3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Guys with lightweight flywheels...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 27, 2007 | 06:55 PM
  #26  
neofreak's Avatar
accept no imitations™
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,096
Likes: 0
From: san francisco
Originally Posted by FDNewbie
Generally speaking, light flywheels aren't really an issue if you're on a level surface. Take 'er up on a considerable hill, come to a dead stop, and try engaging *without* riding. THEN you'll see where streetability of light flywheels drops. Other than that really, I LOVE light flywheels. They make rev matching a dream

~Ramy
Or you can live in San Francisco and drive on hills everyday. It isn't *that* big of a deal with my 8.5lb flywheel. On real steep hills I'll use the e-brake or ride the clutch a little bit.
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2007 | 07:01 PM
  #27  
justturbo2's Avatar
Registered User
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,576
Likes: 0
From: new york
i have streetlite act flywheel and there was a difference. i would imagine the prolite you would feel a big difference.
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2007 | 07:16 PM
  #28  
skir2222's Avatar
I win
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,875
Likes: 2
From: NJ
I can't wait to get my build done so I can input my personal opinion on the difference.
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2007 | 07:36 PM
  #29  
tiger18's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 911
Likes: 0
From: UK
Can i ask you guys whats the performance of the car feel like when you install a 12lb flywheel,, does the car accelerate much quicker?
Im thinking of going 12lb flywheel and an ACT street strip clutch (dont want to go down the 4/6 puck route , i hate driving them clutches),, trying to maintain some pedal pressure without the need of steriod injections in my legs, lol
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2007 | 07:52 PM
  #30  
Narfle's Avatar
Rx7 Wagon
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 6,978
Likes: 888
From: California
Originally Posted by FDNewbie
Honestly? My guess is 99% you're riding the clutch upon engagement. I've ridden with MANY FD owners, and you'd be surprised how few of them actually know how to drive lol. Lots of riding, lots of slow/inaccurate shifting, etc.
I respect your opinion and business, but honestly who made you local driving instructor/critic? The driveability would have way more to do with the pressure plate than the clutch type itself. There is no reason a stock pressure plate, sprung 6 puck with a lightweight flywheel wouldnt be completely streetable. Riding the clutch produces immediate and significant symptoms(ie; clutch fade and burnt clutch smell).
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2007 | 08:51 PM
  #31  
Cgotto6's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,996
Likes: 60
From: Maltby, Washington
Ha, its funny if you guys are worried about riding the clutch a little bit. You dont actually think the clutch wont outlast the rebuild, do you? Haha, only joking...I hope.
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2007 | 09:03 PM
  #32  
dradon03's Avatar
Derwin
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,888
Likes: 0
From: MTL, QC
I find myself also sometimes reving toomuch and it took me about a day to get used to.
If anything I find it alot easier to be smooth with the clutch. But shifts are much easier and getting into a corner is alot funner.

FWIW I got a ACT Prolite w/ OEM counterweight.
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2007 | 09:18 PM
  #33  
FDNewbie's Avatar
Sponsor
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,216
Likes: 4
From: Tampa, FL
Originally Posted by Eggie
That jerk tells you the clutch wasn't really engaged, no?
Negative. The FD is jerky when shifting at low rpms. That's how the car came. In fact, it's one of the reasons why one of the magazines (MT or C&D) marked it down in a back-to-back comparison of many cars because it was very jerky. It either sat there or wanted to go...not much in between hehe

Originally Posted by neofreak
Or you can live in San Francisco and drive on hills everyday. It isn't *that* big of a deal with my 8.5lb flywheel. On real steep hills I'll use the e-brake or ride the clutch a little bit.
I feel for you man. I've heard about Frisco's hills. Screw that lol. And yea I've used the e-brake trick a few times, esp. when I don't have any wiggle room (guy behind you is riding your bumper).

Originally Posted by Barban
I respect your opinion and business
Thanks, but that has nothing to do w/ this convo. I'm not selling anything

but honestly who made you local driving instructor/critic?
I'm self-proclaimed...didn'tcha know? Relax bud. My opinion/$0.02/call-it-whatever-you-want is just that: MY perception. I don't claim to be the next Skip Barber, but that doesn't mind I'm running around blind either When you've been taught, studied, and practiced certain things, the skill becomes second-nature to you, and you quickly notice a deviation from it. A simple example...to date, I have yet to jump in the car with one of our fellow FD owners and notice seamless and quick rev matching - and that's assuming they rev match to begin with. It grabs my attention VERY quickly, probably b/c I don't know how to drive WITHOUT rev matching. I do it unconsciously.

