3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Fastest 1/4 ET's w/ stock turbos????

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 17, 2002 | 02:01 AM
  #26  
LUV94RX7's Avatar
Oldie, but Goodie
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,778
Likes: 1
From: ROSEVILLE, MN
11.90 - 12.80, SO MANY VARIABLES AT THE LAUNCH.

drag slicks, burnouts, dump clutch at 6krpms, road surface, driving skills, etc etc maybe 11.90.

Street tires, no burn out, 3k launch, good driving skills maybe 12.80.

Ken
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2002 | 07:18 AM
  #27  
ErnieT's Avatar
Living life 9 seconds at a time
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 6,541
Likes: 0
From: Abingdon, Md
Originally posted by efiniracing
What would you guys say that my best time will be w/ a trap speed of 116mph? So far I still can't into the 11's.
I ran 11.8@116mph....with a 1.75 60'.....
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2002 | 07:54 AM
  #28  
Wade's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
From: Charleston, WV
Jim,

I'm just giving you a hard time. I would never expect him to do as well in that event as his "all time best" run. I'm still a little surprised he didn't do better than he did though (111 mph!). May have been really hot and he didn't have time to ice down or something.

Wade
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2002 | 08:16 AM
  #29  
pp13bnos's Avatar
Pineapple Racer
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 2,698
Likes: 7
From: Oregon
Ken, your just about right on. I just ran a 12.8@107 on street tires, letting the clutch fly at 3.5k. I then turned up the boost a bit, and ran a 12.9@114mph CJ
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2002 | 08:36 AM
  #30  
laujesse's Avatar
Thrashing your Roy score!
Veteran: Air Force
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,581
Likes: 73
From: Japan
I saw a option vid a few weeks ago of a 100% BONE STOCK Model Year 2001 RS FD3S run a 12.9... dont remember the speed though. If anyone cares.

Crazy thing is last time I took apart a 2000 RS, the down pipe is actully smaller(about 1 cm) than the 93's. Everybody thinks its the intake all the small improvements but it is all the turbos. It is actully more resticted than the 93's.

Last edited by laujesse; Jun 17, 2002 at 08:41 AM.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2002 | 11:01 AM
  #31  
mmaragos's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 597
Likes: 1
From: Windsor, CA
Originally posted by laujesse2
I saw a option vid a few weeks ago of a 100% BONE STOCK Model Year 2001 RS FD3S run a 12.9... dont remember the speed though. If anyone cares.

Crazy thing is last time I took apart a 2000 RS, the down pipe is actully smaller(about 1 cm) than the 93's. Everybody thinks its the intake all the small improvements but it is all the turbos. It is actully more resticted than the 93's.
How did they run a 12.9? There is not that much more power there, is there? Which Options vid is that?

I thought that the main difference would be that the '93 ran a precat, while they removed that on the newer models. Pipe diameter may be less, but overall the newer models are less restrictive (because there is no precat).
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2002 | 02:51 PM
  #32  
efiniracing's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
From: Norcross,Ga,USA
Originally posted by ErnieT

I ran 11.8@116mph....with a 1.75 60'.....
I'm using Toyo Proxe drag radials, and launching @6k and I still can't get my 60'ft below 1.9s. Maybe I'm not burning out long enough?
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2002 | 04:54 PM
  #33  
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
From: Plano, Tx
A friend of mine ran 11.4 at 11psi in San Antonio. He now has a T78, but then, he had stock twins. He made the run with a street port, an apex FMIC, a Power FC, full exhaust, and a Bonez Street/Strip. The car was tuned by Rotary Performance/RX7.com.
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2002 | 04:59 PM
  #34  
ErnieT's Avatar
Living life 9 seconds at a time
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 6,541
Likes: 0
From: Abingdon, Md
Originally posted by CYMRXeven
A friend of mine ran 11.4 at 11psi in San Antonio. He now has a T78, but then, he had stock twins. He made the run with a street port, an apex FMIC, a Power FC, full exhaust, and a Bonez Street/Strip. The car was tuned by Rotary Performance/RX7.com.
11psi on what???? Stock twins? If so your full of ****!...Even 11psi on the T78 he'll only run a low 12, high 11, so your still full of ****.
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2002 | 05:00 PM
  #35  
ErnieT's Avatar
Living life 9 seconds at a time
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 6,541
Likes: 0
From: Abingdon, Md
Originally posted by efiniracing


