3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

FD best "supercar" value on the planet?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-08-09, 08:33 PM
  #26  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
xzl6b1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: se michigan
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My dream "sports cars/ supercars" are a Porsche GT3, or ZR1 (this week anyway).

Just making a point, a modded FD can give some impressive aka "expensive" 2005-2007 "sportscars/supercars" a good run.

Yes, "sports cars" is a better term. I looked at the top lb/hp model for each manufacturer in the database. That was my definition of a "supercar".
Old 04-08-09, 09:51 PM
  #27  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (83)
 
Supernaut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Los Angeles CA
Posts: 5,859
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Im lucky, my dream car is my FD. Its how I can justify spending all that money on it during these awful times. Imagine how most people would feel with a carrera GT, thats how I feel about my FD. Supercar or not, its still my #1!
Old 04-08-09, 11:21 PM
  #28  
dorito powered

iTrader: (5)
 
KKMpunkrock2011's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Lincoln, NE
Posts: 2,839
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I love my FD, don't get me wrong, but it isn't on the same level as some of the true super cars. can it hurt some supercar butts? you bet, but when you park it at night, you're still driving what was once a 35k mazda, while the guy driving the ferrari, still has, a ferrari
Old 04-09-09, 12:41 AM
  #29  
Rotary Enthusiast

iTrader: (8)
 
dguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: sb
Posts: 1,471
Received 210 Likes on 158 Posts
A supercar excells in every department save cargo capacity :P. The FD is a great mass production chassis and a stellar power plant with a chinsy interior. They're great cars, have a better bang for the buck than most anything out there but a supercar they are not.
Old 04-09-09, 05:52 AM
  #30  
Senior Member

iTrader: (1)
 
gio64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 655
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Does it matter?

I believe that a "supercar" is a car that excels in the sophistication of the "go" part of the engineering. So, suspension, tranny, engine, and chassis are designed and built with more expensive and rare materials as well as engineered to be on the leading edge of performance. I wouldn't put a car in that list just because it goes fast. Like somebody said, a modified car can achieve those numbers and some tuners have accomplished such a status in the car market that their products (Ruf, for instance) can easily be considered in that area. So, I would not put a car in that list, for instance, if its power plant doesn't have outstanding hp/l numbers as there would be nothing super about that.
In other words, I feel that super refers to a combination of absolute numbers together with how extraordinary is the engineering feat necessary to accomplish those numbers.

If you take the engineering feat out, all you have is a tuner car made "in house" by a big manufacturer. Don't forget, every car can go that fast, the question is how you get there (it's about the journey, not the destination).

Our beloved FD3S "kind of" get into that realm in my opinion. Certainly they don't any longer, but if you look at it in the context it was introduced in, I think it will appear under a different light. A bit back I was reading one of those "high performance car shootout" in a magazine and I was stunned by the fact that the lateral acceleration they were able to generate under cornering wasn't better than the one the RX7 can generate dead stock.
Just enjoy your car, look how unique and beautiful it is....
Old 04-09-09, 06:23 AM
  #31  
GTR

iTrader: (5)
 
AmviciousRav's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The 916
Posts: 1,159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I thought a Z06 was the cheapest super car? (well super car killer )
Old 04-09-09, 07:24 AM
  #32  
Rotary Freak

iTrader: (22)
 
Rx7aholic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Morris Plains, NJ USA
Posts: 1,922
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Well my definitons Sportscar= Rotary Power & Sound period, only reason why I brought my car.
Khris
Old 04-09-09, 02:10 PM
  #33  
Senior Member

 
habu2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 731
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don't worry, your insurance company will let you know if you're driving a true "supercar"...
Old 04-09-09, 02:51 PM
  #34  
¯\(°_o)/¯

 
◡ KUZU◕7◕'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Rear Housing
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts


suuuuuuuuuupa car
Old 04-09-09, 02:55 PM
  #35  
QM



iTrader: (9)
 
Sarusanj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Chandler, AZ
Posts: 485
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You must mean the one on the left, because the white one is an RX7. lol
Old 04-09-09, 04:13 PM
  #36  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (9)
 
ptrhahn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 9,027
Received 500 Likes on 274 Posts
"Supercar" isn't about prestigious brands or luxury appointments, it is a performance benchmark, that to some extent takes into account the compromises needed to achieve it, since we're talking about street cars.

