3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

BNR Sequential vs. Single

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-31-04, 11:45 PM
  #26  
SINFUL7

iTrader: (37)
 
KaiFD3S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alaska
Posts: 6,574
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
hey Goodfella, do you think that those bnr's that you have will last preety long, let's say if you keep it at 17 lbs of boost..
Old 08-31-04, 11:49 PM
  #27  
WTB** Very Low Miles 94-95

 
artguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Tejas
Posts: 3,298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SPOautos
But at what point does it go from being "hype" to being real? The ONLY thing people talk about are real and proven numbers, whats hype about that. Having a dyno sheet then having track numbers to back it up is factual, its real and all the numbers jive. Fact is like Artguy said, its difficult to get everything together and running right. Even when people get good dyno numbers half the time its short lived before they start to have problems and they never get track times out of it. Do a post in the single turbo section and find out how many 3rd gens on the forum have trapped 125 or better on pump gas....you know what your gong to find? Barely any at all, matter of fact I think there are only about 5 and 3 of those people (including myself) had some form of stock twins. What does that say about singles? Does that mean that to BNR upgrades are better than all of those singles that no one has track numbers on cause they cant back thier stuff up and they are all hype? NO, of course not...it just means its real rare for someone to get thier car in the condition that it needs to be in to get good dyno number AND track numbers to back it up. It has nothing to do with BNR twins, there are very few people that have good high hp dyno numbers and track numbers period...no matter what turbos are on thier car.

And for the record I wasnt happy with 300-350rwhp....I was there years ago. My next goal is 130+mph traps on pump gas....and yea I'll still drive it to work all the time just like I did in the past.

STEPHEN
werd
Old 09-01-04, 03:55 PM
  #28  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
radkins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Waiting for Indykid to catch up
Posts: 1,236
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Water/Alcohol injection rules!
Old 09-01-04, 04:18 PM
  #29  
Original Gangster/Rotary!


iTrader: (213)
 
GoodfellaFD3S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Posts: 30,529
Received 539 Likes on 326 Posts
Originally Posted by KaiFD3S
hey Goodfella, do you think that those bnr's that you have will last preety long, let's say if you keep it at 17 lbs of boost..
Sure, without a doubt. These new BNRs are head and shoulders above the old style, and I am not knocking the old ones either. These new ones have been worry free for me thus far. Not one drop of oil, no oil smoke, boost every time.

at 17 psi on pump gas over a period of time it is not the BNRs I worry about....it's the quality of the gas and the chance of detonation. I am prolly going to run 15 more often than not.

Rich
Old 09-01-04, 04:28 PM
  #30  
SINFUL7

iTrader: (37)
 
KaiFD3S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alaska
Posts: 6,574
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by GoodfellaFD3S
Sure, without a doubt. These new BNRs are head and shoulders above the old style, and I am not knocking the old ones either. These new ones have been worry free for me thus far. Not one drop of oil, no oil smoke, boost every time.

at 17 psi on pump gas over a period of time it is not the BNRs I worry about....it's the quality of the gas and the chance of detonation. I am prolly going to run 15 more often than not.

Rich
now that give's me some things to think about because I plan to go single in January my goal is to get 400 RWHP but if I could get even 350 on the twins I might be happy with that and would not have to spend to much and an easier R&R job..Hmmmmm got me thinking now...
Old 09-01-04, 05:53 PM
  #31  
Hey, where did my $$$ go?

 
SPOautos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Bimingham, AL
Posts: 4,413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just in case some of you dont know, the new BNR's are 100% brand new turbos they are NOT just rebuilt twins with upgraded wheels. The bearings housings and all is aftermarket. The only thing at all thats stock on them is the intake and turbine housing.
Old 09-02-04, 12:11 AM
  #32  
built my own engine

 
93BlackFD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Buckhead, Atlanta
Posts: 3,470
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
i guess my statements were geared mainly torward the initial release of the stage 3 BNR's....

the newer ones, from the pics i have seen, do seem to be completely ingenious

i just want to see more than two people showing some numbers from them
Old 09-02-04, 12:44 AM
  #33  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
FD from R1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: DET
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
David Garfinkle is running the BNR stage IIIs and will be tuning his car on the dyno soon....his car is amazing

I'll post up a dyno sheet if he gives me the ok (he doesn't own a computer)
Old 09-02-04, 02:04 AM
  #34  
WTB** Very Low Miles 94-95

 
artguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Tejas
Posts: 3,298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
garfinkle...you mean you have dyno sheets!!! post those things man.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
matty
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
40
10-06-15 09:13 PM
GKW
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
5
09-28-15 04:34 PM



Quick Reply: BNR Sequential vs. Single



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:07 AM.