3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

edge engine oil

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 8, 2006 | 07:10 AM
  #1  
bigbobballsacks's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: wales
edge engine oil

is castrol edge 0w-40 engine oil ok for my 94 single turbo rx7?
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2006 | 10:54 AM
  #2  
IRPerformance's Avatar
Sponsor
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 11,347
Likes: 321
From: NJ
Too thin in my opinion.
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2010 | 07:42 PM
  #3  
cewrx7r1's Avatar
Eye In The Sky
Tenured Member: 25 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 7,941
Likes: 133
From: In A Disfunctional World
0w-40 mean 0 for very cold cranking but 40 when hot.
It is not thin except at cold temperatures.
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2010 | 10:04 PM
  #4  
zack4173's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,020
Likes: 0
From: Bonney lake Washington
as far as I know 0w40 is meant for European cars.
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2010 | 07:38 AM
  #5  
1QWIK7's Avatar
White chicks > *
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,147
Likes: 1
From: Secaucus, New Jersey
Originally Posted by zack4173
as far as I know 0w40 is meant for European cars.
This.

I know honda race cars swear by this now.

Honda track cars in japan i mean. ENEOS 0w-20. And all that other crazy stuff.
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2010 | 12:22 PM
  #6  
bajaman's Avatar
Constant threat
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,968
Likes: 39
From: near Wichita, Kansas
Originally Posted by Rotary Experiment Seven
Too thin in my opinion.
I would listen to this man.

The modern zero, ten, and twenty weight engine oils are designed with the extremely close tolerances modern engines have. There was an article in Car&Driver/Road and Track/MotorTrend that discussed this a while back. And while there were some exceptions, the basic premise was indeed, "These oils are too thin to use in engines not specifically designed for them".
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2010 | 01:41 PM
  #7  
wstrohm's Avatar
Recovering Miataholic
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,559
Likes: 50
From: Fountain Valley, CA
Mazda recommends 10W-30 (mineral oil only, no synthetics) for temps above -10°F, and also 5W-30 if temps are always below 32°F. I have always used Castrol GTX 10W-30 in our '94; still on original engine with good vacuum, good power, and reasonable fuel mileage at 100+Kmiles. (FWIW, personally I wouldn't go below a 10W-xx in this engine.)
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2010 | 04:45 PM
  #8  
Sgtblue's Avatar
Urban Combat Vet
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 12,159
Likes: 983
From: Mid-west
Originally Posted by bajaman
I would listen to this man.

....while there were some exceptions, the basic premise was indeed, "These oils are too thin to use in engines not specifically designed for them".
And that's before the varying degrees of fuel dilution that we have between changes.
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2010 | 05:43 PM
  #9  
Sideo's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member: 15 Years
Liked
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 763
Likes: 15
From: reno nevada
0w30 5w30 10w30 and 30 are all the same thickness. it is not that older engines were not made for these oils, it is that technology did no allow to create them. 30 weight is alot thicker at room temperature yes but why would u want the oil to be extra thick at room temperature. all is doing is fighting the engine until it reachea temperature and thins down.

read the article on ferrarichat form on oil for more info

to OP:
synthetic oil doesnt burn as clean so unless your omp is eliminated its noy reccomended
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2010 | 07:57 PM
  #10  
1QWIK7's Avatar
White chicks > *
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,147
Likes: 1
From: Secaucus, New Jersey
Originally Posted by Sideo
0w30 5w30 10w30 and 30 are all the same thickness. it is not that older engines were not made for these oils, it is that technology did no allow to create them. 30 weight is alot thicker at room temperature yes but why would u want the oil to be extra thick at room temperature. all is doing is fighting the engine until it reachea temperature and thins down.

read the article on ferrarichat form on oil for more info

to OP:
synthetic oil doesnt burn as clean so unless your omp is eliminated its noy reccomended

Please dont confuse the OP or start another dino vs syn oil debate.

Lots of people here are using syn oil with no problems and have a WORKING OMP.

In fact, im about to switch to royal purple my next oil change. And i have the stock OMP.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2010 | 12:42 PM
  #11  
no_more_rice's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,045
Likes: 0
From: NC
Originally Posted by Sgtblue
And that's before the varying degrees of fuel dilution that we have between changes.
+1....see my UOA thread, oil in these engines loses one or two viscosity grades in < 1,000 miles....no way I would even consider using 0w-40 in a turbo rotary, and I don't consider synthetics to be worth the investment because the OCI is so short (generally 2000 miles)

I'm running Valvoline SAE 60 Racing Oil right now (straight petroleum), I'll let you know how it looks after 2000 miles of turbo thrashing and 6-8% fuel dilution
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2010 | 02:43 PM
  #12  
no_more_rice's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,045
Likes: 0
From: NC
Originally Posted by bajaman
The modern zero, ten, and twenty weight engine oils are designed with the extremely close tolerances modern engines have. There was an article in Car&Driver/Road and Track/MotorTrend that discussed this a while back. And while there were some exceptions, the basic premise was indeed, "These oils are too thin to use in engines not specifically designed for them".
Everything is driven by increasingly stringent gas mileage standards, the manufacturers don't care how hard you may be pushing your engine.

