dubcaps

alright guys ive been getting a 10-5-5 boost pattern for quite some time. from what ive heard going non-sequential should get rid of my boost problems so i can finally feel the fury of both turbos functioning properly. my only concern is that b/c my car is an auto how bad will lag be, i can deal with some, but not a ridiculous amount. i already know the car is poo off the line and i have no problem with the fact i cant do much of anything until about 2500-3000ish. on a non sequential set up how long would it be (roughly) until i reach full boost. anyway thanks for the help.
-stephen

sunnyxwala

i think about 4000 rpm...and trust me when i imagine that on my auto..it would suck big time!

dubcaps

but as i said before im not getting full boost during or after transition, given these conditions what do you think?
-stephen

rynberg

Don't go non-sequential. Fix the problem. It sounds like you have a boost leak or there's a problem with your charge relief valve. Your primary sounds good.

check out this page, especially the secondary turbocharger section about half way down.

http://home.istar.ca/~dvandit/TurboT...shooting.shtml

the_glass_man

iTrader: (2)

Don't do it man, the two don't mix.

Scorpio

I've been non-seq for a few years now. It's great, IMO, but only if you modify your driving style and you use your gears more to keep the rpms up (so you can minimize lag).

With an auto, I don't think you will have the same control...not too mention there are fewer gears. I wouldn't recommend going non-seq with an auto tranny.

Hope this info helps and good luck with the boost problems.