3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

low dyno numbers??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 19, 2002 | 05:00 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Rotor Nut.
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,163
Likes: 2
From: RI
low dyno numbers??

i dynoed my rx7 last week and i got 258 at 12psi. i think they are low numbers for what is in the car. i have greddy ic, pettit ecu, modded intake, boost control, water injection, msd, cat back, resonated midpipe, but i have stock dp. any ideas why low. i thought it would be the dp but a couple people told me it wasnt much difference.???
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2002 | 05:18 PM
  #2  
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,643
Likes: 0
From: l.a.
get the dp, you also might have a boost leak somewhere.
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2002 | 05:27 PM
  #3  
Thread Starter
Rotor Nut.
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,163
Likes: 2
From: RI
possible. ill check. i just didnt think it was that low. i wasted a vr4 the other day up to 150 and he had some parts. my car breaks loose in 1st and 2nd and once in a while in 3rd when the second turbo kicks in and i have 265 35-18s. i have noticed that alot of people dyno in 3rd gear. i dynoed in 4th make any difference???
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2002 | 05:29 PM
  #4  
adam c's Avatar
Cheap Bastard
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,368
Likes: 50
From: San Luis Obispo, Ca
When you say "stock downpipe", I assume you mean the stock pre-catalytic converter. I'm not sure I have ever heard of someone putting a mid pipe on and leaving on the pre-cat.

Your exhaust will flow only as fast as the most restrictive part of the system will allow. If you have the stock pre-cat, your mid pipe isn't being used to it's full potential. In fact, it's probably doing very little for you. If you put on a down pipe your exhaust will be greatly improved. You will also need to keep a close eye on boost and fuel.

Adam
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2002 | 05:33 PM
  #5  
Thread Starter
Rotor Nut.
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,163
Likes: 2
From: RI
yea stock pre cat. i bought the car like that i didnt pay attention to it. because the car was already fast so i assumed it was there. also he said it was gutted the stock dp/pre cat
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2002 | 09:16 PM
  #6  
neevosh's Avatar
The Dude Abides
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
From: san jose, ca
That is pretty low. Can you post the dyno sheet? What did the A/F ratios look like?
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2002 | 10:50 PM
  #7  
kwikrx7's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,392
Likes: 0
From: Mechanicsburg, PA USA
at 12 psi with your mods, I'd imagine you'd be around 280-300 rwhp. If you post your sheet we might be able to see what's going on.
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2002 | 12:47 AM
  #8  
GsrSol's Avatar
Z06 powered FD
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,883
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, Texas
Yea, you should be close to 300. With the stock precat, your midpipe and cb aren't really doing anything extra for you. You're also keeping more heat in. Do a dp and you will be very happy just by the butt-o-meter.
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2002 | 01:18 AM
  #9  
Mr rx-7 tt's Avatar
rotary sensei
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,316
Likes: 3
From: Virginia
Re: low dyno numbers??

