3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Low Boost Pattern 8-0-4

Old Oct 6, 2003 | 08:41 PM
  #26  
SleepR1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,131
Likes: 2
From: IN
Just updating my thread. I ruled out turbo control issues and the turbos themselves as root causes. I'm chasing down either a boost leak or exhaust leak. I began snugging all the nuts on the turbo assembly (attachment to the exhaust manifold). A few of the nuts needed some snugging. The center bolt on the turbo assembly is backed all the way out. There are 5 bolts on the periphery, and a 14-mm nut/bolt in the middle between the precontrol and wastegate actuator rods. This is a very good place for exhaust gasses to leak out. I haven't figured out if this center bolt is broken or just backed out. I need to get a deep-well 14-mm socket and flex-head ratchet. Once I pull the bolt out and inspect it, I'll know. Hopefully I'll be able to just snug the center bolt back down, and my problem will be solved??!!

Last edited by SleepR1; Oct 6, 2003 at 08:45 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2003 | 08:02 PM
  #27  
SleepR1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,131
Likes: 2
From: IN
Following up on this thread. The boost pattern has dropped to 4-0-4. We've taken care of all the possible boost control issues. The '99 J-spec twins were inspected, and there doesn't appear to be any problems with the turbos themselves. New charge relief, charge control actuator, double throttle, and turbo control solenoids were installed (on the solenoid rack). CCA butterfly was checked. New o-ring in the CCA pipe installed. Intake system was pressureized, with no apparent leaks. Boost pattern remains 4-0-4.

It seems the lack of power/acceleration and subsequent lack of boost might be due to another system problem/failure.

Looking at fuel delivery, throttle sensor, ignition, exhaust restriction.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2003 | 05:31 AM
  #28  
Herblenny's Avatar
DGRR 2017 4/26-4/30, 2017
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 13,597
Likes: 6
From: Alabama
Manny,

I'm going to suggest couple of things.. And I could be very wrong about this.. but I did have ton of boost issues in the past..

By my experience so far, when both turbos boost low, It always been leak in the IC.. I'm not sure if you are running aftermarket IC piping or stock.. but I would check your lines.. Also, check your IC itself.. I notice that its usually something simple.. when both turbos aren't making boost..

If that doesn't work.. it could be that your vac chamber is not holding enough vacuume.. maybe because of the oil, reducing space.. or your one way valves are bad.. which was my case when i had secondary boost issue..

but primary.. it might be the pre-control, turbo control, waste gate solenoid issue.. I recently had primary turbo problems.. where all my boost kicked on at 4000RPM.. And I think it was my AVC-R.. now it works fine.. The AVC-R replaces stock pre-control and waste gate..
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2003 | 09:10 AM
  #29  
SleepR1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,131
Likes: 2
From: IN
Originally posted by herblenny
Manny,

I'm going to suggest couple of things.. And I could be very wrong about this.. but I did have ton of boost issues in the past..

By my experience so far, when both turbos boost low, It always been leak in the IC.. I'm not sure if you are running aftermarket IC piping or stock.. but I would check your lines.. Also, check your IC itself.. I notice that its usually something simple.. when both turbos aren't making boost..

If that doesn't work.. it could be that your vac chamber is not holding enough vacuume.. maybe because of the oil, reducing space.. or your one way valves are bad.. which was my case when i had secondary boost issue..

but primary.. it might be the pre-control, turbo control, waste gate solenoid issue.. I recently had primary turbo problems.. where all my boost kicked on at 4000RPM.. And I think it was my AVC-R.. now it works fine.. The AVC-R replaces stock pre-control and waste gate..
checked all these. looking hard at an exhaust restriction or fuel delivery problem...
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2003 | 10:58 AM
  #30  
7racer's Avatar
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,736
Likes: 10
From: Dallas, Texas
Manny,

are you still getting oil into the vacuum chamber despite the catch can???

what was the final consensus of the cause?

It seems like you started noticing turbo problems when this symptom first showed up.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2003 | 04:53 PM
  #31  
SleepR1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,131
Likes: 2
From: IN
Originally posted by 7racer
Manny,

are you still getting oil into the vacuum chamber despite the catch can???

what was the final consensus of the cause?