It's sort of like "State of the art". What it was yesterday isn't what it is today.
Old 04-09-09, 04:25 PM
  #37  
CYD
Senior Member

 
CYD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Oregon
Posts: 364
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
If they (Mazda) would produce the Furai, I would see that fitting into the SuperCar category. Not so much the FD or typically modded FD for that matter. Now if you take the FD to a tuner shop, ala RE Amemiya, Pettit, Scoot and get something insane from that, including improvements/upgraes to all areas performance/aero/interior, then I could see the modified/Tuner FD being a SuperCar, in the same sense I would look at a Hennesey, Veilside, TechArt, Gembala, Scoot one-off as a supercar.

~CYD
Old 04-09-09, 09:40 PM
  #38  
It's finally reliable

iTrader: (18)
 
MOBEONER's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: NEW YORK CITY
Posts: 3,512
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
The FD is a "super car" because mobeoner said so.
Old 04-10-09, 12:02 AM
  #39  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
MisterX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Another state obliterated by leftists
Posts: 208
Received 538 Likes on 270 Posts
Originally Posted by ptrhahn
"Supercar" isn't about prestigious brands or luxury appointments, it is a performance benchmark, that to some extent takes into account the compromises needed to achieve it, since we're talking about street cars.

It's sort of like "State of the art". What it was yesterday isn't what it is today.
I definitely agree with your points, and would expound on them by adding that exotic materials - in addition to the powertrain technology - for the car's production time are a must. Examples : 959, F50, McLaren, Enzo.

To me, all supercars are exotic, but not all exotics are supercars.

For its time the RX-7 could definitely be called the best performer for anywhere near its price. But, supercar? No.
Old 04-10-09, 08:20 AM
  #40  
red89fc

iTrader: (3)
 
Red95FD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Cincinnati Ohio
Posts: 1,149
Received 28 Likes on 22 Posts
The FD may not be in the supercar ranks. But it is a super car.
Old 04-10-09, 09:22 AM
  #41  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (9)
 
ptrhahn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 9,027
Received 500 Likes on 274 Posts
Upon further review, no, the FD as built OE or as typically modified is not a supercar.

In 1993, what you got was near-supercar performance at a non-supercar price. What was great about the FD that was uncommon of other cars of that ilk from that time period (the 3000GTs, Corvettes, and 300Zs and such) was the stuff that you can't change with bolt ons, that were typical of more expensive/exotic machinery—the attention to weight and stiffness of the chassis, the suspension engineering, aero, ballance—the platform. That meant with bolt-ons, you did have supercar performance for the time—I believe that was the inference in the original "Peter Farrell Supercars" name. It was true.

Today, that bar has been moved quite a bit, and it would take a significantly upgraded car to reach that level, but the most amazing thing about the FD is that the platform engineering really still allows it, more so than virtually any of it's competitors of the day.

Such a car would have be on the order of David Hayes or Gordon's car in execution, PLUS.

It would dictate an upgrade to Mov'iT carbon/ceramic brakes, a top of the line JRZ or similar suspension. Some carbon bodywork, and perhaps structural pieces (like a Carbon PPF), and likely some aero underbody work. Today's supercars are zero lift or downforce producing (think Ferrari Enzo, or McLaren F1).

The fact that all of that's true if you were so inclined though, adds up to a great value some 16 years on.

Last edited by ptrhahn; 04-10-09 at 09:36 AM.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:02 PM.