To Mod or Not to Mod?
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Tallahassee. Fl
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
To Mod or Not to Mod?
On a previous post, I was drilled by many fellow RX-7 lovers for endrosing MODS other than reliability MODS, this raises a question... Are non reliability and so called "super mods" (nos and other compressed gasses) truly a "de-filement" to RX-7's... and any other quality import????
#3
Meesto Spakaro
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Redondo Beach, CA
Posts: 489
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
well, the mods you were wanting to do to your car first were body kit, rims, heavy sound system, underbody neons, and nawssss
those mods were purely cosmetic...with the exception of n2o (which can be considered a cosmetic mod/fashionable accessory, since it is a completely unnecessary and dangerous component in a stock rx7)
A lot of FD owners expressed resentment because that route of modification often will lead to one more death of an exceedingly rare car, at the hands of a reckless owner who is modding improperly.
It is your money, so you can spend it in which ever way you want-- as judgemental and critical some posts may sound, a lot of it is sound advice in keeping your FD from blowing up and winding up in a junkyard.
those mods were purely cosmetic...with the exception of n2o (which can be considered a cosmetic mod/fashionable accessory, since it is a completely unnecessary and dangerous component in a stock rx7)
A lot of FD owners expressed resentment because that route of modification often will lead to one more death of an exceedingly rare car, at the hands of a reckless owner who is modding improperly.
It is your money, so you can spend it in which ever way you want-- as judgemental and critical some posts may sound, a lot of it is sound advice in keeping your FD from blowing up and winding up in a junkyard.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
demetlaw
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
6
10-02-15 06:22 PM