Oh and not that I use it as a benchmark, but just to indulge you, I've ridden with and drove Steve Kan around (who's a very accomplished driver w/ a whole rack of awards & trophies mind you), and managed to illicit a few compliments from him Call it beginner's luck

The driveability would have way more to do with the pressure plate than the clutch type itself. There is no reason a stock pressure plate, sprung 6 puck with a lightweight flywheel wouldnt be completely streetable.
I wouldn't wanna run around w/ a stock pressure plate in such a circumstance. If you're running a puck clutch, the automatic assumption is you're using it for quick & immediate engagement, such as in drag racing. In such circumstances, clamping force is *everything* so I'd really think you'd want a heavy duty pressure plate (which translates to greater clamping force).

Also, sprung clutches are traditionally easier to engage, which more than likely translates to less clutch riding.

Riding the clutch produces immediate and significant symptoms(ie; clutch fade and burnt clutch smell).
That's if you REALLY ride it...slipping it a good bit usually doesn't produce the burnt smell.

But then again, I'm not a local driving instructor/critic, so feel free to dispose of my posts promptly

Originally Posted by Cgotto6
Ha, its funny if you guys are worried about riding the clutch a little bit. You dont actually think the clutch wont outlast the rebuild, do you? Haha, only joking...I hope.
LOL oh man. That's just bad. I sure hope my motor outlives my clutch...
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2007 | 11:31 PM
  #34  
GoodfellaFD3S's Avatar
Original Gangster/Rotary!
Veteran: Army
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (213)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 30,804
Likes: 646
From: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
A-rod, the differences between the heavy stock flywheel and a lightened flywheel are night and day. Revs will jump up and fall down much more quickly, and rev-matching is much much easier. Acceleration in the lower gears is also improved. Not too long ago I made the switch in my fc vert, so it's fresh in my mind......going way back to around 2000, when I had a light fw installed in my FD, I remember thinking that the acceleration difference in first and second gear was more than the difference from my intake and catback combined......
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2007 | 11:49 PM
  #35  
v8huntr's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
From: virginia
go with exedy twin disk and you'll never thing twice.
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2007 | 11:50 PM
  #36  
MADDSLOW's Avatar
Thread Starter
17 second FD
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2,436
Likes: 1
From: Poughkeepsie, New York
^^Well, I just don't feel it. I almost feel like I could have spent my money on something else.

btw, I'm also using the HD PP... People really put 6 pucks on stock PPs?!
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2007 | 12:08 AM
  #37  
FDNewbie's Avatar
Sponsor
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,216
Likes: 4
From: Tampa, FL
Hey Rich...just to clear the air, my comment doesn't include you, as I've only ridden along w/ ya once, and given the circumstances that immediately preceded it (not to mention which state we were in), it was prob. prudent to take it easy lol.
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2007 | 07:41 AM
  #38  
GoodfellaFD3S's Avatar
Original Gangster/Rotary!
Veteran: Army
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (213)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 30,804
Likes: 646
From: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Originally Posted by FDNewbie
Hey Rich...just to clear the air, my comment doesn't include you, as I've only ridden along w/ ya once, and given the circumstances that immediately preceded it (not to mention which state we were in), it was prob. prudent to take it easy lol.
It's all good man. I have plans (mua hua hua) to start frequently road racing my FD within the near future, so as to develop some ramalux driving skillz
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2007 | 08:18 AM
  #39  
BobfisH's Avatar
RX7 lover
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,160
Likes: 3
From: UK
Why are you trying to pull away without slipping the clutch?

thats what its for, and thats what its designed to do. At a minimum you have to get the car moving at least at the speed the car will be doing in first gear at the revs your doing before completely disengaging the clutch, otherwise your just shock loading your drivetrain.

Why try and pull away without giving the car any throttle and without slipping the clutch? I Dont get it... I know what your saying about reducing wear but as previously stated, your clutch will probably outlast your rebuild, and the clutch is designed to slip! If it wasnt, it wouldnt be two discs and a friction material. Itd be...well, i dunno what itd be, but itd be designed differently :P
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2007 | 08:24 AM
  #40  
BobfisH's Avatar
RX7 lover
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,160
Likes: 3
From: UK
a little quote earlier from Ramy...with my comments...


