3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Interior Ergonomics

Old Dec 6, 2003 | 05:19 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
From: Alabama
Interior Ergonomics

Hi All. As you can tell from my post count, I'm new here. I'm interested in acquiring an RX7.

I have a question concerning the 3rd generation. How do the interior size and ergo's compare to the 2nd generation? I'm a big guy, 6'6", 290, and fit nicely in the 2nd generation 7's but find the 1st generations a little tight.

Thanks in advance. Great site. Rotory Rules.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2003 | 05:30 PM
  #2  
spurvo's Avatar
don't race, don't need to
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,292
Likes: 1
From: Tri-Cities, WA
You will find the FD (3rd gen) to be a bit tight for you. I drove an FC for a few years, and was always surprised at the amount of room inside that little car's body. I also really enjoyed the fact that EVERY control was right at my fingertips. Something Ford and Chevy STILL can't get right!

The FD is "tighter", in that they wrapped the interior around you. To those who feel claustrophobic in tight places in a car that's moving rapidly, the FD is a little worrisome. I personally LOVE the way the interior feels, though. All of the gauges and lights and buttons and such are pointed at the driver.

But... I'm right at 6' and 180 lbs, so I have room to spare. My dad is your size, and had trouble getting in and out, and his long legs really get in the way of the steering wheel that doesn't move up or down. So your best bet is of course to get in one and see what you think. Good luck!
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2003 | 06:58 PM
  #3  
AMRAAM4's Avatar
twinturboteddy ws my idol
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,347
Likes: 0
From: Elkton, MD
Well MrJP, being an Ergonomist I'd have to concur with spurvo. Everything is layed out very nice for a car of it's day, and I believe the somewhat tight interior was a direct design idea so as to make it feel like a true sports/race car. I am strong to believe that the design of this car used Japanese males as their interior anthropometric design population, therefore I'm sure your going to have some difficulty in the vehicle. Can you fit, sure, is it something that will be easy, probably not. I don't see any problem for you unless it would be a daily driver or something you are prone to dislike (i.e less than optimal spacial considerations)
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2003 | 07:06 PM
  #4  
clayne's Avatar
PV = nRT
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,250
Likes: 0
From: New Zealand (was California)
It really depends on your torso to leg ratio too.

There are some routes you can take to alleviate being on the taller end of the scale:

1. Race seats which go lower to the ground.
2. A non-sunroof/moonroof model.

I'm about 6'1-6'2 with an R1 and I don't hit the roof even with a helmet on, even using my stock seats.

That being said, it's also important you are able to sit in the car in a way which allows you to drive in a performance-oriented manner. This means no gangster-ride seat leaning or hands just reaching the steering wheel.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2003 | 07:23 PM
  #5  
rockshox's Avatar
-
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 624
Likes: 0
From: SF Bay Area
a smaller diameter D cut steering wheel can go a long way towards making things more comfortable if you have long legs.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2003 | 09:19 PM
  #6  
NM_Silverback's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: Las Cruces NM
I’m 5' 10“ but I have a sitting height for someone who is 6' 3" (short legs!) and I weight 200 lbs. I have to get into mine in a funny way, but once inside I can lean the seat back and not worry about hitting the roof. If my sitting height was a couple of inches higher I don’t think I would fit.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2003 | 09:22 PM
  #7  
adam c's Avatar
Cheap Bastard
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,368
Likes: 50
From: San Luis Obispo, Ca
The room in the FD is smaller than the first gen. It's not likely that you will fit comfortably in a stock FD. You will just have to try one out to know for sure.

If you have your heart set on one, you may be able to add an aftermarket seat/steering wheel to make it work. As someone else mentioned, try one without a sunroof.

Good luck
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2003 | 10:25 PM
  #8  
Zoomspeed's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,564
Likes: 1
From: Wichita, KS, USA
I've also heard of people takeing the seats off the rails and bolting them straight to the floor.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2003 | 03:56 AM
  #9  
skunks's Avatar
I'm a CF and poop smith
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,957
Likes: 1
From: Hawaii
Originally posted by spurvo
I personally LOVE the way the interior feels, though. All of the gauges and lights and buttons and such are pointed at the driver.
Good luck!
ditto

btw: passenger room is a lot more tight
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2003 | 12:42 PM
  #10  
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
From: Alabama
Thanks all. I fit quite well in the 2nd Gen 7's. Actually, it fits me better than any other car I've ever driven. I do, however, like the 3rd Gen better.

As mentioned above, I will have to find one and test drive. I just didn't want to waste someone's time showing it to me, as well as my time finding one, if I was sure I couldn't make it fit. Based on your comments above, and the web sites from some of the sponsers here, I have an idea as to how much adjustment I can have.

Again, thanks all. Great rides you have.
Reply


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:19 PM.