Neat Little Tool: Acceleration Calculator on RP's website
#1
Original Gangster/Rotary!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (213)
Neat Little Tool: Acceleration Calculator on RP's website
Was poking around the web and came across this:
http://www.rx7.com/accel_calculator.html
According to the calculator, my FD will run an 11.97@118.31 at 12 psi . An 11 second car on low boost, I'll take that, lol. To get those results, I entered in 342 rwhp, 2875 pounds (weight with driver), 3 shifts, 25 inch tire height (stockers) and 4.10 gear.
http://www.rx7.com/accel_calculator.html
According to the calculator, my FD will run an 11.97@118.31 at 12 psi . An 11 second car on low boost, I'll take that, lol. To get those results, I entered in 342 rwhp, 2875 pounds (weight with driver), 3 shifts, 25 inch tire height (stockers) and 4.10 gear.
#3
Original Gangster/Rotary!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (213)
Originally Posted by spoolin93r1
only bad thing about calulators like that is you never know to go by rwhp or flywheel hp
Rich
#5
Super Snuggles
10.55 @ 135.38 at 0 psi
Edit: Oops... entered 4 shifts the first time. I doubt I'd hit 5th in the quarter.
3,000 lbs., 550 RWHP, 3 shifts, 25 inch tire, 3.55 gear
Edit: Oops... entered 4 shifts the first time. I doubt I'd hit 5th in the quarter.
3,000 lbs., 550 RWHP, 3 shifts, 25 inch tire, 3.55 gear
Last edited by jimlab; 09-02-04 at 01:07 AM.
Trending Topics
#8
Administrative Me
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Kansas
Posts: 1,370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
9.44 @ 142.69; 13.5 psi.
8.71 @ 154.48; 27 psi.
This was calculated with the weight of the car including me, & gas.
Looks good on paper. But, in reality, I see my tires spinning or the rear end hopping, etc.
Interesting enough, if I removed 100lbs from the car (for my car has full accessories & more):
9.34 @ 144.15; @ 13.5 psi
or
8.62 @ 156.06; @ 27 psi.
Interesting how much I would have to sacrifice in weight for that small gain in speed. I think I will keep my 7" touchscreen, 1ghz computer, and the fast and the furious DVD.
8.71 @ 154.48; 27 psi.
This was calculated with the weight of the car including me, & gas.
Looks good on paper. But, in reality, I see my tires spinning or the rear end hopping, etc.
Interesting enough, if I removed 100lbs from the car (for my car has full accessories & more):
9.34 @ 144.15; @ 13.5 psi
or
8.62 @ 156.06; @ 27 psi.
Interesting how much I would have to sacrifice in weight for that small gain in speed. I think I will keep my 7" touchscreen, 1ghz computer, and the fast and the furious DVD.
#9
Original Gangster/Rotary!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (213)
Originally Posted by Red-Rx7
9.44 @ 142.69; 13.5 psi.
#11
Super Snuggles
Originally Posted by Red-Rx7
9.44 @ 142.69; 13.5 psi.
8.71 @ 154.48; 27 psi.
This was calculated with the weight of the car including me, & gas.
Looks good on paper.
8.71 @ 154.48; 27 psi.
This was calculated with the weight of the car including me, & gas.
Looks good on paper.
BTW, what are you estimating that your horsepower would be at 27 psi? And for how long?
#12
Super Snuggles
Originally Posted by ulost2my7
thats a cool tool
but obviously it just gives your a general idea.
but obviously it just gives your a general idea.
#14
Super Snuggles
Originally Posted by GoodfellaFD3S
If there was any doubt that the the three rotor will crush anything.......a mid 9 second pass on low boost/pump gas. I doubt any of the V8 muldoons can top that......
Muldoons. I like that.
#15
Original Gangster/Rotary!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (213)
Originally Posted by jimlab
There's a guy named Baxter running a supercharged LT1 in a 3,900 lb. Camaro convertible that is in the 8s. Let's see what the 20B would do in a 3900 lb. car.
Muldoons. I like that.
Muldoons. I like that.
I dunno, dropping a 20B in a 3900# car makes about as much sense as FD Altezza tails.....
Rich
#16
Administrative Me
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Kansas
Posts: 1,370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by jimlab
What did you enter for weight? Entering 620 RWHP, 2,850 lbs., and 3 shifts, I got 10.05 @ 142.41. Even with 1 shift, I couldn't get it to cough up a 9.44. What gives?
BTW, what are you estimating that your horsepower would be at 27 psi? And for how long?
BTW, what are you estimating that your horsepower would be at 27 psi? And for how long?
weight 2922 (thats what I weighed in as on a truck scale; for it is the only thing I have to go on).
640 rwhp. 630 was at 6100 rpm. I estimated 10 more rwhp in 1600 more rpm.
0 shifts. I have a clutchless transmission.
