3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

I hate non sequential

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 15, 2007 | 12:53 AM
  #1  
TheWoganSleeve's Avatar
Thread Starter
The Sleeve
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
From: merseyside
I hate non sequential

My sequential FD seemed to be so much more driveable and fun than my non which i have now.

I used to be able to nip round roundabouts in second with the backend flying out with lots of low tourque, with my non id have to be doing about 4500 rpm to make it step out, which i dont fancy at all as id be going to fast.

Shame Shame

What are the advantages supposed to be again???????????????
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2007 | 01:31 AM
  #2  
s-thetikz's Avatar
4 rotor 964 lol
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 0
From: SoCA/ MA
reliability in the sense that they are easy to work with and diagnose problems with. if you don't like it, go back to sequential. if you don't want to, go with a single turbo.
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2007 | 01:41 AM
  #3  
trainwreck517's Avatar
Rx-hippie
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,076
Likes: 0
From: Torrance CA
Why did you go non-seq? Seq is really fun for street driving.. Although I really like the non-seq system because it has a nice linear power band.. and I don't have to worry about my *** kicking out when I Auto cross, or track days when the secondary kicks in...

I can get 10psi by 3400rpms, and 12psi by 4k... And start to build boost by 2krpms and really love the non-seq setup.. But I do miss that instant boost at low rpms... but not a big deal though.

And I can kick out my *** any in the corners if I really want to... even with my r-compounds.. But the question is why would you want to?

Anyways.. just got back to seq, or go with a small single turbo .. BB 60-1.. Gt35r...0.82/0.86 A/R housing.. etc.
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2007 | 02:01 AM
  #4  
snub disphenoid's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,116
Likes: 1
From: Northern California
I'm gonna run non-sequential for a little bit, just to see what it's like. I don't enjoy tearing the top end of my engine apart every few weeks to see which solenoid is ******* up on which day.
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2007 | 02:08 AM
  #5  
elfking's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 782
Likes: 3
From: Sonoma, CA
Originally Posted by snub disphenoid
I'm gonna run non-sequential for a little bit, just to see what it's like. I don't enjoy tearing the top end of my engine apart every few weeks to see which solenoid is ******* up on which day.
Thats why I just replaced both, havent had a problem.
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2007 | 02:13 AM
  #6  
Speedworks's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,890
Likes: 4
From: Belgium
shift down.
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2007 | 02:36 AM
  #7  
spandy's Avatar
Patience
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,483
Likes: 0
From: Oregon
What really is the point of going non-seq? Doesn't it take a hell of a lot longer to make boost? If so I would assume this would be good for a track situation as you would probably want to stay on top of the rpms and in the power band, but crap for the streets.
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2007 | 02:44 AM
  #8  
DriftDreamzSS's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,236
Likes: 4
From: Ventura
kick the clutch
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2007 | 02:57 AM
  #9  
Speedworks's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,890
Likes: 4
From: Belgium
Just go check for yourself how much time you spend with the car under 3000-3500 rpm. Only in the city or short turns. The only reason you want to have quick boost is probably to show of the car can drift or the make people know your car has a dump valve.

You spend much more time on the open street or highway hitting rpm's higher than 3000-3500rpm, hitting boost fast enough for easy or 'spirited' driving.

Otherwise, shift down more regulalry, it isn't an automatic you know...
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2007 | 04:35 AM
  #10  
snub disphenoid's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,116
Likes: 1
From: Northern California
I do like the torque of the car when it's running non-sequential. Going 60mph in 5th, then flooring it and getting to 70mph in less than 2 seconds is handy.
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2007 | 08:15 AM
  #11  
jsplit's Avatar
Do It! Do It!
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,994
Likes: 0
From: Crofton, MD
Originally Posted by TheWoganSleeve
My sequential FD seemed to be so much more driveable and fun than my non which i have now.

I used to be able to nip round roundabouts in second with the backend flying out with lots of low tourque, with my non id have to be doing about 4500 rpm to make it step out, which i dont fancy at all as id be going to fast.

Shame Shame

What are the advantages supposed to be again???????????????
Did you do the poor mans version or something? 4500 is way too late unless you messed something up.
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2007 | 08:36 AM
  #12  
MisawaJason's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
From: Misawa Air Base, Japan
Makes me think twice about doing the N/S mod and just keep them seq. until I go single
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2007 | 12:33 PM
  #13  
1QWIK7's Avatar
White chicks > *
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,147
Likes: 1
From: Secaucus, New Jersey
Originally Posted by jsplit
Did you do the poor mans version or something? 4500 is way too late unless you messed something up.
Either that or he kept the main cat.