- If the revs jump up a bit between shifts then your not taking your foot off the accelerator before pressing the clutch, its got nothing to do with riding the clutch
- If you feel almost a lurch forward between shifts, when shifting normally then your either keeping the gas floored, pressing the clutch then coming off the gas or giving it too much gas before foot off clutch in the next gear.
- You engage the clutch from a dig at like 2,000 rpm (I can essentially engage the clutch and get moving with very little increase in rpms, if at all from idle). This one is a great clue, as to (subconsciously) mask poor engagement skill, ppl tend to over-rev upon engagement. i dont know what a dig is, but i disagree with the rest of the statement. Over-reving does not mask poor engagement skill, it gives you a smooth pull away. Basically what your saying is that people who have poor clutch control will over ref, thus stopping them stalling the car or getting a jerky pull away. Yet you then go on to say that you dont give the car any revs and dont slip the clutch at all on pull away on purpose, which makes the pull away very jerky?

Im really confused. why would you do this? am i reading this wrong?
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2007 | 01:32 PM
  #41  
afterburn27's Avatar
Lets Go Hokies!
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,727
Likes: 4
From: Greenville, SC
Originally Posted by BobfisH
Why are you trying to pull away without slipping the clutch?

thats what its for, and thats what its designed to do. At a minimum you have to get the car moving at least at the speed the car will be doing in first gear at the revs your doing before completely disengaging the clutch, otherwise your just shock loading your drivetrain.

Why try and pull away without giving the car any throttle and without slipping the clutch? I Dont get it... I know what your saying about reducing wear but as previously stated, your clutch will probably outlast your rebuild, and the clutch is designed to slip! If it wasnt, it wouldnt be two discs and a friction material. Itd be...well, i dunno what itd be, but itd be designed differently :P
+1

Obviously you don't want to ride the clutch at 4k RPM every stoplight. But it is designed to slip a little, I wouldn't worry about clutch wear too much.

And why are you so scared of changing the clutch? lol it is easy
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2007 | 02:54 PM
  #42  
FDNewbie's Avatar
Sponsor
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,216
Likes: 4
From: Tampa, FL
Originally Posted by GoodfellaFD3S
It's all good man. I have plans (mua hua hua) to start frequently road racing my FD within the near future, so as to develop some ramalux driving skillz
Ramalux driving skillz I like that Rich. Ramulux Motorsports lol.

Originally Posted by BobfisH
Why are you trying to pull away without slipping the clutch?

thats what its for, and thats what its designed to do. At a minimum you have to get the car moving at least at the speed the car will be doing in first gear at the revs your doing before completely disengaging the clutch, otherwise your just shock loading your drivetrain.
I'm not. I agree with you. What I'm saying is, some ppl don't slip it really...they RIDE it (ie car is already in motion, but they continue to hold the clutch a bit longer).

Why try and pull away without giving the car any throttle and without slipping the clutch? I Dont get it...
I don't do that normally LOL. I mentioned that in the context of (which I stated btw) that that's how I LEARNED how to drive stick. It all comes down to clutch control and learning the clutch "sweet spot." If you can find the sweet spot, adjust the pedal as necessary so you're comfortable at that sweet spot, then you won't be under or over using the clutch during shifting/engaging. That's all. Not that hard

I know what your saying about reducing wear but as previously stated, your clutch will probably outlast your rebuild, and the clutch is designed to slip! If it wasnt, it wouldnt be two discs and a friction material. Itd be...well, i dunno what itd be, but itd be designed differently :P
I'm NOT promoting not slipping the clutch. Not sure where you got that idea. I'm talking about straight RIDING it. For seconds at a time.

Originally Posted by BobfisH
a little quote earlier from Ramy...with my comments...


- If the revs jump up a bit between shifts then your not taking your foot off the accelerator before pressing the clutch, its got nothing to do with riding the clutch
That's ONE scenario. The other scenario that will STILL produce a rev jump b/w shifts is if you're off the gas, drop the clutch, shift, get back on the gas, and don't let off the clutch soon enough. You essentially are RE-applying throttle while your fit is still on the clutch. You are indeed RIDING the clutch. You need to release the clutch much sooner. This is the MOST COMMON rookie mistake I see when ppl are new to driving stick.

