3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

ideal compression

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 3, 2002 | 07:57 PM
  #1  
KINETIK_FD3S's Avatar
Thread Starter
almost done
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,049
Likes: 0
From: 250 HZ
Question ideal compression

hey guys, could anyone tell me whats the ideal compression on a 3rd gen rx7 and if matters a lot if the front and rear compression is different. thanks a lot guys.
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2002 | 08:20 PM
  #2  
rynberg's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 10
From: San Lorenzo, California
anything over 7kg/cm^2 or 100 psi is good (under standard conditions of 0 elevation and 250 cranking rpm)

More important is that all six rotor faces have consistent compression. Check the service manual for the exact specs. Also, most motors fail by coolant seals, not apex seals. A compression check is good info but does not mean the engine is 100% ok.
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2002 | 09:20 PM
  #3  
jr's Avatar
jr
Senior Member
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 741
Likes: 1
From: Queens, NY
Perfect would be around 9.0 and I believe Mazda says less than 6.0 is out of spec. No more than .3 variance between faces on the same rotor and no more than .5 between the 2 rotors.
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2002 | 11:54 PM
  #4  
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
From: Saint Louis, Mo
Is there any way to check the coolant seals?

Mike
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2002 | 01:40 AM
  #5  
Nathan Kwok's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,025
Likes: 4
From: Huntington Beach, CA, USA
Perfect is 8.5kg/cm^2 or 120psi, as per the shop manual. Everyone thinks "9.0" (I assume 9.0kg/cm^2) is perfect for some reason but this is not correct. The car has a 9.0:1 compression ratio but that is not the same thing. I agree on the importance of the consistancy between faces as a better indicator, as the overall numbers have been proven to vary by quite a bit.
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2002 | 09:37 PM
  #6  
TwinTriangles's Avatar
What's an RX-7 ?
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 921
Likes: 0
From: MN
I always heard 90psi or above is pretty much perfect... I checked compression after getting a street ported engine from pettit with the 3mm apex seals and it ran 90-90-90 and 90-89-90... I dunno...
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2002 | 11:06 PM
  #7  
Nathan Kwok's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,025
Likes: 4
From: Huntington Beach, CA, USA
The number's I'm quoting are out of the shop manual so they are correct, but don't get too hung up on them. Your numbers sound plenty good, imho it is more important for the numbers to be consistant across the 6 faces than to be high, because a lot of factors can affect the absolute numbers. Also, 3mm seals don't seal as well at low rpms because they are heavier and wider so that will yield lower numbers. Lastly, you may see compression go up a bit as the engine breaks in, I'd get another check in 5000 miles and see if it goes up. A common misconception is that a street port will lower compression, this is not true. It will lower your vacuum at idle but during a compression test, peak compression occurs when both ports are closed so it shouldn't matter. I'll have to check up on this but I'm pretty sure about it.

Last edited by Nathan Kwok; Jul 23, 2002 at 11:09 PM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
turbodreamz22
General Rotary Tech Support
28
Nov 10, 2023 11:08 AM
Andrew7dg
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
3
Aug 6, 2017 01:41 PM
WANKfactor
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
6
Sep 29, 2015 01:14 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:52 AM.