3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

MT ET Streets vs M & H's Racemaster Drag tires

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-03-02, 01:46 AM
  #1  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
racer rx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: canada
Posts: 401
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MT ET Streets vs M & H's Racemaster Drag tires

Does anyone know how the Mickey Tompson ET streets
would compare to the M & H Racemaster tires?

In terms of better 60 ft times and stability down the track?
I have used the M&H's in the past and yeilded 60 fts. as low as 1.67. Average 1.7 to 1.8. However the M&H's were like skies at times fighting to countersteer to keep er straight. The M&H's I used have about a 4"
wider profile than my freshly purchased 26/10.5/16 ET Streets, would this matter at all?

Any averages for 60 ft. on the MT ET streets?

I guess I will find out this weekend, if the weather permits.
thanks for the replies.
jack.

Last edited by racer rx; 10-03-02 at 01:48 AM.
Old 10-03-02, 04:29 AM
  #2  
Full Member

 
CTHIS RX7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ive got ET drags and they are as good as ET streets for 60ft's. a guy I know has run 1.53 60ft's off the ET streets in a 26/11.5/16.
next time i will be buying ET streets.
Old 10-03-02, 10:40 AM
  #3  
Full Member

 
Toddzilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm pretty sure that the ET streets will be more squirrely than the M&H tires due to their softer sidewall.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
apooch
Single Turbo RX-7's
8
09-04-15 10:27 AM



Quick Reply: MT ET Streets vs M & H's Racemaster Drag tires



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:32 PM.