Injector O-Rings or Injectors?
Thread Starter
Recovering Miataholic
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,561
Likes: 50
From: Fountain Valley, CA
Injector O-Rings or Injectors?
Our '94 was leaking fuel into the engine compartment last year (2/15) so I tore it apart, bought 8 "new" OEM fuel injector O-rings and installed them. This cured the leakage into the engine compartment, and we still do not smell raw fuel under the hood. However, two thousand miles later (111893 miles) we have noticed pig rich exhaust fumes on cold starts, and yesterday the engine would not catch at all.
I ran the "hold the accelerator pedal to the floor to shut off the fuel injection and run the starter" routine, which was finally successful, with clouds of exhaust smoke (with oil) eventually tapering off and smooth running to follow. But now I'm thinking maybe those "new" (probably 22-year old, although sealed in plastic bags) BUNA-N rubber O-rings have once again "relaxed" and the lower O-rings are allowing gasoline past them into the rotor chambers.
Thing is, I don't know if it's the O-rings or the fuel injectors (stock originals). Either case, of course, results in tearing the engine compartment up again.
I do have a set of Viton O-rings, but they are a tad smaller in uncompressed OD than the OEM parts. Although Viton is great in retaining its compressive force over time and in the presence of petroleum products, I don't know if the initial oversize relative to the fuel distributor bores would be sufficient.
Any advice would be appreciated, thanks!
I ran the "hold the accelerator pedal to the floor to shut off the fuel injection and run the starter" routine, which was finally successful, with clouds of exhaust smoke (with oil) eventually tapering off and smooth running to follow. But now I'm thinking maybe those "new" (probably 22-year old, although sealed in plastic bags) BUNA-N rubber O-rings have once again "relaxed" and the lower O-rings are allowing gasoline past them into the rotor chambers.
Thing is, I don't know if it's the O-rings or the fuel injectors (stock originals). Either case, of course, results in tearing the engine compartment up again.
I do have a set of Viton O-rings, but they are a tad smaller in uncompressed OD than the OEM parts. Although Viton is great in retaining its compressive force over time and in the presence of petroleum products, I don't know if the initial oversize relative to the fuel distributor bores would be sufficient.
Any advice would be appreciated, thanks!
Thread Starter
Recovering Miataholic
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,561
Likes: 50
From: Fountain Valley, CA
More Info
Measured ODs on Leaking O-rings Feb. 2015
Primary Injectors
Upper O-rings: 21.47 mm and 21.31 mm
Fuel Distributor Bore: 22.05 mm
Lower O-rings: 13.53 mm and 13.14 mm
Fuel Distributor Bore: (not measured)
Secondary Injectors
Upper O-rings: 21.97 mm and 21.97 mm
Fuel Distributor Bore: 22.05 mm
Lower O-rings: 13.35 mm and 13.35 mm
Fuel Distributor Bore: (not measured)
Measured ODs on "new OEM O-rings"
"Free" ODs
Upper O-rings P/N NF01-13-ZG4: 22.4 mm (all 4)
Lower O-rings P/N NF01-13-ZG3: 14.43 mm
Installed ODs
Upper O-rings: 22.75 mm (all 4)
Lower O-rings: 14.64 mm (all 4)
Changes from "free" OD to "Installed" OD for the new OEM parts were:
Upper O-rings: 22.75 - 22.4 = 0.35 mm
Lower O-rings: 14.64-14.43 = 0.21 mm
which gives an interference fit for the new OEM parts of:
Upper O-rings: 22.75-22.05 = 0.7 mm (diameter)
Lower O-rings: (unknown since lower distributor bores were unmeasured)
Viton O-rings (unused)
"Free" ODs
Upper O-rings: 22.0 mm (all 4)
Lower O-rings: 13.9 mm (all 4)
Since no Viton O-rings were installed, I have no data on installed ODs.
If Viton O-rings had been installed, and the upper O-rings' ODs expanded the same as the OEM O-rings:
Upper O-rings (installed): 22.0 + 0.35 = 22.35 mm OD
Interference: 22.35 - 22.05 = 0.30 mm (diameter)
Lower O-rings: 13.9 + 0.21 = 14.11 mm OD (Probably not large enough to guarantee a seal)
Any comments? Thanks for reading!