Originally posted by smg944
i dynoed my rx7 last week and i got 258 at 12psi. i think they are low numbers for what is in the car. i have greddy ic, pettit ecu, modded intake, boost control, water injection, msd, cat back, resonated midpipe, but i have stock dp. any ideas why low. i thought it would be the dp but a couple people told me it wasnt much difference.???
The problem with your car is the dp..lose it. They are restrictive and they clog. When you remove it you should dyno ~320rwhp.
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2002 | 10:51 AM
  #10  
Thread Starter
Rotor Nut.
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,163
Likes: 2
From: RI
320 would be great. thats what im looking to get. ill post my dyno sheet after the new year im on vacation right now. i can explain some of it though . it increased normal,4800 jumped when the second turbos kicked in and hp and tq crossed at about 5800. my a/f was rich it was in the high 10s and then at high rpm 6k + its went below to high 9s low 10s. when i get the dp i will adjust it better maybe add a psi up to 13 to bring it to 11-11.5. just looking to get about 320rwhp.
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2002 | 10:58 AM
  #11  
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,643
Likes: 0
From: l.a.
is the greddy ic a fm or a sm? 320 should be feasible w/ a fmic, but pushing it w/ a smic.
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2002 | 10:59 AM
  #12  
genieman17's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
From: Connecticut
Thats weird that your hp and torque crossed at 5800. The reason im saying that is because by definition of what horsepower is and what torque is they can only cross at 5252 rpm.
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2002 | 11:01 AM
  #13  
Thread Starter
Rotor Nut.
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,163
Likes: 2
From: RI
its a sm im looking for a fm greddy 2 row
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2002 | 11:03 AM
  #14  
Thread Starter
Rotor Nut.
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,163
Likes: 2
From: RI
i know i was expecting 5252, dont know why its 5800. it maybe a little less because i dont have the dyno sheet here in front of me but i know it was over 5500.
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2002 | 11:04 AM
  #15  
genieman17's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
From: Connecticut
The reason i mentioned that is because if they did cross at 5800 then the dyno is just wrong. The dyno cant measure hp what it does is measure torque and then calculates hp based on a formula. Formula being torque at a specific rpm multiplied by the rpm divided by 5252. That is why at 5252 the hp and torque is the same. If for some reason their formula is messed up for the calculation and the hp and torque intersected at 5800 then what they're doing is torque times rpm divided by 5800 and at 6500 rpm that can give you a low hp rating by up to 30-40 hp, so in fact you can be pushing really high hp...
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2002 | 11:06 AM
  #16  
genieman17's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
From: Connecticut
if you can tell me your peak hp and the rpm of the peak hp, and also the actual intersection point i can give you the actual hp numbers.
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2002 | 11:14 AM
  #17  
Thread Starter
Rotor Nut.
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,163
Likes: 2
From: RI
yea thats true they dyno could be messed up. what i will do is i will call someone to go to my house and give me everything exact. ill get the cross, highest tq and highest hp at whatever rpm they were at. ill post that tonight
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2002 | 11:16 AM
  #18  
genieman17's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
From: Connecticut
Fact is your car could be running 300hp and the dyno said 258...in which case you should ask for your money back....
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2002 | 03:56 PM
  #19  
kwikrx7's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,392
Likes: 0
From: Mechanicsburg, PA USA
If you're squeeling your tires going into 3rd with 265s out back you have over 300 rwhp - 258 rwhp with your tires would spin in 1st and a little in 2nd but genieman17 is probably right on this one. Definitely get the DP though - lots of heat on those turbos -
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2002 | 06:47 PM
  #20  
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,483
Likes: 0
From: US
what was ur A/f with pettit ecu?
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2002 | 06:57 PM
  #21  
rynberg's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 10
From: San Lorenzo, California
When you say the torque and hp cross at 5800 rpm, look on both sides of the graph and make sure the scales for hp and torque are the same. Sometimes they are different, which will cause a different cross-over point (graphically speaking).

Also, what kind of dyno was it? A dynamic dyno will show less than a dyno jet.

EDIT: Oh, and for the love of god, get a downpipe on there!
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2002 | 09:31 PM
  #22  
neevosh's Avatar
The Dude Abides
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
From: san jose, ca
Originally posted by rynberg
When you say the torque and hp cross at 5800 rpm, look on both sides of the graph and make sure the scales for hp and torque are the same. Sometimes they are different, which will cause a different cross-over point (graphically speaking).

Also, what kind of dyno was it? A dynamic dyno will show less than a dyno jet.

EDIT: Oh, and for the love of god, get a downpipe on there!
I was going to ask those same two questions. I guess great minds think alike.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2002 | 07:58 AM
  #23  
Thread Starter
Rotor Nut.
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,163
Likes: 2
From: RI
ok i got my dyno numbers. it crossed at 5850 rpm. made the 258.2 at 6500. and the torque was 242.8 at 5100. it was tested on a dynojet. anyway one of my friends read it off to me so i dont know if they are exactly right. they sound it but im not positive. whats the formula to find out how much hp i make? and the downpipe will be on as soon as i get back home.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2002 | 09:14 AM
  #24  
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,483
Likes: 0
From: US
A/F ratio PLEASE???
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2002 | 01:01 PM
  #25  
genieman17's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
From: Connecticut
Ok well, I did out the calculation. If you are getting 258.2 @6500 that means that your torqe at 6500 multiplied by 6500 divided by 5850 (thats the crossing point) gives you the HP number. So if you reverse the calculation and divide 258.2 by 6500 and multiply that by 5850 you get the torque at 6500rpm which is 232.4. Now if you redo the HP calculation and multiply by 6500, but this time divide by 5252 (which by definition of torque and HP HAS to be the crossing point) you get 287.6HP. Now this calculation is right assuming one thing; that the crossing point was in fact 5850 and that the scales for the HP and torque graphsare the same, because if they're not it will only appear as though they intersect there.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:32 AM.