It seems like you started noticing turbo problems when this symptom first showed up.
Yes, I was, but not as much. My theory is that the GReddy 2-row FMIC is such a huge car that there's still residual oil in the core that makes its way into the intake. After the oil catch can install the intake piping is dry from the Efini Y-pipe to the inlet side of the FMIC. On the outlet side of the FMIC the piping has oil in it. Still don't understand why there is oil the vacuum chamber. I recently found out there was oil in the CCA actuator, which needed to be drained out. Still at 4-0-4.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2003 | 05:29 PM
  #32  
PaulyDee's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 245
Likes: 0
From: Indianapolis
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2003 | 07:21 PM
  #33  
SleepR1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,131
Likes: 2
From: IN
I was studying the 1993 Rx-7 Workshop Manual, Toubleshooting (Section F).

Basically my problem falls under "Poor Acceleration" and "Lack Of Power".

The manual defines "poor acceleration" as engine speed that increases but vehicle speed slowly increases during acceleration.

The manual suggests checking:

1. Fuel injectors (leakage or clog)
2. Pressure regulator
3. Fuel filter (clogged)
4. Spark plugs
5. Igniter (poor connection of connector)
6. Air leakage in intake
7. Pressure sensor (pressure sensor filter hose clogged, or poor connection of connector)
8. Crank angle sensor (poor conncection)
9. Metering oil pump (oil pump malfunction--fuel injection and ignition timing fixed)
10. Solenoid valves (Turbo control, charge control malfuction)
11. EGR control system (EGR control valve stuck open)
12. Water thermosensor (malfunction)
13. Double throttle control system

The manual defines "lack of power" as poor performance under load.

The manual suggests checking:

1. Pressure sensor (malfunction)
2. Secondary fuel injector (poor connection of injector or clogged nozzle)
3. Turbo boost leak
4. Spark plugs
5. Throttle sensor (full range)
6. Fuel filter (clogged)
7. Pressure regulator (malfunction)
8. Double throttle control system (double throttle valve not open)
9. Sequential twin turbo control system (secondary port not open)
10. EGR control system (EGR valve stuck open)
11. Air filter (clogged)
12. Catalytic converter (clogged)
13. Fuel low octane
14. Metering oil pump (poor connection of connector)

A few of the above items have been addressed on both lists.

For the good of the FD Rx7 community, I will follow-up once it's solved. Hopefully you all could learn from my solutions of problems and help others with answers instead of posting a "devil" smiley and relishing in someone's misfortune...

Last edited by SleepR1; Oct 29, 2003 at 07:38 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2003 | 11:24 PM
  #34  
PaulyDee's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 245
Likes: 0
From: Indianapolis
[i]instead of posting a "devil" smiley and relishing in someone's misfortune... [/B]
You have no idea.

For the record, I contribute substantially to the FD community on and off this board. Had it been anyone else, the problem would have already been addressed and most likely alleviated. Good hunting.

Oh and one more thing.....
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2003 | 05:24 AM
  #35  
SleepR1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,131
Likes: 2
From: IN

Last edited by SleepR1; Oct 30, 2003 at 05:38 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2003 | 06:40 AM
  #36  
SleepR1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,131
Likes: 2
From: IN
Cool Clogged Cat Root Cause

Updating this thread. The root cause for low boost was a clogged high-flow catalytic converter. The Bonez was installed in 1998. The cat had 74,000 miles. Currently deciding between midpipe and another high-flow cat replacement.
Originally posted by SleepR1
I was studying the 1993 Rx-7 Workshop Manual, Toubleshooting (Section F).

Basically my problem falls under "Poor Acceleration" and "Lack Of Power".

The manual defines "poor acceleration" as engine speed that increases but vehicle speed slowly increases during acceleration.

