3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

New exhaust

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 6, 2004 | 05:07 PM
  #1  
F0RSAKEN's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cheese
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
From: Lynnwood, WA
New exhaust

I just had a custom 3" cat back installed by a performance muffler shop here where I live, cost me less than 250 dollars, used a Stainless Magnaflow w/ the straight through design. Car also has a DP (dunno whos).



Its very quiet at idle, just a deep tone (reminds me of some Supras Ive heard) and its not all that loud at WOT either, but it does have a powerful sports car sound. All in all Im very pleased with it....and its cheap

Just a heads up for anyone who doesnt want to pay 500+ for a pre-made/brand name exhaust. Ill post a sound clip soon hopefully, or whenever I can get my hands on a DV cam.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2004 | 06:24 PM
  #2  
1QWIK7's Avatar
White chicks > *
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,146
Likes: 1
From: Secaucus, New Jersey
thats cool man, i need to get me one of those

but what about hp gains? brand name exhausts for the rx7s are made for a reason, idk..
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2004 | 07:56 PM
  #3  
Rx-7Addict's Avatar
Rotary Powered
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,272
Likes: 1
From: Chicago, IL
Originally Posted by ulost2my7
thats cool man, i need to get me one of those

but what about hp gains? brand name exhausts for the rx7s are made for a reason, idk..
Most catbacks are the same HP wise, and all should flow about the same. As long as its 3" catback, then there should be no reason to go with an expensive catback unless you prefer the sound or something like that. The real gains are going to be made exhaust-wise with a downpipe and most notably, a midpipe...
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2004 | 07:56 PM
  #4  
Narfle's Avatar
Rx7 Wagon
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 6,978
Likes: 888
From: California
all hail the back alley cat back for under 300 dollars!!!
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2004 | 02:34 AM
  #5  
Speed of light's Avatar
Form follows function
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,231
Likes: 47
From: Now in Arizona
FWIW:

I have flow bench tested various exhaust pieces for the FD. The stock cat-back is very restrictive--but it is quite. It is significantly more restrictive than a good flowing cat. BONEZ seems to have the best high flow CAT design.

Exhaust restrictions are cumulative, so the most gains will come with eliminating the largest ones first.

Anyway, I would do a downpipe, cat-back, then high flow cat or resonated mid-pipe in that order, based on testing. Note that resonated pipe sections will not hurt and can actually improve flow (with a good resonator section).

Tubing size is not that critical. In fact 2.5" is adequate if there are no critical bends. 3" is reasonable with some bends, but don't exceed that or you'll narrow the powerband of the engine due to loss of gas velocity and resulting column inertia effects.

I use the PFS cat-back and an additional resonator to reduce drone with excellent results. This exhaust is not a restriction per se.
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2004 | 03:11 AM
  #6  
akiratdk's Avatar
The Laser Man
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,326
Likes: 1
From: GLENDALE, CA
its looks nice... but... I think I would paint the muffler black... it looks very tin-can like color.... but I think if its black it will look more quality!~~~
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ian_D
New Member RX-7 Technical
6
Sep 6, 2015 10:38 PM
doritoloco
New Member RX-7 Technical
7
Sep 5, 2015 12:41 PM
FührerTüner
General Rotary Tech Support
3
Sep 4, 2015 01:41 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:38 AM.