3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

May need more fuel, change primaries or secondaries?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-01-11, 03:46 PM
  #26  
Rotary Freak
iTrader: (28)
 
Double_J's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 2,089
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I ran 550/1300 with bnr stage 3. Tuned by thewird at 17psi. I think he said I was at 90% duty (I think). I wanted to run higher boost (20psi) but I wouldn't have enough fuel. I had a stock fpr so that might have played a small factor.
Old 02-01-11, 04:06 PM
  #27  
Bann3d. I got OWNED!!!

iTrader: (22)
 
RX7 RAGE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 5,014
Received 63 Likes on 22 Posts
^ How much rwhp did you put out double j?
Old 02-02-11, 03:05 PM
  #28  
Rotary Freak
iTrader: (28)
 
Double_J's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 2,089
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not much. I should have clarified. I hit 17psi then my boost would drop down to 15 or so. The car only managed to get 310HP. I believe this dyno is very conservative as another forum member was around 400HP with a single turbo aspec 500r. Every dyno is different so I do not pay much attention to the number.

Had it held 17 till red line I likely would have got a bit more, but I do not have the car any more.
Old 02-05-11, 01:02 AM
  #29  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
 
red_dragon's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 618
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Hmm okay thanks for the advice guys. I'll just give my current fuel system a shot.
Old 02-06-11, 01:12 PM
  #30  
Weird Cat Man

 
Wargasm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: A pale blue dot
Posts: 2,868
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Just to add another 2 cents.

My ballpark rule of thumb is that for most RX-7s at near-stock fuel pressures, your max rwhp is about (total fuel in cc/min) / 10. That's running nearly 100% duty which is not cool. So really you're looking at probably x another 0.9 to keep in the safe zone.

So for 550/1300, you have (550+550+1300+1300) / 10 = 370 wheel horsepower MAX running at or around 100% duty (not really safe!). So multiply by 0.9 and that gets you 333 wheel horsepower with some safety margin.

So I'm saying that at near stock fuel pressures and assuming your fuel pump can keep up and doesn't drop off, you're good for 333-370 range more or less.

Reports vary on the 850 primary debate. There are definitely those that say they won't function that well at idle AND people that say they are fine.

As for the 550/1600 transition, my car has these, and it runs very smoothly BUT I have also heard other people have a hell of time getting the transition smooth.

When it comes to the RX-7, there isn't usually a solid answer hahah.
Old 04-13-15, 09:28 PM
  #31  
2SoonJr

iTrader: (8)
 
FD7KiD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: OrangeCounty-Santa Ana
Posts: 525
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
So how is the transition with iD725/2000 or iD725/1300 on Full Function Rails ??
Old 04-13-15, 11:47 PM
  #32  
F'n Newbie...

iTrader: (6)
 
fendamonky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Nokesville, Va
Posts: 3,928
Received 313 Likes on 228 Posts
Holy helluva bump!!!

My car was able to transition smoothly with id1000/id2000 run parallel with FFE rails and a PFC.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
trickster
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
25
07-01-23 04:40 PM
Queppa
New Member RX-7 Technical
8
09-02-18 09:53 AM
Skeese
Adaptronic Engine Mgmt - AUS
65
03-28-17 03:30 PM



Quick Reply: May need more fuel, change primaries or secondaries?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:19 AM.