3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Compression Test #'s

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-19-06, 03:49 PM
  #26  
TANSTAFL

iTrader: (13)
 
alexdimen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Richmond, Va.
Posts: 3,770
Received 123 Likes on 82 Posts
Originally Posted by jacobcartmill
it is not physically possible to make that many psi with a 9.0:1 rotary.
this means physics wont allow it.

i dont think you're lucky. i think you're unlucky -that you dont know how to do a compression test- or find someone who knows how to do one correctly.

and as for the carbon buildup, that would have to be a SHITLOAD of carbon. enough to **** something else up before the compression numbers got 25psi higher than brand new (~125psi).
that's what i've been trying convey, that the only explanation is that someone fucked up the comp test... but they keep looking for some unimaginably improbable explanation.



i agree with you, there is no way that much carbon has built up in a recent rebuild without numerous other symptoms surfacing.
Old 10-19-06, 04:48 PM
  #27  
Not the company

Thread Starter
 
RE-Amemiya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 5,040
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by alexdimen
i agree with you, there is no way that much carbon has built up in a recent rebuild without numerous other symptoms surfacing.

Symptoms such as?
Old 10-19-06, 07:12 PM
  #28  
TANSTAFL

iTrader: (13)
 
alexdimen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Richmond, Va.
Posts: 3,770
Received 123 Likes on 82 Posts
excessive carbon build up enough to increase the compression ratio that much?

as a guess, your plugs would be fouling and look like **** and you would have increased wear on the seals and housings. stuck seals, carbon lock... you would know something was wrong.

if you are asking what symptoms i am referring to because you doubt me, feel free to prove me wrong... my statements are only based on common sense and math, not experiences.

if you are asking because you're scared it might be the reason for you high compression numbers and your car is running fine otherwise, i wouldn't sweat it.
Old 10-19-06, 08:17 PM
  #29  
Not the company

Thread Starter
 
RE-Amemiya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 5,040
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by alexdimen
excessive carbon build up enough to increase the compression ratio that much?

as a guess, your plugs would be fouling and look like **** and you would have increased wear on the seals and housings. stuck seals, carbon lock... you would know something was wrong.

if you are asking what symptoms i am referring to because you doubt me, feel free to prove me wrong... my statements are only based on common sense and math, not experiences.

if you are asking because you're scared it might be the reason for you high compression numbers and your car is running fine otherwise, i wouldn't sweat it.

I'm asking in general because i have no idea about compression tests, and i don't have any other symptoms with the car.
Old 10-19-06, 09:46 PM
  #30  
just dont care.

iTrader: (6)
 
jacobcartmill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 9,387
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
symptoms such as: a blown motor
Old 10-20-06, 02:15 AM
  #31  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (8)
 
RotaryResurrection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Morristown, TN (east of Knoxville)
Posts: 11,576
Received 25 Likes on 18 Posts
Compression ratio only changes static compression numbers a couple of psi one way or another. Even the 9.7 and 10:1 rotor engines only make 125psi of compression under optimal conditions.

Sounds like this test was done 1) on a cold motor and/or 2) at higher than standard cranking rpm, and/or 3) with oil in the chambers. IF you spin a rotary fast enough it will generate higher compression numbers. If you put a compression gauge in a rotary and towed it down the road with the clutch popped at 20mph, you'd be spinning 2-3k rpm and you'd see way higher compression.

The specs given are only for cranking compression at the given rpm of 250. Use of a battery boost can increase cranking rpm. Testing a cold engine will also raise numbers...rotaries make more compression cold than hot. This is why borderline engines start right up when cold, but have hot-start flooding problems when trying to restart warm...the compression drops just below the flooding threshold when hot, and raises just above it when cold.

Any oil in the chamblers during the test will yeild an artificial high number as well. So if you inject oil or atf before the test you are not running an accurate test. The oil takes up the gaps between the housing and seals and makes for a tighter seal with zero blowby. I've seen 40psi added by injecting oil and running a test, but once it burns off the compression goes right back to where it used to be. This is another reason not to test a cold motor...by design, there is some oil drainage that pools up at the bottom of the chamber when the rotary has sat for several hours (omp injection drainage, seep-by from non-moving oil control rings that are trying to hold thin oil in mid air). So testing a cold motor stirs this pooled oil up, again sealing the gaps and making for artificial high numbers.

I have NEVER seen a rotary test higher than 125psi hot, at the specified 250rpm. I have tested a LOT of engines as you might imagine.
Old 10-20-06, 06:27 AM
  #32  
Moderator

iTrader: (7)
 
dgeesaman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Fort Kickass
Posts: 12,302
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally Posted by RotaryResurrection
Compression ratio only changes static compression numbers a couple of psi one way or another. Even the 9.7 and 10:1 rotor engines only make 125psi of compression under optimal conditions.
There is a theoretical limit even when the engine is sealed up well with oil: for 9:1 it would be 9 bar (130.5psi), for 10:1 it would be 10 bar (145.0 psi). His numbers are above that.

Dave
Old 10-20-06, 08:46 AM
  #33  
Not the company

Thread Starter
 
RE-Amemiya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 5,040
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
I don't know how much temperature would cause the numbers to jump that high, but i know that the techs never drove the car before doing the test. The car sat on the lot for a day and a half.

I appreciate the info about these things as well.
Old 10-20-06, 03:31 PM
  #34  
~17 MPG

iTrader: (2)
 
scotty305's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Bend, OR
Posts: 3,292
Received 226 Likes on 152 Posts
[QUOTE=rx7twinturboboy]I don't know how much temperature would cause the numbers to jump that high, but i know that the techs never drove the car before doing the test. The car sat on the lot for a day and a half.QUOTE]


That's your answer right there. The FSM clearly states that you should warm the car up to operating temperature before performing a compression test.


More info here:
http://www.fd3s.net/compression_test.html


There might be a temperature correction chart listed in the FSM, but I can't say for sure as I don't have a copy with me at the moment.

-s-
Old 10-20-06, 04:02 PM
  #35  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (8)
 
RotaryResurrection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Morristown, TN (east of Knoxville)
Posts: 11,576
Received 25 Likes on 18 Posts
I usually see 5-10psi higher on a cold test versus a warm test on the same engine, regardless of the actual compression numbers. So if an engine measures 115 hot it might measure 120-125 cold. Or if it measures 95 hot it might measure 100-105 cold.
Old 10-20-06, 04:09 PM
  #36  
Moderator

iTrader: (7)
 
dgeesaman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Fort Kickass
Posts: 12,302
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
You can idle the engine to get it warm. It doesn't have to go anywhere.

I'm not aware of any temperature correction. There is a correction for RPM and I think altitude, but that's it.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ZacMan
Build Threads
4
09-19-15 09:20 PM
Blk 93
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
11
09-09-15 10:56 AM
SCinfidel
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
4
09-08-15 05:36 PM
ZaqAtaq
New Member RX-7 Technical
2
09-05-15 08:57 PM



Quick Reply: Compression Test #'s



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:41 PM.