3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

koyo vs fluidyne...HELP

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-25-03, 10:56 PM
  #1  
T-bird painter

Thread Starter
 
flyboyjuge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: nellis airforce base, las vegas
Posts: 827
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
koyo vs fluidyne...HELP

alright..im about to take the plunge into my first mods for the fd..im starting with downpipe, radiator, hiflo cat, catback...im wondering if koyo is a good radiator..or should i go with fluidyne since i see everyone else with one...please help me out..thanks julian
Old 05-25-03, 11:10 PM
  #2  
Full Member

 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I just installed my koyo about a week ago, it took a little bit modifications to get it to fit but nothing really that major. The koyo is larger than the fluidyne and cheaper. So I guess if you are willing to do a little modifying then go with the koyo, or just go with the fluidyne which I hear needs no modification.

~alan
Old 05-25-03, 11:18 PM
  #3  
The one
iTrader: (5)
 
Jason's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 3,862
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
If you are using the stock intercooler and intake there are some issues with it fitting. The fluidyne and the PWR are not as thick and fitment is better.
If you are wondering the fluidyne and PWR are identical except the PWR having a better finish (polish).

Jason
www.rx7store.net
Old 05-25-03, 11:30 PM
  #4  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
suprfast's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: home
Posts: 909
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
there we have it, last testimonial showing that product A is also product B for 100.00 more dollars.
koyo=SR
fuidyne=PWR
go with the koyo. i love mine. a search would yield me saying the same thing time and time again. i had no fitment issues. well i had to bend the lower tabs ever so slightly, but if that is what people consider modifying then...
im pretty sure that looking around will yield more comparisons between two companies having same parts. i doubt SR pullies are NOT UR. im not bad mouthing a company, just tired of hearing someone buying something, putting a polish and sticker on it and calling it theirs. whatever happened to copyrights, patents, and trademarks? i bet the Xmac is really a big mac with REAL BEEF. oh well, what are my two cents worth
kris
Old 05-25-03, 11:32 PM
  #5  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
suprfast's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: home
Posts: 909
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
by the way i fogot to add something...you may want to look for an ECU if you plan on doing those perforance mods. hiflo, CB, and DP could get ugly. for sure dont throw an intake in the bunch. id say skip the CB and get a PFC.(sorry for sounding negative right now. im doing HW and writing my trial by decleration for the idiot cop that gave me a ticket since he was at fault, now i have to prove it...GAY)
kris
Old 05-26-03, 12:49 AM
  #6  
GEB
Full Member

 
GEB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Back when I got mine Fluidyne it cost $415
The prices have obviously gone up since then. The Koyo at the time was $375 I have a buddy who has the same setup as me and he purchased the KOYO - his install took a lot longer than mine and he still has clearance problems....

Different strokes for different folks....I couldn't be any happier with my fluidyne. Either way, as long as you upgrade to an A/M unit and get rid of that POS OEM unit you'll be good to go brotha...

Good Luck
GEB
Old 05-26-03, 06:22 AM
  #7  
Classy

iTrader: (17)
 
evot23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 6,900
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
I've got a fluidyne, a couple of my friends have a Koyo. Our temps run about the same with both of us having similar mods.

I say go Fluidyne and save some bucks. Just my .02
Old 05-26-03, 06:35 AM
  #8  
Lives on the Forum

 
rxrotary2_7's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: southern NJ
Posts: 5,097
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
either or.... get rid of the POS OEM one. i personaly have a koyo at the moment.
Old 05-26-03, 10:56 AM
  #9  
Sensory Experience

 
Shinobi-X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: MD
Posts: 840
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Koyo works fine for me, and I have no fitment problems...
Old 05-26-03, 11:25 AM
  #10  
T-bird painter

Thread Starter
 
flyboyjuge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: nellis airforce base, las vegas
Posts: 827
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
lol...thanks everybody...kris ya crack me up...so too much mods can actually be harmful??im sorry im a retard? but what exactly does the "PFC" do?? and some guy told me to get a mid pipe instead of a hi flo..but wont that hurt me with emissions??? more help!!!!!!! but thanks everybody. julian
Old 05-26-03, 12:04 PM
  #11  
0 lbs of boost

iTrader: (1)
 
turbogarrett's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: wisconsin
Posts: 1,261
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
i would do koyo if you're planning on using a fmic, fluidyne for an upgraded smic. i have the koyo with an m2 large and the duct sits a little higher than it should, but still has a good seal around the ic and does not rub on the hood, so it's fine with me. the pfc is a standalone computer that replaces the stock ecu and would be a great option if you have somebody who can help you tune it otherwise consider a pettit or m2 ecu, which you can pick up used for around 400. no you won't be passing emissions with a midpipe!-garrett
Old 05-26-03, 04:31 PM
  #12  
Full Member

 
striker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I hear that a mid pipe gives you more horsepower higher up, but decreases the power in the lower rpms?
If this is true, wouldnt a highflow cat be better?
Old 05-26-03, 06:12 PM
  #13  
Rx7 Wagon

iTrader: (16)
 
