3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

engine swap

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-08-03, 11:42 PM
  #1  
Spending too much $$$

Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
red_ricer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: wisconsin
Posts: 626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question engine swap

hi....i want to do an engine swap in my second gen for a third gen engine but heres the story. i can get the engine for pretty cheap but i am not sure about 1 thing. how efficient would the twin turbos and engine run if there are no vaccum hoses at all? i would just put the eccentials under the hood to make it run.
Old 11-09-03, 05:07 AM
  #2  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
speeddemon7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: colorado
Posts: 1,400
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hmm.Well the twin turbos need all 60 plus vacuum lines to function.So it wouldnt be a good swap unless you also went with a single turbo upgrade.In which case you would have maybe 5 or 6 vacuum lines.Hope this helps.A new turbo will run you about 3000 grand.
Old 11-09-03, 07:24 AM
  #3  
Mr. Links

iTrader: (1)
 
Mahjik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 27,595
Received 40 Likes on 26 Posts
Re: engine swap

Originally posted by red_ricer
hi....i want to do an engine swap in my second gen for a third gen engine but heres the story. i can get the engine for pretty cheap but i am not sure about 1 thing. how efficient would the twin turbos and engine run if there are no vaccum hoses at all? i would just put the eccentials under the hood to make it run.
You can run the turbos in non-sequential mode. It's debatable if that is "more efficient" or not. It'll be basically like running a single turbo, so you'll lose the benefit of the quicker boost of the sequential system. However, you'll have less vacuum lines to deal with, so it just depends on what you want for the car.

With the stock sequential system, most people see full boost around 2500 rpms verses around 4000 rpms of the non-seq.
Old 11-09-03, 08:11 AM
  #4  
Full Member

 
elnr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Plus its easier to trobuleshoot if you have turbo issues.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
trickster
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
25
07-01-23 04:40 PM
Azevedo
Other Engine Conversions - non V-8
26
03-01-19 09:19 PM
maikelc
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
8
08-24-15 11:04 AM
elfking
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
3
08-19-15 09:48 PM
Professorpeanutrx7
New Member RX-7 Technical
5
08-15-15 01:38 PM



Quick Reply: engine swap



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:38 AM.