3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Modern fuel system for stock

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 26, 2025 | 07:25 AM
  #1  
FooZiken's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 9
Likes: 3
Modern fuel system for stock

I'm in a process of collecting parts for my future FD build. So now a time for fuel system. Some info on car: 93 JDM FD, all stock except PFC and sport catalytic. So I want to stay stock power wise (maybe a bit more around 300 hp with proper tune (already have FC-Tweak) but with new modern parts where is possible to enhace drivability. I plant to go with Radium primary and secondary rails with their FPD and FPR. But I can't decide what injectors do I need. Radium suggests ID but it is a bit overprice for my goal I suppose.
What can you suggest for near stock power with twins if I want to replace stock old injectors for some newer design?
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2025 | 09:50 AM
  #2  
FDAUTO's Avatar
よ*ろ*し*く*
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2022
Posts: 1,628
Likes: 677
From: Tampa
Stock is fine. You're going to be well over 1000$ for a fuel system no matter what you do. Stock twins, Stock power, stock injectors. Upgrade the pump and leave everything else alone. If you want to do something injector related, send them out to be cleaned.

Plus, if you plan to keep the sequential system then fitting aftermarket rails is a mission on its own. It's a lot of work.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2025 | 03:31 PM
  #3  
gracer7-rx7's Avatar
needs more track time
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,729
Likes: 784
From: Bay Area CA
^what he said

KISS

Seen too many people get mod happy or "upgrade" happy and wind up with an unreliable car.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2025 | 04:02 PM
  #4  
FooZiken's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 9
Likes: 3
So you think better atomization doesn't worth the hassle and money?
I plan to delete ACV since I have O2 feedback off and route air pump directly to catalytic. And I also plan to move rat's nest somewhere from UIM. So fitting isn't an issue I guess.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2025 | 05:26 PM
  #5  
FDAUTO's Avatar
よ*ろ*し*く*
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2022
Posts: 1,628
Likes: 677
From: Tampa
No
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2025 | 11:50 PM
  #6  
scotty305's Avatar
~17 MPG
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,466
Likes: 323
From: Bend, OR
Years ago, I removed the ACV and installed different fuel injectors on my car for the purpose of running E85 fuel. My first version of the setup had the Xcessive manufacturing lower intake manifold and a single fuel rail (with the OEM primary injector ports blocked off), but I never got acceptable idle or low-RPM behavior with that setup. I added a top-feed fuel rail and very small 300cc/min fuel injectors to the primary location, and now the car can idle super lean even when the engine is cold. But it still smells like a stinky rotary until the cat converter warms up, so I'm not sure I would recommend it unless you are starting without a working fuel system and buying aftermarket parts instead of new OEM injectors. I do like how the car behaves when running E85, but that's not easy to do with a Power FC.

If you're looking for reliability, I would replace all the rubber fuel lines and coolant hoses on the car. And then I would replace the factory radiator and delete the AST. And then make sure the car has fresh sticky tires, and go to some autocross days to get familiar with how it handles. These cars don't have any traction control and they are not nearly as forgiving as most other cars.
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2025 | 07:28 AM
  #7  
gdub29e's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member: 10 Years
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 788
Likes: 281
From: Millersville Md
Originally Posted by FooZiken
So you think better atomization doesn't worth the hassle and money?
I plan to delete ACV since I have O2 feedback off and route air pump directly to catalytic. And I also plan to move rat's nest somewhere from UIM. So fitting isn't an issue I guess.
Originally Posted by FDAUTO
No



This ^




Friendly advice, don’t try to recreate the wheel. Sure you can maybe make all that stuff work together at the cost of great time and energy. With little to no return on your investment. While I agree newer injectors have some benefit, you would need an ecu that was capable of adjusting injector timing to really take advantage. The rabbit hole runs deep. Not always worth going down it tho.

The stock injectors are ideal for your target hp and setup plans. Make sure you have the air atomizing hose hooked up for the primary’s and you’ll be fine. If you feel the need to do something with the fuel system, get your injectors cleaned as suggested and replace the FPR and pulsating dampener.

Also, FC tweak is great. If you plan to stay with the power Fc, I would pick up the “Master”.


~ GW
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2025 | 08:07 AM
  #8  
FooZiken's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 9
Likes: 3
Thank you friends
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
NE_rotary
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
5
Mar 16, 2010 03:55 PM
rotaryinside
Single Turbo RX-7's
11
Feb 10, 2008 10:24 AM
SuperRotorMan
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
18
Dec 30, 2005 09:34 PM
nemeii
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
1
Mar 9, 2005 06:20 AM
Rx7UpYurs
Single Turbo RX-7's
18
May 13, 2003 10:48 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:35 AM.