Primary Injectors
Upper O-rings: 21.47 mm and 21.31 mm
Fuel Distributor Bore: 22.05 mm
Lower O-rings: 13.53 mm and 13.14 mm
Fuel Distributor Bore: (not measured)
Secondary Injectors
Upper O-rings: 21.97 mm and 21.97 mm
Fuel Distributor Bore: 22.05 mm
Lower O-rings: 13.35 mm and 13.35 mm
Fuel Distributor Bore: (not measured)
Measured ODs on "new OEM O-rings"
"Free" ODs
Upper O-rings P/N NF01-13-ZG4: 22.4 mm (all 4)
Lower O-rings P/N NF01-13-ZG3: 14.43 mm
Installed ODs
Upper O-rings: 22.75 mm (all 4)
Lower O-rings: 14.64 mm (all 4)
Changes from "free" OD to "Installed" OD for the new OEM parts were:
Upper O-rings: 22.75 - 22.4 = 0.35 mm
Lower O-rings: 14.64-14.43 = 0.21 mm
which gives an interference fit for the new OEM parts of:
Upper O-rings: 22.75-22.05 = 0.7 mm (diameter)
Lower O-rings: (unknown since lower distributor bores were unmeasured)
Viton O-rings (unused)
"Free" ODs
Upper O-rings: 22.0 mm (all 4)
Lower O-rings: 13.9 mm (all 4)
Since no Viton O-rings were installed, I have no data on installed ODs.
If Viton O-rings had been installed, and the upper O-rings' ODs expanded the same as the OEM O-rings:
Upper O-rings (installed): 22.0 + 0.35 = 22.35 mm OD
Interference: 22.35 - 22.05 = 0.30 mm (diameter)
Lower O-rings: 13.9 + 0.21 = 14.11 mm OD (Probably not large enough to guarantee a seal)
Any comments? Thanks for reading!
Thread Starter
Recovering Miataholic
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,561
Likes: 50
From: Fountain Valley, CA
Thanks to both for your comments. If I choose to test by priming the system with rails lifted, how do I keep gasoline from spraying everywhere? Do you know a good physical test setup that prevents that?
When I tested my rails for leaks on the weekend I just put a handful of paper towel around them and primed. You could use a small container and set the primary rail in it and wrap the secondaries in towels.
Just a thought
Mike
Just a thought
Mike
When I did mine a couple years back, I set them in a rectangler plastic container. One of my secondary had a pinched O-ring from PO, so yea gas was filling up the container pretty fast.
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
Recovering Miataholic
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,561
Likes: 50
From: Fountain Valley, CA
MSilk and ZE Power MX6, could you tell whether the leaks were coming from the injectors or the O-rings by watching the rails during the tests? (Looks to me like that might be hard to do.)
Thanks for your replies.
Thanks for your replies.
I was lucky and had no leaks, I had just got the injectors cleaned and all new o-rings so i was testing to make sure there were no leaks. What about getting someone in the car to turn the ignition on while you watch for a leak, wear goggles of course. That way if there is a leak you can catch it right away without pouring fuel all over the place.
The other thing you could try before pulling everything apart is putting a fuel pressure gauge inline and seeing if there is a fast pressure drop once you cycle the key (watch to see if it goes up to spec, and how long it stays there) per the FSM. If there is a fast drop just proceed with caution once you test the rails for leaks.
Good Luck
The other thing you could try before pulling everything apart is putting a fuel pressure gauge inline and seeing if there is a fast pressure drop once you cycle the key (watch to see if it goes up to spec, and how long it stays there) per the FSM. If there is a fast drop just proceed with caution once you test the rails for leaks.
Good Luck
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,833
Likes: 3,232
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
putting the rails in some clear container is totally fine too. with the f/p terminal jumped, the fuel pump will just run, and you can see if anything drips.
As j9fd3s mentioned, you can prime the system from the diagnostic box while watching the injectors at the same time. You should be able to tell if the gas is coming out from the side or in the middle, but if gas come out of the rail then I would just send them out for service.
Thread Starter
Recovering Miataholic
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,561
Likes: 50
From: Fountain Valley, CA
Right, I'm familiar with the Diagnostic Connector. Jump F/P to GND, then have someone turn the ignition key to the "Run" position, and fuel pump will turn on. In any case, car will be down for at least a couple of weeks; if the injectors are leaking there is that turnaround for having them cleaned and flow-tested; if it's the O-rings, will have to order those... it's a bummer that the O-rings I put in last year will have to be replaced again. Not sure I will trust new O-rings if that is the only problem.
I usually just leave the key in, then control the pump through the diagnostic box. I would just send them in for service in general, 112k is due for some cleaning, plus they install new O-ring as part of the service.
