dont have the fuel to compinsate for the increase in charged air..well.. you know..

Plus a IC isnt going to save your turbos
Old 03-17-04, 07:14 PM
  #9  
PV = nRT

 
clayne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: New Zealand (was California)
Posts: 2,250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That's much better.

However.. check fuel system capabilties (pump, injector, fpr capacities, etc.) and have it dyno tuned at around 1 bar max.
Old 03-17-04, 07:17 PM
  #10  
Classy

iTrader: (17)
 
evot23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 6,900
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Excellent supporting mods but the fact remains that the turbos can't handle/weren't meant to handle 16.5 psi. Your engine is looking safe with all of that but now you just need a bigger turbo.

What about fuel delivery?
Old 03-18-04, 12:19 AM
  #11  
Rotary Enthusiast

Thread Starter
 
spekdah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 1,003
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
right, thats it then ay? I'm gonna go single, I got a mate with a big *** turbo for sale, an HKS T51 Kai, would this give me much power???
Old 03-18-04, 06:33 AM
  #12  
Classy

iTrader: (17)
 
evot23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 6,900
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
oh yeah!
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
HalifaxFD
Canadian Forum
126
05-09-16 07:06 PM
Nosferatu
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
7
09-05-15 02:13 PM



Quick Reply: non-sequential seems to have eliminated my problem?...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:50 AM.