3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

FD 'V' EVO 8 handling

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 22, 2006 | 10:30 PM
  #26  
d1rx7's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
From: new zealand
Originally Posted by BlkS5TII
2 completely different animals. Although they are AWD the Evos computers control the center diff to not allow understeer, but any jackass can drive it horribly enough to induce it. The stock suspension on them is very stiff as well. I've never driven an FD, but don't mock the Evo until you drive one. I thought I would notice the extra weight on it, but it is one awesome machine.

BTW, there's also a difference between the Evos that have the Active Center Differential and those that don't. They are both good, but the ACD makes a good difference in adverse weather conditions.

Don't take one vid and follow it as the gospel. Just because the drivers of the AWD cars lost control or whatever doesn't mean that that's what will always happen. I'll take my Evo out in the rain over my FC ANY day. I'll also race any one of you in a good downpour.
im not mocking the evo, i just thought i would show that vid as they are all stock, i dont like evos or any awd car, i just love my 2 fds, got a mate who has a wrx and he was just takeing off out of the corners and i couldnt do nothing, till i was out of the conner, i wasnt pushing my car to the extrem as im still geting use to it, so yea i know that awd cars handle well, but still think a fd will out handle a evo on a track
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2006 | 10:56 PM
  #27  
BlkS5TII's Avatar
JDM > USDM
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 515
Likes: 0
From: Tokyo
Originally Posted by d1rx7
...i dont like evos or any awd car... but still think a fd will out handle a evo on a track
Thank you for your unbiased opinion. I'd like to hear from people that have actually driven/owned both. I'm looking to buy an FD in the very near future, so maybe I'll let you all know then.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2006 | 11:37 PM
  #28  
Mazda_Power's Avatar
I just want to drive it.
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
From: Duluth, MN
Originally Posted by weetbix13
i'm intending to go test drive an Evo7 at some stage shortly...
Oddly enough, I've driven an EVO 8, but never an FD so I don't really have an opinion. I can say that the Evo handles so well it would be very difficult to out do.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2006 | 11:40 PM
  #29  
KeloidJonesJr.'s Avatar
strictly business
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 6,187
Likes: 0
From: chamber of farts
Originally Posted by ulost2my7
That question is so vague.

You are comparing 2 totally different cars first off. And 2 different time frames with 2 different technologies.

Even so, id say even so an FD will out do an evo on the course.
Wow, so well said. Though RWD is good at putting power down to the ground (pushing) but AWD is superior when it comes to that. Hope that helpS?
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2006 | 01:32 AM
  #30  
John Magnuson's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,147
Likes: 1
From: San Diego, CA
From my experience at various west coast road course race tracks a well set up EVO or STi will equal a stock or mildly modified FD in lap times. Of course this is given that the drivers are of equal skill.

My mildly modified FD has beaten semi-professionally driven stock STi and EVO cars at various time trials even in traction impaired conditions. (by narrow margins)

However, give the STi or EVO a few choice modifications and we're essentially equal. Since my FD is a bit modified I'd have to say that an FD and STi or EVO are essentially equally matched for lap times.

However, the FD is much more fun to drive. In my opinion (and the admitted opinion of many an EVO or STi owner) oversteer is much more fun than constant understeer. True, the FD can be a bit more challenging to get around a track in a fast manner - but that's part of the fun, right?

I have the greatest respect for the engineering and performance of the STi and EVO. Given that they are sedans their performance is most impressive. However, I have more fun in my FD and I'm glad I have it as my track car. What is an amateur track day about if not fun?
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2006 | 04:04 AM
  #31  
azn akira's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
From: Seoul, Korea
i've driven a stock evo and a ~400whp evo with r compounds, i also own an fd. the evo does handle very well. its corner entry and cornering speed is almost as high as the fds. it has a lot of traction out of corners so you can go full throttle sooner and make make up for any cornering speed difference. however imo awd is less fun to drive than rwd. the evo does not give the same experience as the fd. if i had to choose between the evo and the fd to take to the track, id choose the fd everytime rain or shine.

Last edited by azn akira; Apr 23, 2006 at 04:19 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2006 | 11:45 AM
  #32  
TurboTagTeam's Avatar
Broken FD
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 457
Likes: 0
From: Philadelphia
I'v driven an evo8 with coilovers and azenis. They are very easy cars to drive fast. You can late brake like a mother ****** and the car is still flat and controllable through the corners. However, my fd is most definatly faster. You can throw it into the corners more. And it just takes off on the strights. Granted, a fd is a harder car to drive fast IMHO.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2006 | 02:15 PM
  #33  
1QWIK7's Avatar
White chicks > *
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,146
Likes: 1
From: Secaucus, New Jersey
Originally Posted by TurboTagTeam
I'v driven an evo8 with coilovers and azenis. They are very easy cars to drive fast. You can late brake like a mother ****** and the car is still flat and controllable through the corners. However, my fd is most definatly faster. You can throw it into the corners more. And it just takes off on the strights. Granted, a fd is a harder car to drive fast IMHO.

Yeah, not only that. With todays technology, alot of cars use electronics to compensate for lack of good driving skills or people who have plain out poor driving skills. So basically any normal joe can get in an evo and run pretty good times with basically no track experience. The FD is a true man's sports car. It has raw feel with no aid by electronics to assist in any moment to where it might be difficult for the driver to overcome. You really need to know the car, track and yourself to be able to be somewhat good on the track in the FD.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2006 | 02:26 PM
  #34  
ehos's Avatar
Passion
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 457
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton
Handling IS relative. The FD is a great handling car, better than the EVO/STI on a nice dry pavement.