- If you feel almost a lurch forward between shifts, when shifting normally then your either keeping the gas floored, pressing the clutch then coming off the gas or giving it too much gas before foot off clutch in the next gear.
Point is, it's wrong

- You engage the clutch from a dig at like 2,000 rpm (I can essentially engage the clutch and get moving with very little increase in rpms, if at all from idle). This one is a great clue, as to (subconsciously) mask poor engagement skill, ppl tend to over-rev upon engagement. i dont know what a dig is
From a stop

but i disagree with the rest of the statement. Over-reving does not mask poor engagement skill, it gives you a smooth pull away. Basically what your saying is that people who have poor clutch control will over ref, thus stopping them stalling the car or getting a jerky pull away. Yet you then go on to say that you dont give the car any revs and dont slip the clutch at all on pull away on purpose, which makes the pull away very jerky?
If you and I were in the same car (for example), and it took you to 3,500 rpm to be able to slip, RIDE, and engage the clutch correctly for a smooth pullaway, and I could do it at 1,200 rpm, then yes it INDEED is poor clutch control. That's what I'm talking about. Ppl over-rev to mask that poor clutch control. They ride. It's not slipping. Slipping is what you're doin at 1,200 to keep it smooth.

Im really confused. why would you do this? am i reading this wrong?
Apparently?
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2007 | 03:43 PM
  #43  
XxMerlinxX's Avatar
Team Benjos Captain
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,720
Likes: 1
From: Greenwood/Hartsville, SC.
Originally Posted by MADDSLOW
^^Well, I just don't feel it. I almost feel like I could have spent my money on something else.

btw, I'm also using the HD PP... People really put 6 pucks on stock PPs?!
You should feel it the most, mid-high range of the powerband, in first gear. Less is 2nd and so on and so forth. My first gears mid-high end really picked up when I added the prolite flywheel.
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2007 | 06:18 PM
  #44  
mono4lamar's Avatar
In the burnout box...
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (32)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,453
Likes: 2
From: New York
A-Rod needs his tune before he gets anymore encouragement to beat on the car... With all that said. This thread has some strange "opinions".
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2007 | 07:35 PM
  #45  
MADDSLOW's Avatar
Thread Starter
17 second FD
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2,436
Likes: 1
From: Poughkeepsie, New York
Originally Posted by mono4lamar
A-Rod needs his tune before he gets anymore encouragement to beat on the car...
Very true... God, it's so tempting sometimes
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2007 | 11:54 AM
  #46  
TitaniumTT's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,970
Likes: 1
From: Connecticut
I had the SR 9.5lber in my FC... wow what a difference....

heh - I seem to remeber a sweltering hot day in July.......
A-Rod - Should I make a pass?
B - It's hot.... humid... I dunno
A-Rod - I want to so bad though...

then we both look to our left as some trailerqueen piston car goes lurching down the track belching fireballs....
Convo quickly went back to heatshields

Ever get on with that SS heat shield?
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2007 | 02:34 PM
  #47  
93FD3S's Avatar
Big Snail
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 3
From: San Antonio
I experienced a significant difference in throttle response between stock and my ACT Prolite. I found my self hitting the rev limiter a couple times when I first drove the car after install. You are talking about removing approximately 9 pounds of weight from the rotational mass. Its amazing the difference it makes.
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2007 | 06:31 PM
  #48  
jdhuegel1's Avatar
Glug Glug Glug Burp
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,819
Likes: 0
From: Scott AFB, IL
I'm going to bump this up for clarification...

When rebuilding my motor and buying tons of parts I was told on SEVERAL occasions that the race clutches were designed for just that. Racing. Dump-Engage. Not calmly pulling away from a stoplight so as not to grab a cops attention... and not riding the **** out of it to start on a hill. My understanding is that they will warp and wear significantly faster if not used appropriately.

I learned to drive the car like this. It's a little hard - simply because I have to smack it in gear... but hey, this is what lots of builders/tuners were saying.

SO... lets just use my car as an example:

ACT Extreme with 6 puck unsprung...

Will Sally driving shorten the life of the clutch?

FWIW it also has the 9lb RB flywheel.
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2007 | 07:24 PM
  #49  
GoodfellaFD3S's Avatar
Original Gangster/Rotary!
Veteran: Army
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (213)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 30,804
Likes: 646
From: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
One other random though-----6 puck clutches tend to chew up flywheels pretty quickly, vs stock organic discs. Lightweight flywheels aren't cheap either......
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2007 | 08:18 AM
  #50  
MADDSLOW's Avatar
Thread Starter
17 second FD
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2,436
Likes: 1
From: Poughkeepsie, New York
What is "pretty quickly"?
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:33 AM.