3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Garfinkles rich man non-seq twins before/after pics

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 6, 2007 | 12:54 AM
  #26  
Narfle's Avatar
Rx7 Wagon
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 6,978
Likes: 888
From: California
I see most guys here running about 11.5 but AHarada is right. I think your setups has a lot more left in it if you want it
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2007 | 06:29 AM
  #27  
SportCoupe2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
From: Savannah
Originally Posted by Barban
I see most guys here running about 11.5 but AHarada is right. I think your setups has a lot more left in it if you want it
Not unless I want to drop more money in it. My injector duty cycle is 86%. That's pretty much maxed for stock injectors for me. Going into the 90's is just too risky.
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2007 | 06:32 AM
  #28  
WaLieN's Avatar
Call me gramps!
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,334
Likes: 0
From: Detroit, MI
Originally Posted by SportCoupe2
I read it as 433 hp at the wheels. A DynaPack is a chassis dyno, not an engine dyno.
It seems you have read incorrectly. It clearly states "Fly Wheel" on there.
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2007 | 07:35 AM
  #29  
GoodfellaFD3S's Avatar
Original Gangster/Rotary!
Veteran: Army
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (213)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 30,807
Likes: 648
From: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Originally Posted by SportCoupe2
Yes, I agree if you are talking piston engines. Rotarys need the extra fuel to live.
If you ever want more reliable power, pick up an Aquamist water injection kit, and you'll be able to run 15 psi with 11.5 AFRs all day long, and arguably a 'safer' setup than you have now from an anti-detonation standpoint. Of course, the longevity of the stock twins will probably be compromised a bit at those levels.
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2007 | 09:51 AM
  #30  
SportCoupe2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
From: Savannah
Originally Posted by WaLieN
It seems you have read incorrectly. It clearly states "Fly Wheel" on there.


Off topic but it clearly says chassis dyno. All DynaPacks are chassis dynos. I did see the flywheel correction you mentioned and it is purely a calculated number based on his 368 wheel hp and a guess on drivetrain losses. Still, great numbers but far from 433whp.
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2007 | 10:29 PM
  #31  
pincusa's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
From: NY
Basic question, and sorry if I don't understand what was done.
With all the cross over welded up in the manifold, and the prespool gate removed, how do you control the boost from the second turbo? The waste gate only controlling the primary. How is the inlet pressure controlled in the secondary turbo?
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2007 | 11:11 PM
  #32  
t-von's Avatar
Rotor Head Extreme
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,719
Likes: 26
From: Midland Texas
Originally Posted by pincusa
Basic question, and sorry if I don't understand what was done.
With all the cross over welded up in the manifold, and the prespool gate removed, how do you control the boost from the second turbo? The waste gate only controlling the primary. How is the inlet pressure controlled in the secondary turbo?


The wastegate is only bleed from the primary turbo. The crossover to the pre-spool opening is eliminated to reduce the turbulence in that area. Since there is now no exhaust flow transition between both turbo's, this conversion basically utilizes the air flow of each individual exhaust runners and flows it to it's own turbo. From what I can see from the pics, there is still some room for improvement on that manifold to decrease lag. Anyone who understands Bernoulli's principle will know exactly what I'm talking about.
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2007 | 10:53 PM
  #33  
GARCO MOTORWORKS's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,179
Likes: 1
From: next to the polishing wheel!!!
Tthe prespool area is blocked to the turbo port ,the crosstube between the two turbos that goes to the wastegate is in the main manifold before the turbos . BOTH turbos are vented by the wastgate . I am not so dumb as to not control both turbos .
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2007 | 12:58 PM
  #34  
Montego's Avatar
Don't worry be happy...
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 6,901
Likes: 842
From: San Diego, CA
good HP numbers. But I must say 12 psi by 3800 is the norm too bad I was hoping that you would get a little better than the rest of us.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Glazedham42
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
6
May 2, 2022 02:41 PM
Glazedham42
1st Gen Archive
2
Sep 1, 2015 08:20 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:34 PM.