The list to be on...who ran these times with stock twins/non-ported motor.
Thread Starter
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,568
Likes: 1
From: Lantana, Texas
The list to be on...who ran these times with stock twins/non-ported motor.
All nonsequential stock twins except Wyum who had some sort of upgraded twins, all with a midpipe.
Kevin Wyum 11.13 125.00
AnthonyNYC 11.15 122.35
Brooks Weisblatt 11.21
Brian Dowling 11.42 120.60
Boostn7 11.56 122.00
ErnieT 11.69 119.00
Ryan (don't be a Rikki) 11.78 116.38
Redline 53 11.80 116.00
Sequential Twins, Midpipe
The DJ 11.30 118.00
Silver7 11.66 118.00
RTS3gen 11.77 116.77
Red_Line_53 11.80 116.00
fastrx7man 11.78 @ 117.96
I guess that means there are 6 times I am shooting for??? How many of those times were with a non-ported motor?
Kevin Wyum 11.13 125.00
AnthonyNYC 11.15 122.35
Brooks Weisblatt 11.21
Brian Dowling 11.42 120.60
Boostn7 11.56 122.00
ErnieT 11.69 119.00
Ryan (don't be a Rikki) 11.78 116.38
Redline 53 11.80 116.00
Sequential Twins, Midpipe
The DJ 11.30 118.00
Silver7 11.66 118.00
RTS3gen 11.77 116.77
Red_Line_53 11.80 116.00
fastrx7man 11.78 @ 117.96
I guess that means there are 6 times I am shooting for??? How many of those times were with a non-ported motor?
Z06 powered FD
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,883
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, Texas
Well Boostn7 is the man to beat right now. He does have a ported motor but ran an 11.0 on drag radials.
A while back someone ran 10.98 on stock ports and twins.
7 tenths of a second is going to be alot harder to get now plus you're already on slicks. Good times though. I could probably knock off 7/10s now that it's alot cooler, turn up the boost a few psi, and throw on some slicks. I'm sequential.
A while back someone ran 10.98 on stock ports and twins.
7 tenths of a second is going to be alot harder to get now plus you're already on slicks. Good times though. I could probably knock off 7/10s now that it's alot cooler, turn up the boost a few psi, and throw on some slicks. I'm sequential.
Super Snuggles
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 10,091
Likes: 34
From: Redmond, WA
I think your numbers are inaccurate...
Brooks Weisblat's car was sequential and his best run ever was an 11.42. In fact, he says so on his Viper web site...
"My best 1/4 mile time was 11.42 @ 120.6 MPH."
Brian Dowling, who bought Brooks' car, never equalled his time. In fact, to the best of my knowlege, he never ran much better than a high 12 with the car. He inherited Brooks' web site with the purchase of the car and conveniently kept the same performance numbers. The 11.42 @ 120.6 mph listed for him was Brooks' best time, as mentioned above. The car was totalled, IIRC, some time in late 2000 or early 2001.
And finally, Kevin Wyum ran the 10.98 back in 1996.
Brooks Weisblat's car was sequential and his best run ever was an 11.42. In fact, he says so on his Viper web site...
"My best 1/4 mile time was 11.42 @ 120.6 MPH."
Brian Dowling, who bought Brooks' car, never equalled his time. In fact, to the best of my knowlege, he never ran much better than a high 12 with the car. He inherited Brooks' web site with the purchase of the car and conveniently kept the same performance numbers. The 11.42 @ 120.6 mph listed for him was Brooks' best time, as mentioned above. The car was totalled, IIRC, some time in late 2000 or early 2001.
And finally, Kevin Wyum ran the 10.98 back in 1996.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
immanuel__7
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
89
Sep 5, 2015 10:23 AM
befarrer
Microtech
3
Aug 22, 2015 05:52 PM
ncds_fc
New Member RX-7 Technical
1
Aug 15, 2015 10:06 AM
