3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Does '99+ FD "not" have EGR hump on intake manifold?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 13, 2006 | 11:58 PM
  #1  
GoRacer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Speed Mach Go Go Go
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 4,772
Likes: 2
From: My 350Z Roadster kicks my RX7's butt
Does '99+ FD "not" have EGR hump on intake manifold?

I have retained the ACV for smog. I know i'll prolly have to tip to pass anyhow but I want to finsih what I started, since I never do. I thought about the GZ manifold but then no ACV. I have the EGR blocked off now and it's not hidden like it was with the twins. I can get the '95 sticker for the hood and even a '95 manifold but if the latest version doesn't have the hump, the hump, the hump (lovely lady lumps) then i'll try to get one of those instead.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2006 | 12:05 AM
  #2  
dclin's Avatar
Perpetual Project
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,667
Likes: 2
From: Texas
Are the smog ***** in CA really that bad? How about just bolting an EGR, and running the wires to...somewhere/anywhere.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2006 | 12:22 AM
  #3  
Matt Hey's Avatar
Old School
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 473
Likes: 0
From: Baldwin City, KS
As far as I know, none of the JDM lower intake manifolds had the EGR. I bought one a while back like this and I've seen them for sale fairly recently in the for sale forum.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2006 | 01:07 PM
  #4  
GoRacer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Speed Mach Go Go Go
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 4,772
Likes: 2
From: My 350Z Roadster kicks my RX7's butt
The EGR won't fit with my GT500R. I have the wire connector for it and the PFC ignores it, so it wouldn't have been a problem to have it plugged in for visual but the turbo is too big.

I know '95 does not have EGR but does it still have that "hump" that sticks out wherre the EGR would normally be mounted?
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2006 | 02:40 PM
  #5  
rynberg's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 10
From: San Lorenzo, California
I'll try to take a look later but I'm confused....you are bolting on a huge single turbo and you are worried about failing visual because of a missing EGR?
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2006 | 02:42 PM
  #6  
BlueRex's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,444
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA
Originally Posted by rynberg
I'll try to take a look later but I'm confused....you are bolting on a huge single turbo and you are worried about failing visual because of a missing EGR?
Sounds to me like he's saying his turbo won't fit because of the hump in the LIM where the EGR attaches to the LIM.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2006 | 02:54 PM
  #7  
GoRacer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Speed Mach Go Go Go
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 4,772
Likes: 2
From: My 350Z Roadster kicks my RX7's butt
Well it won't fit with the EGR installed, so I have to use a block off plate. I know the '95 does not have EGR, so therefore no bop for smog tech to see. If the '99+ manifolds don't have the hump then there is more clearance for the turbo and better flow because I get rid of that small turbulance.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2006 | 03:56 PM
  #8  
DaleClark's Avatar
RX-7 Bad Ass
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (56)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,622
Likes: 2,725
From: Pensacola, FL
None of the JDM cars had EGR at all - that was just an addition by Mazda for US-bound cars, same as the 3000 RPM AWS startup - the JDM manifolds don't have AWS at all, it's not in the casting of the manifold.

Shouldn't be that hard to find a good used JDM lower intake manifold. I got a hella deal a while back - JDM upper and lower manifolds, fuel rails with injectors, for $110 off Ebay .

Dale
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2006 | 04:07 PM
  #9  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,837
Likes: 3,233
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
the usa lower intake and the jdm lower intake are the same part
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2006 | 09:33 PM
  #10  
dclin's Avatar
Perpetual Project
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,667
Likes: 2
From: Texas
Originally Posted by BlueRex
Sounds to me like he's saying his turbo won't fit because of the hump in the LIM where the EGR attaches to the LIM.
I think rynberg means that the missing EGR should be the least of his worries, given that GoRacer's gone single turbo. In other words, I don't think the referee will be seeing past the big @ss, aftermarket turbo and notice the blockoff plate lol!
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2006 | 09:37 PM
  #11  
DaleClark's Avatar
RX-7 Bad Ass
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (56)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,622
Likes: 2,725
From: Pensacola, FL
Originally Posted by j9fd3s
the usa lower intake and the jdm lower intake are the same part
Not unless you're talking about the '95. The '93 and '94 US spec have the EGR valve flange and the extra vacuum line in the manifold for the EGR valve. The JDM doesn't.

I've got it in my garage right now .

Performance-wise, they should be identical. The JDM part is just cleaner, and gives more room for a big turbo.

Dale
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2006 | 09:49 PM
  #12  
GoRacer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Speed Mach Go Go Go
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 4,772
Likes: 2
From: My 350Z Roadster kicks my RX7's butt
Ok, besides the valve flange hole studs mounting location for the EGR the is a hump, mound, bulge that sticks out for the recircualtion of the air. So, the question is does the newer JDM only ('99-'02) version still have the "buldge" even if there is no hole, flange, mounting point for the EGR? I'm sure the flow won't be as good as GZ's but the main concern is clearence for the hotside of the single turbo. Not having the bop is a bonus.

Sorry, wish I could do a picture with an arrow and a circle. uhg
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2006 | 09:50 PM
  #13  
books's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,751
Likes: 46
From: St. Louis
I have a 95, although my LIM is off the car and is at a shop being polished. I am fairly certain it has the hump without the holes for the egr.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2006 | 09:55 PM
  #14  
KaiFD3S's Avatar
SINFUL7
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 6,574
Likes: 1
From: Alaska
there are LIM without the EGR I believe the JDM one, or you can buy the aftermarket LIM, just cant remember the name..
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2006 | 10:43 PM
  #15  
DaleClark's Avatar
RX-7 Bad Ass
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (56)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,622
Likes: 2,725
From: Pensacola, FL
*jogs out to garage with digital camera*

Pics of the front and back of the JDM LIM. This is, from my knowledge, what ALL the JDM LIM's are like - '93-02. Remember, there was NEVER any EGR valves on Japanese FD's, PERIOD. That was solely for the US market.

Dale
Attached Thumbnails Does '99+ FD "not" have EGR hump on intake manifold?-jdmlim1.jpg   Does '99+ FD "not" have EGR hump on intake manifold?-jdmlim2.jpg  
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2006 | 12:04 AM
  #16  
GoRacer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Speed Mach Go Go Go
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 4,772
Likes: 2
From: My 350Z Roadster kicks my RX7's butt
^ Cool beans with cheese! ok, so it has a lil hump but curves upward and gives me the clearance I want. Strange how it still has one. Thanks Dale
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DerpyToast
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
14
Nov 23, 2024 05:19 PM
rgordon1979
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
40
Mar 15, 2022 12:04 PM
ZacMan
Build Threads
4
Sep 19, 2015 09:20 PM
mulcryant
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
10
Sep 9, 2015 05:24 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:59 AM.