The manual suggests checking:

1. Fuel injectors (leakage or clog)
2. Pressure regulator
3. Fuel filter (clogged)
4. Spark plugs
5. Igniter (poor connection of connector)
6. Air leakage in intake
7. Pressure sensor (pressure sensor filter hose clogged, or poor connection of connector)
8. Crank angle sensor (poor conncection)
9. Metering oil pump (oil pump malfunction--fuel injection and ignition timing fixed)
10. Solenoid valves (Turbo control, charge control malfuction)
11. EGR control system (EGR control valve stuck open)
12. Water thermosensor (malfunction)
13. Double throttle control system

The manual defines "lack of power" as poor performance under load.

The manual suggests checking:

1. Pressure sensor (malfunction)
2. Secondary fuel injector (poor connection of injector or clogged nozzle)
3. Turbo boost leak
4. Spark plugs
5. Throttle sensor (full range)
6. Fuel filter (clogged)
7. Pressure regulator (malfunction)
8. Double throttle control system (double throttle valve not open)
9. Sequential twin turbo control system (secondary port not open)
10. EGR control system (EGR valve stuck open)
11. Air filter (clogged)
12. Catalytic converter (clogged)
13. Fuel low octane
14. Metering oil pump (poor connection of connector)

A few of the above items have been addressed on both lists.

For the good of the FD Rx7 community, I will follow-up once it's solved. Hopefully you all could learn from my solutions of problems and help others with answers instead of posting a "devil" smiley and relishing in someone's misfortune...
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2003 | 05:10 PM
  #37  
Herblenny's Avatar
DGRR 2017 4/26-4/30, 2017
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 13,597
Likes: 6
From: Alabama
That's awesome.. Good to hear that it was the cat..
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2003 | 05:44 PM
  #38  
SleepR1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,131
Likes: 2
From: IN
Originally posted by herblenny
That's awesome.. Good to hear that it was the cat..
Yeah, went with MP, air pump removal, and Power FC dyno-tuned to 1.05 kg/cm^2 (15 psi)
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2003 | 06:46 PM
  #39  
7racer's Avatar
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,736
Likes: 10
From: Dallas, Texas
wow!

I thought those Bonez were suppose to last a lot longer?!?!?
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2003 | 07:13 PM
  #40  
SleepR1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,131
Likes: 2
From: IN
7racer, I've had quite few track events on that cat. The extreme heat from open-tracking probably burned up the brick material and mesh screen that holds the honeycomb stuff together. I'll see if Rx7 Store can take pics of the Bonez high flow. As a precaution, I went with a MP, so I don't have to deal with that failure again I'm looking forward to what my car feels like with more top end juice, and perhaps flammage through the RB dual tip LOL
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2003 | 06:42 PM
  #41  
SleepR1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,131
Likes: 2
From: IN
Originally posted by SleepR1
I'll see if Rx7 Store can take pics of the Bonez high flow. As a precaution, I went with a MP, so I don't have to deal with that failure again I'm looking forward to what my car feels like with more top end juice, and perhaps flammage through the RB dual tip LOL
No pics, but I did peak inside the high flow cat. The bricks were in pieces. Shake the cat up and down, and you can hear the broken bricks (they sound like jigzaw puzzle pieces in a tin can). Replaced the high-flow cat with a straight-through MP and removed the air pump. What a difference?! Turbos spool much more quickly. Exhaust sound is ok at light throttle. Stomp on the go pedal, and the sound gets raw and angry. MP and leaned out AFRs yielded a 20 rwhp gain. 11ish AFRs is not rich enough to cause flammage out of the RB dual tip though.

Last edited by SleepR1; Nov 3, 2003 at 06:45 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2003 | 07:19 PM
  #42  
7racer's Avatar
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,736
Likes: 10
From: Dallas, Texas
wow congrats!! Now your making me seriously think about getting a MP....

I had my mind set on a high flow cat....I just don't think I can take the fumes
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2003 | 07:30 PM
  #43  
Mahjik's Avatar
Mr. Links
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 27,595
Likes: 43
From: Kansas City, MO
Originally posted by 7racer
wow congrats!! Now your making me seriously think about getting a MP....