Thread Starter
Recovering Miataholic
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,561
Likes: 50
From: Fountain Valley, CA
OK, I ran the "Fuel Pressure Hold Inspection" test shown on page F-96 of my '94 Workshop Manual.
It says that after turning on the fuel pump for 10 seconds, turn it off and monitor the fuel pressure for 5 minutes. At the end of that period the pressure should be above 21 psi. And it says if the test fails, the problem is either the fuel pump hold pressure, the fuel pressure regulator, or fuel injector leakage.
So fuel pressure shot up to 42 psi instantly when the ignition key was turned, and stayed there. Turning off the key began dropping pressure down to about 30 psi over 3 minutes, and then the pressure stayed at 30 psi. At 10 minutes, pressure was 29 psi. So I'm guessing there is no leak at the fuel rail from either injectors or O-rings.
However, the manual on page F-97 says the pressure should be 36-38 psi. Is 42 psi too high? I have not yet started the engine since testing per the F-96 procedure.
Can I believe the results of this test show no injector problem? Maybe a grain of sand holding an injector open temporarily caused the flooding?
It says that after turning on the fuel pump for 10 seconds, turn it off and monitor the fuel pressure for 5 minutes. At the end of that period the pressure should be above 21 psi. And it says if the test fails, the problem is either the fuel pump hold pressure, the fuel pressure regulator, or fuel injector leakage.
So fuel pressure shot up to 42 psi instantly when the ignition key was turned, and stayed there. Turning off the key began dropping pressure down to about 30 psi over 3 minutes, and then the pressure stayed at 30 psi. At 10 minutes, pressure was 29 psi. So I'm guessing there is no leak at the fuel rail from either injectors or O-rings.
However, the manual on page F-97 says the pressure should be 36-38 psi. Is 42 psi too high? I have not yet started the engine since testing per the F-96 procedure.
Can I believe the results of this test show no injector problem? Maybe a grain of sand holding an injector open temporarily caused the flooding?
Does the car only do this during cold starts?
Have you upgraded the fuel pump? (I am thinking for the higher pressure?)
When did you change plugs last?
Some small piece of grit may have got stuck but it would have to be extremely small. If anything it could be some fuel varnish causing an injector to stick especially if the car sits for extended periods of time and the fuel starts to go bad.
With the car passing the fuel leak down test I don't think what ever was leaking is still leaking. Might be another issue, you could try cleaning the IAC, and checking TPS voltages (I am thinking that maybe the car is not getting enough air for a cold start so it floods)
I hope this helps and I am not steering you in the wrong direction.
Mike
Have you upgraded the fuel pump? (I am thinking for the higher pressure?)
When did you change plugs last?
Some small piece of grit may have got stuck but it would have to be extremely small. If anything it could be some fuel varnish causing an injector to stick especially if the car sits for extended periods of time and the fuel starts to go bad.
With the car passing the fuel leak down test I don't think what ever was leaking is still leaking. Might be another issue, you could try cleaning the IAC, and checking TPS voltages (I am thinking that maybe the car is not getting enough air for a cold start so it floods)
I hope this helps and I am not steering you in the wrong direction.
Mike
Thread Starter
Recovering Miataholic
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,561
Likes: 50
From: Fountain Valley, CA
Does the car only do this during cold starts?
Have you upgraded the fuel pump? (I am thinking for the higher pressure?)
When did you change plugs last?
Have you upgraded the fuel pump? (I am thinking for the higher pressure?)
When did you change plugs last?
Car is driven 2K miles per year or so, strictly street use. The IAC does OK controlling the idle speed both during fast idle and when warm. I've set it for 700+ rpm warm. Have checked TPS voltages (a long time ago) and they were all in spec. The air filter was changed about 5000 miles ago. The air intake system is OEM.
I would pull the plugs and take a look at them, 22,000 miles seems like a lot on one set of plugs. I change mine every three years and put the same mileage on my car (I pulled them last year and they were fine so popped em back in)
If you pull your plugs check the spark plug leads too, just to make sure nothing has chaffed though ect.
I am starting to run out of ideas lol if it is slow at work today I will do some more head scratching
Mike
If you pull your plugs check the spark plug leads too, just to make sure nothing has chaffed though ect.
I am starting to run out of ideas lol if it is slow at work today I will do some more head scratching

Mike
Thread Starter
Recovering Miataholic
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,561
Likes: 50
From: Fountain Valley, CA
I am starting to run out of ideas lol if it is slow at work today I will do some more head scratching
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post