I'm using Toyo Proxe drag radials, and launching @6k and I still can't get my 60'ft below 1.9s. Maybe I'm not burning out long enough?
I never used those so I can't help ya. I only have used the Nitto's which are junk and the BFG drag radials which are fantastic....
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2002 | 07:00 PM
  #36  
93 R1's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,734
Likes: 0
From: maryland
ErnieT:
What size BFG's did you run on and what RPM did you launch at?
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2002 | 07:53 PM
  #37  
SPOautos's Avatar
Hey, where did my $$$ go?
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,413
Likes: 0
From: Bimingham, AL
Originally posted by ErnieT

I never used those so I can't help ya. I only have used the Nitto's which are junk and the BFG drag radials which are fantastic....

Why dont you like Nitto's??? You have to burn them out alot more but I thought they were ok. I turn 1.8x's with Nittos and they last 5x longer than BFG's. They also look better on the car if your driving around on the weekend with them. They both have thier pro's and con's but with a good burn out the Nittos are decent.

BTW - A good burn out to me is when you can see smoke at your window. A lot of people just dont burn them long enough

STEPHEN
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2002 | 08:34 PM
  #38  
ErnieT's Avatar
Living life 9 seconds at a time
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 6,541
Likes: 0
From: Abingdon, Md
Originally posted by SPOautos



Why dont you like Nitto's??? You have to burn them out alot more but I thought they were ok. I turn 1.8x's with Nittos and they last 5x longer than BFG's. They also look better on the car if your driving around on the weekend with them. They both have thier pro's and con's but with a good burn out the Nittos are decent.

BTW - A good burn out to me is when you can see smoke at your window. A lot of people just dont burn them long enough

STEPHEN
Your right, they do last longer, but I wasn't worried about that cause I only drove weekends. I cut high 1.8's with Nittos, but I cut mid 1.6's with the BFG's......Big difference. For every tenth you cut off your 60', its good for two tenth's off your 1/4 mile time. I used 275/40/17's for the BFG's and launched at 5800 easing off the clutch, not slipping it.
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2002 | 09:52 PM
  #39  
RX794's Avatar
NYC's Loudest FD
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,539
Likes: 1
From: Long Island, NY
Quickest and fastest twin turboed car I've seen is my friend AnthonyNYC, his car went 11.2's-11.1's@121mph's, pretty consistantly on stock twins, with slicks, pretty simple and effective setup with no blowup problems and was daily driven, BTW this was done with a Pettit Unlimited chip and some other mods.
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2002 | 09:55 PM
  #40  
ErnieT's Avatar
Living life 9 seconds at a time
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 6,541
Likes: 0
From: Abingdon, Md
Originally posted by RX794
Quickest and fastest twin turboed car I've seen is my friend AnthonyNYC, his car went 11.2's-11.1's@121mph's, pretty consistantly on stock twins, with slicks, pretty simple and effective setup with no blowup problems and was daily driven, BTW this was done with a Pettit Unlimited chip and some other mods.
Correct me if Im wrong, but I thought Anthony said he only ran that time once and after he pushed that much boost his turbo's started to puke.....
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2002 | 10:25 PM
  #41  
SPEED_NYC's Avatar
RX-Parts
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,368
Likes: 1
From: Queens, NY
Originally posted by ErnieT

Correct me if Im wrong, but I thought Anthony said he only ran that time once and after he pushed that much boost his turbo's started to puke.....
he ran the 11.1 once, but the car ran 11.2's regularly. as far as the turbos puking, those turbos were bone stock with 98K hard miles on them. they were pretty much **** even before he ran the 11.1

Last edited by SPEED_NYC; Jun 18, 2002 at 10:28 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2002 | 04:51 PM
  #42  
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
From: Plano, Tx
Originally posted by ErnieT

11psi on what???? Stock twins? If so your full of ****!...Even 11psi on the T78 he'll only run a low 12, high 11, so your still full of ****.
Ask Rotary Performance. Chris Ott was there. J. R. could only run 11 psi because he had dying turbos. The guys at Rotary couldn't believe it either.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2002 | 01:56 PM
  #43  
Ehughes's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Yeah this guy, JR, ran at the World import Challenge in Baytown, TX about 3 months ago. I think he ran an 11.4 or 11.5 on stock twins. I don't know what boost he was pushing. Some other guy from San Antonio ran an 11.7 on street tires...and he drove his car from San Antonio (single turbo, though).