I had my mind set on a high flow cat....I just don't think I can take the fumes
Well, I'll bet the new tuning made the biggest difference. However, even going from a clogged cat to a new cat one would still feel like a huge power gain.

If fumes and smelling like exhaust are going to be a problem, stay away from a midpipe.
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2003 | 10:52 AM
  #44  
SleepR1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,131
Likes: 2
From: IN
Originally posted by 7racer
wow congrats!! Now your making me seriously think about getting a MP....

I had my mind set on a high flow cat....I just don't think I can take the fumes
Actually the fumes weren't any worse than when my high-flow cat was failing (probably was clogged for awhile, and I didn't know it until the low boost pattern symptoms).

If you don't have to worry about SOs (significant others) riding with you, go midpipe, baby

I just read a post from 7 eleven on how to adjust my Power FC for flammage

Scroll toward the bottom of this thread https://www.rx7club.com/showthread.p...89#post2304489

Last edited by SleepR1; Nov 5, 2003 at 10:55 AM.
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2003 | 11:53 AM
  #45  
7racer's Avatar
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,736
Likes: 10
From: Dallas, Texas
Manny!

I thought you were one of the older more sensible forum members....

now your polluting the air and burning tail feathers!!!

What next......stickers?!?!?

just kidding
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2003 | 11:58 AM
  #46  
SleepR1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,131
Likes: 2
From: IN
Originally posted by 7racer
Manny!

I thought you were one of the older more sensible forum members....

now your polluting the air and burning tail feathers!!!

What next......stickers?!?!?

Older? Yes!

Indiana does not do emissions testing

Stickers? Yes, I'm running autocross numbers this weekend (3 SM2)

Last edited by SleepR1; Nov 5, 2003 at 12:00 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2003 | 04:16 PM
  #47  
SleepR1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,131
Likes: 2
From: IN
New boost pattern with straight-through (nonresonated) midpipe, Power FC tuned to 11 AFRs, and with recent 50 F ambient ATs yielding 18 to 20 C AITs:

0.85 kg/cm^2, pr/sc, 50% base duty cycle...12.1--14.1--12.1 psi

So much for that low boost pattern

Replacing the old clogged high-flow cat is like uncorking the Genie out of the bottle! Damn car is a beast, now. Still getting used to the new power Will autocross it this Sunday in SM2. Looking forward to drift practice hee hee

Last edited by SleepR1; Nov 7, 2003 at 04:22 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2003 | 05:13 PM
  #48  
7racer's Avatar
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,736
Likes: 10
From: Dallas, Texas
Damn!!! thats NICE!

Congrats Manny!
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2003 | 08:01 PM
  #49  
SleepR1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,131
Likes: 2
From: IN
Originally posted by 7racer
Damn!!! thats NICE!

Congrats Manny!
The 2 psi boost spike at the transition, is apparently common with a midpipe. I had Rx7 Store tune to 1.05 kg/cm^2 (15 psi), and at that level, I had a 1.15 kg/cm^2 (16.4 psi) spike, so a 0.99 kg/cm^2 (14.1 psi) spike is nothing to worry about even with the recent cool ambient air temps The car feels GREAT. Took my wife out in the car this evening...she doesn't like it. It's too stressful for her LOL
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2003 | 05:37 AM
  #50  
SleepR1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,131
Likes: 2
From: IN
Although the transition from primary to secondary turbo is fine, I managed to vacuum pump 24 oz of oil from my vacuum chamber. I'm still puzzled by this. I can only guess that the FMIC (GReddy 2-row) has a very large internal volume. So the 7 months I ran "Speed Sauce" BEFORE re-routing the oil venting to a catch bottle, the intake oil had collected in the FMIC. AFTER the oil vent re-route job, the intake pipe BEFORE the FMIC is dry. There is some oil AFTER the FMIC, so this must be the oil source? Sooner or later the oil remaining in the FMIC core will be purged, and I won't have this problem (oil collecting in the vacuum chamber) anymore.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Queppa
New Member RX-7 Technical
11
Nov 18, 2024 03:47 AM
dkwasherexd
Single Turbo RX-7's
21
May 27, 2017 04:51 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:15 PM.