With regards to the 27 psi, I was not estimating. We dyno tuned the car for up to that PSI. I didn't publish the dyno graph for that PSI, for a few reasons:
1) It wasn't as high as we expected it to be (turbo too small)
2) The intake tempatures started going up very very fast at that PSI. I don't feel it to be very safe, so I don't really consider the numbers all that valid. But this thread is about potential, and that is what it is.
#17
Super Snuggles
Originally Posted by Red-Rx7
0 shifts. I have a clutchless transmission.
With regards to the 27 psi, I was not estimating. We dyno tuned the car for up to that PSI. I didn't publish the dyno graph for that PSI, for a few reasons:
1) It wasn't as high as we expected it to be (turbo too small)
2) The intake tempatures started going up very very fast at that PSI. I don't feel it to be very safe, so I don't really consider the numbers all that valid. But this thread is about potential, and that is what it is.
1) It wasn't as high as we expected it to be (turbo too small)
2) The intake tempatures started going up very very fast at that PSI. I don't feel it to be very safe, so I don't really consider the numbers all that valid. But this thread is about potential, and that is what it is.
#18
STi Boxer power!
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 2,160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hmm..
HP: 330
Weight: 2885 (2720+165)
Shifts: 3
Tire height: 25 (same as stock)
Gears: 4.10
Results:
Power to weight: 8.9
E.T.: 12.17
Trap Speed: 116.27
Trap RPM: 6413
Guess I need to find out how accurate this is
HP: 330
Weight: 2885 (2720+165)
Shifts: 3
Tire height: 25 (same as stock)
Gears: 4.10
Results:
Power to weight: 8.9
E.T.: 12.17
Trap Speed: 116.27
Trap RPM: 6413
Guess I need to find out how accurate this is
#20
Administrative Me
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Kansas
Posts: 1,370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by jimlab
A.K.A. automatic. Gotcha.
Okee doke. So XXXX RWHP.
Okee doke. So XXXX RWHP.
I would never have an automatic in a car like this.
With regards to the rwhp, yes. But, I have edited it out; for I would rather have creative minds do the math. I don't want to have everyone PM me every day on how much my car put down in RWHP.
Thanks,
Mike
#21
Super Snuggles
Originally Posted by Red-Rx7
A.K.A, dog box transmission. The shift times are rated in miliseconds, so it is nearly as fast as an automatic.
#22
Administrative Me
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Kansas
Posts: 1,370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by jimlab
You still have to shift a transmission with dog rings. You may not have to depress the clutch each time, but there's still time involved in the shift. You're saving a few tenths of a second, but that's it.
"If you are running a clutchless transmission, or if you do not let off the accelerator pedal, input 0 (zero) for number of shifts."
.. and that is what I did. As far as time being involved in the shift, you are correct. Shift times have been measured at 35 miliseconds. So again, the time the calc spit out is as accurate to me as to you.
#23
Super Snuggles
Originally Posted by Red-Rx7
"If you are running a clutchless transmission, or if you do not let off the accelerator pedal, input 0 (zero) for number of shifts."
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Charlotte, N.C.
Posts: 445
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hmmm. So everyone is getting accurate trap readings for this? It didn't for me.
Riddle me this Batman:
I have stock FD, dyno'd 219 HP. It weighs 2850lbs with me in it(I'm a little guy) and spare tire removed. With stock tires/wheels and stock rear end I came up with a trap speed of 101mph (it spit out a ET of 13.68)
Here is a video of me running the 1/8th mi at a local track on a hot and humid summer evening in Charlotte NC. Track Elevation is 850 ft.
http://davidhillsoftware.com/Videos/...eds8.7run.mpeg
That was my slowest pass on video. Out of 3 runs and having not been to the track in over a year I netted a 8.5@83mph as my quickest pass from that night. That 1/8th mi trap is good for a 106-107 trap. What gives?
Riddle me this Batman:
I have stock FD, dyno'd 219 HP. It weighs 2850lbs with me in it(I'm a little guy) and spare tire removed. With stock tires/wheels and stock rear end I came up with a trap speed of 101mph (it spit out a ET of 13.68)
Here is a video of me running the 1/8th mi at a local track on a hot and humid summer evening in Charlotte NC. Track Elevation is 850 ft.
http://davidhillsoftware.com/Videos/...eds8.7run.mpeg
That was my slowest pass on video. Out of 3 runs and having not been to the track in over a year I netted a 8.5@83mph as my quickest pass from that night. That 1/8th mi trap is good for a 106-107 trap. What gives?
#25
Administrative Me
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Kansas
Posts: 1,370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ForceFed
That was my slowest pass on video. Out of 3 runs and having not been to the track in over a year I netted a 8.5@83mph as my quickest pass from that night. That 1/8th mi trap is good for a 106-107 trap. What gives?
It was a good run, but stock 3rd gen's don't trap 107+ in the 1/4 mile.