Make it snow, or really wet, and I wouldn't want to be in the FD at all. Especially when it's colder condensation (forget about ice). The EVO/STi is actually fun to drive in the snow! (Still need good tires of course).

jp
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2006 | 02:33 PM
  #35  
rt turbo's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 693
Likes: 0
From: charlotte, nc
Originally Posted by ulost2my7
That question is so vague.

You are comparing 2 totally different cars first off. And 2 different time frames with 2 different technologies.

Even so, id say even so an FD will out do an evo on the course.
umm, i own both. the fd is great handling, but the evo just has more grip.. plain and simple. ive autocrossed both cars, and my evo times are much better. its just an easier car to drive fast. being honest and bypardesin (sp?) the evo holds the road better.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2006 | 02:48 PM
  #36  
1QWIK7's Avatar
White chicks > *
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,146
Likes: 1
From: Secaucus, New Jersey
Originally Posted by rt turbo
umm, i own both. the fd is great handling, but the evo just has more grip.. plain and simple. ive autocrossed both cars, and my evo times are much better. its just an easier car to drive fast. being honest and bypardesin (sp?) the evo holds the road better.

Of course evo will have more grip, its awd. ANd i wasnt talking about autocross, im talking about a road course.

Its already been proven on video that an FD can outdo an evo on the course and both cars were driven by some of the best drivers in japan.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2006 | 02:49 PM
  #37  
John Magnuson's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,147
Likes: 1
From: San Diego, CA
Originally Posted by rt turbo
ive autocrossed both cars, and my evo times are much better. its just an easier car to drive fast.
Yes, on a tight course like an autocross the awd system on the EVO provides a big advantage.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2006 | 07:43 PM
  #38  
Dezigns's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
From: Tauranga, NZ
Originally Posted by BlkS5TII
I'll take my Evo out in the rain over my FC ANY day. I'll also race any one of you in a good downpour.
There's no way I'd even attempt to race an Evo with my FD in the wet... you're just asking for trouble! I have enough trouble putting the power down in a straight line let alone corners

Certainly leave my buddies Evo7 for dead around the track - although im not sure if that is just his driving ability and me severely outpowering him

Last edited by Dezigns; Apr 23, 2006 at 07:46 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2006 | 07:54 PM
  #39  
RuffRyder's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
From: california,usa
Who are you guys kidding. I've driven both and i say by far FD is much mroe fun to drive its by far the best car i've ever been in. Thats why I own my FD and am so proud of it. But in course situations Evo will own the FD. EVo's are insane on tracks..check out this video of stock EVo owning a lambo. Stock evo! http://videos.streetfire.net/hottest...997DC125EC.htm
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2006 | 08:03 PM
  #40  
RuffRyder's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
From: california,usa
Actually, I think its a beefed up version of an EVO. But i'm sure FD with a few mods liek Intake and straight exhaust would prob still not be able to drive like it.
Also this show is kind of anti-lambo, i would take that lambo over evo any day but you get the point.

Last edited by RuffRyder; Apr 23, 2006 at 08:06 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2006 | 08:06 PM
  #41  
BlkS5TII's Avatar
JDM > USDM
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 515
Likes: 0
From: Tokyo
Originally Posted by ulost2my7
Its already been proven on video that an FD can outdo an evo on the course and both cars were driven by some of the best drivers in japan.
Lol. If you want to go off of one race to completely judge both cars then look at the results of Super Streets latest time trials. The Cobalt owned both cars! lol.

Not every good driver can drive good 100% of the time. You can't just take one race and call it the final word.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2006 | 08:16 PM
  #42  
1QWIK7's Avatar
White chicks > *
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,146
Likes: 1
From: Secaucus, New Jersey
Originally Posted by BlkS5TII
Lol. If you want to go off of one race to completely judge both cars then look at the results of Super Streets latest time trials. The Cobalt owned both cars! lol.

Not every good driver can drive good 100% of the time. You can't just take one race and call it the final word.

So tell me how would you judge it then? Like best out of 100 races?

Go watch a couple of best motoring videos. I know i sound like a ricer when i say that but those guys are pure professionals at its best. It shows an FD beating an evo on the track stock for stock. It shows a mildly modded FD beating a mildly modded evo. But it lose by .5 of a second in one race because FD was on wet tires and the evo wasnt.

How many more races do you need to watch?

And about the cobalt, are you talking about the one that was stripped to like zero lbs and was race prepped?? If so, LOL @ that. Im talking about stock vs stock mainly. Its all relative when the cars are modded but base is what we're looking at since its the standpoint for performance obviously.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2006 | 08:18 PM
  #43  
d1rx7's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
From: new zealand
thats no normal evo you but 400hp in a fd and it will be the same, and that thing cost **** loads, so you spend your extra money you saved on handling mods and the fd will still out handle the evo. i mite be wrong here but thats a 400fq, they only made a limited number of them didnt they? if you but a stock evo8 and fd against each other the fd will win. and thats in the usa were the fd was only avalible till 95, over here i in new zealand if we put the 98+modles up against it they would do even better.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
REX7&Z32TT
New Member RX-7 Technical
2
Sep 14, 2015 08:46 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:24 PM.