For a street driven car that is never pushed that hard and sees little contaminaton of the oil, 5w-30 or 0w-40 is fine. It's simply the wrong application for a turbocharged rotary which subjects it's oil to ungodly contamination and high shear. I've run 5w-30 in the S2000 before and the analysis looks great; I've also seen members in s2ki run 0w-40 with no issues.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2010 | 05:38 PM
  #13  
1QWIK7's Avatar
White chicks > *
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,147
Likes: 1
From: Secaucus, New Jersey
Originally Posted by no_more_rice
+1....see my UOA thread, oil in these engines loses one or two viscosity grades in < 1,000 miles....no way I would even consider using 0w-40 in a turbo rotary, and I don't consider synthetics to be worth the investment because the OCI is so short (generally 2000 miles)

I'm running Valvoline SAE 60 Racing Oil right now (straight petroleum), I'll let you know how it looks after 2000 miles of turbo thrashing and 6-8% fuel dilution

Yeah, im using the basic castrol gtx 10w-30 and so far i put like 900 miles and the dipstick reeks of gas. Not terrible but since im driving the car more, i notice it more.

And im only in 5 weeks since last oil change.

Should i change it at 1500??
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2010 | 06:07 PM
  #14  
no_more_rice's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,045
Likes: 0
From: NC
If you're running 10w-30 I would change it evey 1,000 miles. Send a sample to Blackstone Labs and see how it looks, it's only about $20-25.

Since you already know you have fuel dilution (and all of these cars do) you may as well start running a straight 50 weight, because you can bet it's going to have the viscosity of a 30 or 40 weight (or less) within a few hundred miles.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2010 | 06:10 PM
  #15  
1QWIK7's Avatar
White chicks > *
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,147
Likes: 1
From: Secaucus, New Jersey
Originally Posted by no_more_rice
If you're running 10w-30 I would change it evey 1,000 miles. Send a sample to Blackstone Labs and see how it looks, it's only about $20-25.

Since you already know you have fuel dilution (and all of these cars do) you may as well start running a straight 50 weight, because you can bet it's going to have the apparent viscosity of a 30 or 40 weight within a few hundred miles.
Yeah i def want to send a sample of my oil. Just for the mere fact im driving the car more and im curious to see what the deal is.

Guess its time for another oil change this weekend lol. Even though usually i would have been due for almost another 2 months lol.

I was actually thinking of switching to royal purple 10w-30 next oil change.

Cost is irrelevant to me but i was wondering if you think the properties in RP would be suffice compared to going with a straight 50 weight of so and so brand, IE valvoline??

Again, cost is not a big deal for me. Im talking about in the 2 oils' properties only.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2010 | 06:57 PM
  #16  
no_more_rice's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,045
Likes: 0
From: NC
Synthetics will perform slightly better with fuel dilution, but above 4% it doesn't really matter, all of them thin significantly. I ran Amsoil 20w-50 in my car, which is one of the better synthetics out there, and it still thinned out of spec (< 10 cSt, should be at least 12.5). Viscosity is what cushions your bearings under load. I'm a believer in synthetics for most applications but this engine contaminates oil so fast it's just not worth the extra $$$.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2010 | 07:50 PM
  #17  
1QWIK7's Avatar
White chicks > *
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,147
Likes: 1
From: Secaucus, New Jersey
Originally Posted by no_more_rice
Synthetics will perform slightly better with fuel dilution, but above 4% it doesn't really matter, all of them thin significantly. I ran Amsoil 20w-50 in my car, which is one of the better synthetics out there, and it still thinned out of spec (< 10 cSt, should be at least 12.5). Viscosity is what cushions your bearings under load. I'm a believer in synthetics for most applications but this engine contaminates oil so fast it's just not worth the extra $$$.
Thanks for the advice.

I just ordered my sample kit from blackstone.

I will try RP this weekend just to see how it affects the car. Idling, oil pressure, temp etc.

I dont ever do 3k miles in a 3 month period so i wont care if RP breaks down in 3k. I will prob do about 1200 max in a 3 month period.

I just want the best oil i can get in that 3 month period of use. Or 1200 miles.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2010 | 08:52 PM
  #18  
no_more_rice's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,045
Likes: 0
From: NC
RP usually doesn't fare all that well in used oil testing (compared to Amsoil, Mobil 1 EP, Penzoil Platinium, and Valvoline Synpower) - look forward to seeing your report
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2010 | 04:51 PM
  #19  
1QWIK7's Avatar
White chicks > *
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,147
Likes: 1
From: Secaucus, New Jersey
Originally Posted by no_more_rice
RP usually doesn't fare all that well in used oil testing (compared to Amsoil, Mobil 1 EP, Penzoil Platinium, and Valvoline Synpower) - look forward to seeing your report
Well really im gonna be testing whats in the engine now (castrol gtx 10w30). Blackstone says takes 2 weeks for the kit to come in. Im thinking if i should wait til the kit comes to drain the oil (should be at about 1200 miles by then) or change it this weekend which is at 900 miles.

Since 90% of my oil changes since i owned the car had castrol gtx in it, i want to see the results of the test at about 1000 miles etc.

Cause if it shows normal results, ill just stay with castrol gtx and change every 1200-1500 miles whatever.

If not, then ill stay with RP, or whatever is out there. But i already bought the RP cause i was soo anxious to change the oil because of all these oil threads LOL
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
trickster
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
25
Jul 1, 2023 04:40 PM
BLK 93
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
4
Aug 19, 2015 03:47 AM
KAL797
Test Area 51
0
Aug 11, 2015 03:47 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:16 PM.