3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Fuel line routing with twin pumps

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 14, 2014 | 12:39 AM
  #1  
austinramsay's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 174
Likes: 1
From: Yuma AZ
Fuel line routing with twin pumps

Just put in some full function primary and secondary rails, along with some ID 1000 primaries and ID 2000 secondaries. I was looking at my options for fuel line routing to see if theres anything better I can do than go in series. I was looking at this, but it doesn't really make a lot of sense. I'm going with twin fuel pumps also. I don't see the point in going from a 3/8" line from each pump, into a Y to a 1/2" line. That seems like it'd be a restriction. Can I just run a line off each pump? One line going to my primary rail, one going to my secondary, then to each side of my A1000 aeromotive FPR? And secondary out the bottom? Less restriction, more flow.



How I'm looking at it, with a filter and all necessary fittings and everything of course.

Reply
Old Mar 14, 2014 | 11:05 AM
  #2  
Mitchocalypse's Avatar
Brap..
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 449
Likes: 1
From: Alberta, Canada
Problem with one pump per rail is that the rails don't have the same injectors.

Honestly, if I were you I'd T the pumps and run a 1/2 inch line. Makes way more sense. The funny thing about these cars is that for the majority of builds, one pump is just a little less fuel than would be required so you get another one and now you have way more than you'd probably need. Still need the second pump technically but it's just way more than you actually need and there's no way around it. Except for insane builds obviously but yeah.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2014 | 11:06 AM
  #3  
Mitchocalypse's Avatar
Brap..
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 449
Likes: 1
From: Alberta, Canada
Oh the point with the last bit about the 2 pumps probably being a bit overkill (but still necessary) is that I wouldn't be worried at all by whatever restriction a Y in the line causes.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2014 | 11:47 AM
  #4  
austinramsay's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 174
Likes: 1
From: Yuma AZ
Originally Posted by Mitchocalypse
Problem with one pump per rail is that the rails don't have the same injectors. Honestly, if I were you I'd T the pumps and run a 1/2 inch line. Makes way more sense. The funny thing about these cars is that for the majority of builds, one pump is just a little less fuel than would be required so you get another one and now you have way more than you'd probably need. Still need the second pump technically but it's just way more than you actually need and there's no way around it. Except for insane builds obviously but yeah.
Oh i get you, but why does it matter if the rails have different injectors? But why not make the most out of the 2 pumps if your gonna take the time to put em in? Its just like you could have more if you ever need it later, and youll never have to mess with it anymore. Sorry for all the questions but im just curious haha. I get what you mean about one is almost enough and the second is just that extra little push you need but why not use all of what you have?
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2014 | 12:18 PM
  #5  
Mitchocalypse's Avatar
Brap..
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 449
Likes: 1
From: Alberta, Canada
You can't use all you have. You only use what you're tuned for so I guess it doesn't really matter
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2014 | 12:20 PM
  #6  
Mitchocalypse's Avatar
Brap..
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 449
Likes: 1
From: Alberta, Canada
Sorry I'm posting from my phone, didn't mean to submit this
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2014 | 12:23 PM
  #7  
Mitchocalypse's Avatar
Brap..
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 449
Likes: 1
From: Alberta, Canada
And about the different sized injectors, I guess it doesn't really matter so long as each rail has sufficient fuel supply. But merging the two pumps is just way more common.

Also cheaper.. Line is fairly expensive. Although so are some of the fittings
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2014 | 02:30 PM
  #8  
ondabirdhouse's Avatar
Big Bird's Here!!!
Veteran: Army
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 721
Likes: 2
From: Jacksonville, FL
I have twin walbro pumps intank using the CJ hanger. The problem with one pump per rail is that if one pump FAILS then you just lost fuel for the entire rail which could be catastrophic. So...I have a Y connection about a foot after the fuel tank which leads to a good aftermarket filter; I'm running -8 AN Hose after the Y. Then at the engine bay I put another Y but with -6 AN to each rail and then each rail to the Fuel regulator.
Attached Thumbnails Fuel line routing with twin pumps-fuelrouting_zpsf6a7650c.png  
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2014 | 03:29 PM
  #9  
Mitchocalypse's Avatar
Brap..
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 449
Likes: 1
From: Alberta, Canada
Originally Posted by ondabirdhouse
I have twin walbro pumps intank using the CJ hanger. The problem with one pump per rail is that if one pump FAILS then you just lost fuel for the entire rail which could be catastrophic. So...I have a Y connection about a foot after the fuel tank which leads to a good aftermarket filter; I'm running -8 AN Hose after the Y. Then at the engine bay I put another Y but with -6 AN to each rail and then each rail to the Fuel regulator.
Same for me except I have a different pump setup. But that's the best way I think is one line, splitting into 2 at the rails
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2014 | 06:20 PM
  #10  
IRPerformance's Avatar
Sponsor
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 11,347
Likes: 321
From: NJ
I prefer to run the rails in parallel with one pump per rail. Get an AEM failsafe wideband and set it up to cut boost is the afrs go lean.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
trickster
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
25
Jul 1, 2023 04:40 PM
BLK 93
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
4
Aug 19, 2015 03:47 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:19 AM.