Then there was me... Eliminated in the 1st round! I only had my car 30 days. I ran a 12.75 on street tires, stock twins, rebuilt motor, PFC, MP, CB, stock cat, stock inj./fuel pump and PFS IC. I did it for the experience.

JR was fast as hell! Although he did get inched out at the end of his run in the Semi's by one fast *** Supra. Supra got beat by RX7.com in the final.

Last edited by Ehughes; Jun 23, 2002 at 02:01 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2002 | 05:24 PM
  #44  
WhiteRXseven's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 705
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
= *****(

You guys running 11's and 12's with bolt on's
with stock turbos and engine.. Making ME Jealous..
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2002 | 10:09 PM
  #45  
fd3virgin's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,447
Likes: 0
From: abingdon, maryland
sorry this has nothing to do with the post just wanted to ask you since you live in maryland where i can go to have my fd fixed. just got the car.....things are going wrong...... a/c don't work now......the car started leaking coolant yesterday.....so far will go to mazda (russell mazda in catonsville) haven't had any recall work done on it.... and if i am not wrong on of them was for the cooling system??????? and one for the brakes?????? not sure..... please recommend a good place thank you kevin
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2002 | 10:25 PM
  #46  
laujesse's Avatar
Thrashing your Roy score!
Veteran: Air Force
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,581
Likes: 73
From: Japan
Originally posted by mmaragos


How did they run a 12.9? There is not that much more power there, is there? Which Options vid is that?

I thought that the main difference would be that the '93 ran a precat, while they removed that on the newer models. Pipe diameter may be less, but overall the newer models are less restrictive (because there is no precat).
They have more power than they say they do that is the frickin point... There is a 280 ps limit on production cars over here in Japan.

As for the rest of it... no precat stuff is nonsence who ever told you that. Some early model FD's have no precat over here and they are just as slow as yours in the states.

Last edited by laujesse; Jun 23, 2002 at 10:36 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2002 | 10:44 AM
  #47  
Wade's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
From: Charleston, WV
Aren't there a bunch of 1000' (or something else slightly shorter) dragstrips in Japan? Maybe there is no truth to this but I seem to remember someone mentioning that before. That might explain a 12.9 stock.

Wade
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2002 | 12:26 PM
  #48  
matty's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,014
Likes: 40
From: CT
how are you guys doing these burnouts?..i will be gettin drag radilas soon and i guess it will be best if i warm them up.
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2002 | 12:49 PM
  #49  
efiniracing's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
From: Norcross,Ga,USA
Everybody has their own way but what I do is rev to about 7k and just let her rip. I try to get enough of a momentum so I can shift into 2nd and maintain the burnout. I've tried the braking method but I can't seem to get it right.
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2002 | 12:05 AM
  #50  
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
From: Plano, Tx
Originally posted by Ehughes
Yeah this guy, JR, ran at the World import Challenge in Baytown, TX about 3 months ago. I think he ran an 11.4 or 11.5 on stock twins. I don't know what boost he was pushing. Some other guy from San Antonio ran an 11.7 on street tires...and he drove his car from San Antonio (single turbo, though).

JR was fast as hell! Although he did get inched out at the end of his run in the Semi's by one fast *** Supra. Supra got beat by RX7.com in the final.
Thanks for backing me up. I've been racing with JR since he was running high 8's in the 1/8 at our local dragstrip. He's an amazing driver and a good guy. Almost beat him once, but inched me out by .1 second. Now, he destroys me. Anyway, he had really old, ragged-on turbos that's the reason for the low boost.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
trickster
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
25
Jul 1, 2023 04:40 PM
joel(PA)
Rotary Drag Racing
1
Aug 18, 2015 05:56 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:08 AM.