Narfle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: California
Posts: 6,988
Received 875 Likes on 548 Posts
i sincerely doubt that you would loose and down low power by putting an mp on
the turbo puts plenty of backpressure on the exhaust
if you dont want boost creep id go with the highflow cat in the least
a few horsepower will be the least of your worries when yopu pop your engine with a mp
Old 05-26-03, 07:23 PM
  #14  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
suprfast's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: home
Posts: 909
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
get some sort of standalone and a midpipe. dont spend extra money on a hiflo. junk if you ask me. put the MP in and if you get spikes or creep throw a restrictor plate in. ive done this method and i still get FLAMES. big ones too. cant wait to see if taking the restrictor out would make more flames. blah, i need a WBO2
kris
Old 05-26-03, 11:22 PM
  #15  
T-bird painter

Thread Starter
 
flyboyjuge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: nellis airforce base, las vegas
Posts: 827
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
im worried about passing emissions though...what causes the flames...i want flames!!!!!!!!! haha
Old 05-27-03, 12:39 AM
  #16  
Senior Member

 
Juster's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Socal
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have the fluidyne radiator and it was pretty easy to install. fits in exactly the same place as the stock radiator does. didnt require much modification to get it in. good luck
Old 05-27-03, 01:55 AM
  #17  
The Dude Abides

 
neevosh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: san jose, ca
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I had a Fluidyne and had no problems with it. What I like about the it was that it has a brass drain plug, where the Koyo has the cheap plastic one. And the Koyo usually takes some minor modifying to install. The Koyo is about $75-100 cheaper, though.
Old 05-27-03, 09:30 AM
  #18  
STi Boxer power!

 
Scrapiron7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 2,160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am pretty sure they are both a good choice and you really can't go wrong with either of them. They are both much better and more reliable then the crappy stock radiator.
Old 05-27-03, 11:08 AM
  #19  
Sensory Experience

 
Shinobi-X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: MD
Posts: 840
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by flyboyjuge
im worried about passing emissions though...what causes the flames...i want flames!!!!!!!!! haha
Unburned fuel, and no restrictions in the exhaust path- which means you won't pass emissions.
Old 05-27-03, 11:39 AM
  #20  
Senior Member

 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Crescent City, CA
Posts: 295
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
THe fluidyne has a more efficiant core, but its not as thick as the Koyo. So... cooling capacity is really close.
If I had to do it over again, Id get the fluidyne because its a little lighter.
Old 05-27-03, 12:48 PM
  #21  
Ex fd *****

 
maxpesce's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Ventura CA USA
Posts: 1,782
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by Jason
If you are using the stock intercooler and intake there are some issues with it fitting. The fluidyne and the PWR are not as thick and fitment is better.
If you are wondering the fluidyne and PWR are identical except the PWR having a better finish (polish).

Jason
www.rx7store.net

Fluidyne & PWR may LOOK identical BUT the Flyidine is made in the USA by Fluidyne and the PWR is made in Austraila by PWR.
The Fluidyne uses a unique (patented) tube design (I believe they have internal turbulators) that improves heat transfer. PWR may licence Fluidyne's technology but I don't know if they do or not. They both look the same externally b/k the are both designed to be drop in replacements for the OEM unit.

Last edited by maxpesce; 05-27-03 at 12:52 PM.
Old 05-27-03, 01:45 PM
  #22  
Chicharrones Rule!!

 
enuttage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Back In Austin
Posts: 902
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My thought is also, "flip a coin".

I'm pretty heavily modified, using a Fluidyne, and having no problems. My summer autoX temps have gone from up to 109C last year without the new rad, down to a high of 91C this year, after multiple consecutive runs really flogging it.

A huge difference and great peace-of-mind.

I think either way, you're going to see an immense improvement over stock temperatures.

-E
Old 05-27-03, 01:52 PM
  #23  
Chicharrones Rule!!

 
enuttage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Back In Austin
Posts: 902
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My thought is also, "flip a coin".

I'm pretty heavily modified, using a Fluidyne, and having no problems. My summer autoX temps have gone from up to 109C last year without the new rad, down to a high of 91C this year, after multiple consecutive runs really flogging it.

A huge difference and great peace-of-mind.

I think either way, you're going to see an immense improvement over stock temperatures.

-E
Old 05-27-03, 06:03 PM
  #24  
Cheap Bastard

iTrader: (2)
 
adam c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: San Luis Obispo, Ca
Posts: 8,370
Received 50 Likes on 42 Posts
I bought the fluidyne because I didn't want ANY fitment issues. A couple bucks more was worth it for me.
Old 05-27-03, 06:22 PM
  #25  
T-bird painter

Thread Starter
 
flyboyjuge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: nellis airforce base, las vegas
Posts: 827
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
alright..i guess im gonna go with fluidyne...thanks everybody..


Quick Reply: koyo vs fluidyne...HELP



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:18 PM.