3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

how much HP could I get out of my Stock FD just with a PFC?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 6, 2004 | 02:59 PM
  #1  
spekdah's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,003
Likes: 0
From: New Zealand
how much HP could I get out of my Stock FD just with a PFC?

I dun a search but to no avail
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2004 | 03:07 PM
  #2  
SpeedKing's Avatar
Power Trippin'
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,128
Likes: 1
From: Land of The Quick
What's the point of spending $1000+ for something the stock ECU does for free?
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2004 | 03:14 PM
  #3  
spekdah's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,003
Likes: 0
From: New Zealand
what, so the stock ECU can alter your ignition and fuel maps?
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2004 | 03:20 PM
  #4  
SiKoPaThX's Avatar
Porque tan serio?
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,932
Likes: 0
From: St. Petersburg, FL
no, but the point is, why pay that much for something you don't need right now?
I couldn't imagine getting THAT much more power. I would also guess that with a stock setup, the stock ECU would be more reliable as far as fuel delivery.
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2004 | 03:21 PM
  #5  
spoolin93r1's Avatar
Rotary Freak
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,625
Likes: 0
From: Salem, IN
there are gains to be made. with just a full exhaust, a power fc, and the boost on 15psi, i put down 313whp. that's around 100 more to the wheels than stock. only bad thing is, the stock intercooler sucks for that much boost
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2004 | 03:27 PM
  #6  
SpeedKing's Avatar
Power Trippin'
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,128
Likes: 1
From: Land of The Quick
Originally Posted by spekdah

what, so the stock ECU can alter your ignition and fuel maps?
At best, you'd lose the 3K hesitation (if you have it), and maybe get *slightly* better drivability.

Most people get the PowerFC to accomodate higher boost levels w/ more mods. For a stock car, it's pointless to have.
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2004 | 03:29 PM
  #7  
cloud9's Avatar
The bomb is in the toy!1!
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,229
Likes: 292
From: Dallas Tx.
down the road a PFC is required anyway (basically) so why not get it first, no harm can be done.
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2004 | 04:54 PM
  #8  
BLKTOPTRVL's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,817
Likes: 16
From: South Carolina
The harm is that you are paying now for something you may not ever need in the future. You never know what might happen to the car before you need the ecu.
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2004 | 05:00 PM
  #9  
spekdah's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,003
Likes: 0
From: New Zealand
yeah, basically I'm selling one and I got guy who has a stock FD which he is going to trick out so he was asking me how much HP he could get stock before he does his FD up
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2004 | 05:41 PM
  #10  
turbojeff's Avatar
Do it right, do it once
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,830
Likes: 14
From: Eugene, OR, usa
Getting more HP from a stock FD with the PFC will just reduce any level of safety margin in tuning the stock ECU has.

The stock IC is not too good, so intake temps are high, with the PFC you can raise the boost and make intake temps even hotter.

The stock ECU also runs pig rich under boost, you could lean it out and get some more power. Advancing the timing is probably a similar story, the PFC will allow changes that will probably result in more HP.

Doing any of the mods like this will reduce the stock engine life, possibly killing it the same day you "tune" the PFC for more HP on the stock car.
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2004 | 06:11 PM
  #11  
Icemastr's Avatar
All Motor
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,604
Likes: 0
From: Redmond, WA
220rwhp.
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2004 | 06:31 PM
  #12  
estrada42's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
From: Nor Cal
Originally Posted by spoolin93r1
there are gains to be made. with just a full exhaust, a power fc, and the boost on 15psi, i put down 313whp. that's around 100 more to the wheels than stock. only bad thing is, the stock intercooler sucks for that much boost
Out of curiosity, how long do you suppose a relativly fresh engine could last under those conditions? What if a FMIC and a good radiator were added to the mix?
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2004 | 06:47 PM
  #13  
spoolin93r1's Avatar
Rotary Freak
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,625
Likes: 0
From: Salem, IN
Originally Posted by estrada42
Out of curiosity, how long do you suppose a relativly fresh engine could last under those conditions? What if a FMIC and a good radiator were added to the mix?
with a front mount, it would probably be fine. my afr was 11.5 and under. i popped my original motor, but i'm still thinking it was due to age and the stock intercooler. that was also non-sequential
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2004 | 07:20 PM
  #14  
birdy01's Avatar
Birds can DRIFT YO...!!!!
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 697
Likes: 1
From: California
Originally Posted by BLKTOPTRVL
The harm is that you are paying now for something you may not ever need in the future. You never know what might happen to the car before you need the ecu.
yea and wen later on down the road it'll cost u 500 instead of 1000
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cristoDathird
Introduce yourself
28
May 30, 2019 08:47 PM
torky007
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
7
Aug 17, 2015 05:14 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:41 PM.