3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

FD or FC more reliable? questions about ownership

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-22-02, 12:24 AM
  #1  
Junior Member

Thread Starter
 
Zerostealth's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: texas
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FD or FC more reliable? questions about ownership

i have been told that the FD is the most unreliable car built in the past 15 years. compared to my celica, thats probably awful, however im still interested.

i can't explain what draws me to the car. do most of you keep a spare motor on hand? when a motor goes, what must be replaced?

also which is more reliable, the FC or the FD model?

what does the motor do when it dies? and are there pre-death signs so you can avoid having it just up and die on you and fix it before this occurs
Old 05-22-02, 12:28 AM
  #2  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
Nameless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 1,087
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is a newbie sticky post that the moderators so graciously put up for these types of things. Please use it.
Old 05-22-02, 12:33 AM
  #3  
Lurking..................

 
black99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: PA
Posts: 2,220
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: FD or FC more reliable? questions about ownership

Originally posted by Zerostealth


i can't explain what draws me to the car. do most of you keep a spare motor on hand?

Yes I have a tractor trailer follow me around with a full engine building team, 5 pit crew guys, spare tires and body panels all inside...



No, nobody I know of keeps a spare motor on hand. Do what Nameless said to do..
Old 05-22-02, 01:00 AM
  #4  
reliable performance

 
JConn2299's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: MA, USA
Posts: 383
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The 3rd Generation RX-7's reputation for unreliability is exaggerated. There are a number of cars that have gone over 100,000 miles on their original engines.

The trouble comes from improperly modified or inadequately maintained cars, and the problem only gets worse as the cars get cheaper. People who really can't afford to maintain the cars are now buying them.

The car gets a lot of power out of a small engine, but it's set up to operate within a narrow envelope. If you start monkeying with things, say putting too much air through the engine without also increasing the fuel flow, you can get detonation that will ruin the motor.

The most common causes of engine failure seem to be leaking coolant seals, detonation, and broken apex seals. Usually there is little or no warning of impending doom, although often coolant seals will begin to leak gradually and the car can still be driven until finally it cannot be started.

It's a real sportscar with very few compromises, which is probably one of the reasons why you're attracted to it.

Last edited by JConn2299; 05-22-02 at 01:08 AM.
Old 05-22-02, 03:47 AM
  #5  
thats not paint....

 
7-sins's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Manassas, VA
Posts: 2,231
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
I always heard the FC N/A motors run like champs. JConn sums the FD up.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
_Tones_
Adaptronic Engine Mgmt - AUS
10
05-25-21 05:37 AM
t-von
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
9
09-10-15 01:56 PM
mulcryant
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
10
09-09-15 05:24 PM
Nosferatu
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
7
09-05-15 02:13 PM



Quick Reply: FD or FC more reliable? questions about ownership



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:59 AM.