I kepy my main cat and im non seq, i see full boost around 4500 myself.

Makes city driving a true pain.
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2007 | 03:07 PM
  #14  
TheWoganSleeve's Avatar
Thread Starter
The Sleeve
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
From: merseyside
I aint looked as im lazy but i was told both cats have been removed and its damn loud, teh car does boost before 4500 but no where near as nicely with the seq setup
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2007 | 03:18 PM
  #15  
Authentikdit's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 521
Likes: 0
From: West Palm Beach,FL
Originally Posted by TheWoganSleeve
I aint looked as im lazy but i was told both cats have been removed and its damn loud, teh car does boost before 4500 but no where near as nicely with the seq setup
Laziness=Problems bound to occur..
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2007 | 03:19 PM
  #16  
MADDSLOW's Avatar
17 second FD
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2,436
Likes: 1
From: Poughkeepsie, New York
How much boost are you getting before 4500? When I had a shop do my conversion, they had forgotten to weld the flange open, and I wouldn't get more than 2-3psi before 4500, then it would shoot up to 10 in an instant. Maybe you should go over the conversion and make sure everything was done correctly?
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2007 | 04:24 PM
  #17  
Speedworks's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,890
Likes: 4
From: Belgium
when goin non seq it's beneficial to ahve an aftermarket DP, CB at least and intakes. Streetport will help a lot also.

Don't think just going non seq without the rest will bring you the holy grale of boost. Otherwise Mazda had done it in the first place.
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2007 | 04:27 PM
  #18  
tragic00's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 436
Likes: 0
From: ft. myers, fl
its all about reliability with rotaries man. with a non seq setup you go from like 70 hoses to 7, its so much easier to work with, and it has the reliability like a single turbo. i drift my car at events and instant boost seems necessary to be capable of drifting in an instant, but when it comes to driving like that its just you got to know how to drive it, if your under 4500 rpms when your entering a turn clutch kick or e brake its not like you gotta power over on every turn, theres a lot of perks for non seq setup. my friend is making almost 400hp on his non seq setup on stock turbos, they can handle boost a little better too.
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2007 | 06:44 PM
  #19  
TheWoganSleeve's Avatar
Thread Starter
The Sleeve
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
From: merseyside
Ah right my car has all the mods mentioned to help with the non seq
and i do understand the reliability issues, its just from a day to day point of view my car is so loud id like low rev action so people dont hear me turn watch me screaming sideways with slots of noise and smoke around town etc then report me to the police for driving like a ****, which they wouldnt do if it was done in a gentlemanly way,

I suggest dont change until you start having problems, my last rd was non and i done 4000 miles in the month i had it with nay probs.

cheeky slide cheeky slide (y)
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2007 | 06:45 PM
  #20  
TheWoganSleeve's Avatar
Thread Starter
The Sleeve
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
From: merseyside
Thumbs up

sorry my last fd was seq not a non
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2007 | 06:48 PM
  #21  
adam c's Avatar
Cheap Bastard
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,370
Likes: 50
From: San Luis Obispo, Ca
Originally Posted by snub disphenoid
I do like the torque of the car when it's running non-sequential. Going 60mph in 5th, then flooring it and getting to 70mph in less than 2 seconds is handy.
My 02 CRV (bone stock) will do that
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2007 | 06:49 PM
  #22  
1QWIK7's Avatar
White chicks > *
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,147
Likes: 1
From: Secaucus, New Jersey
Originally Posted by TheWoganSleeve
I aint looked as im lazy but i was told both cats have been removed and its damn loud, teh car does boost before 4500 but no where near as nicely with the seq setup

Well look under the car, you'll know for sure if both cats are removed. At least you can eliminate that as a potential factor in why you're boosting at 4500rpm.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ls1swap
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
17
Jun 3, 2024 03:25 PM
Snook
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
17
Feb 27, 2021 02:54 PM
HalifaxFD
Canadian Forum
126
May 9, 2016 07:06 PM
Snook
Single Turbo RX-7's
39
Oct 4, 2015 08:47 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:38 AM.