3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Blown Again: Need Help with Future Plans

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 5, 2010 | 03:05 PM
  #51  
RotaryEvolution's Avatar
Sharp Claws
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,107
Likes: 50
From: Central Florida
Originally Posted by YoshiFC3S
I'll be the first to admit my ignorance regarding my mechanics, rotary motors in general, and my own car, let alone tuning.

It isn't my intention to smear anybody's name, so lets get past that point. My opinion is based solely on my own ignorance, so give me the benefit of the doubt on that one. I'm admitting my n00bness.

Lets get past this.

As of today, I am leaning strongly towards Brent's streetported/3mm Atkins seal motor. I am still in the market for the next few weeks or so, if another deal comes by.

I can at least say I now have cash-in-hand to purchase whatever motor I chose to. That's progress.

I wanted to ask another question to everyone, if I may.

Is 18psi on 90/91 California gas while running a stronger (ported/2mm or 3mm) motor WITH methanol/water injection safe, and realistic, given proper tuning?
yes it is safe IF the auxiliary injection never fails or it has failsafes that protect the motor if it does. i have customers running pump gas and aux injection who have been pushing 18 for some time, the higher you go though the more you have to be precise and retune, it definitely isn't for daily driving at 16PSI+ unless you are confident in the car/tuner or do your own tuning.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2010 | 03:12 PM
  #52  
YoshiFD3S's Avatar
Thread Starter
FD + 2JZGTE = WIN! **D
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,670
Likes: 0
From: King George, VA USA
Originally Posted by thewird
Yes, but make sure your AI system is reliable and has failsafes to cut boost if it stops working so the system itself needs to have monitors to know if it stops working. A good system like the FJO (can get a linked boost controller) or Aquamist would do this for you.

thewird
From my research thus far, fail-safes such as low-level and electronic failure being linked to the boost controller seem like a fairly standard feature among the numerous kits on the market.

The only real concern I have, is regarding air/fuel maps. If my car is tuned at 18psi with the meth kit functioning fine, even if the meth kit will turn the boost down to wastegate (11psi for me) as part of the fail-safe...will simply turning the boost down be enough?

Is there such a thing, that could perhaps send a signal to the Power FC to adjust air/fuel maps while the meth kit is simultaneously sending the ground signal to my boost controller?

Currently, I am the most interested in AEM's meth injection kit, found here: http://www.aemelectronics.com/index.php?cPath=23

The kit seems very user-friendly, even "entry level" in my own words...and provides numerous fail-safes, as well as adjustable meth-injection PSI based upon increases in boost.

Does anyone have any experience with this AEM kit?
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2010 | 03:13 PM
  #53  
YoshiFD3S's Avatar
Thread Starter
FD + 2JZGTE = WIN! **D
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,670
Likes: 0
From: King George, VA USA
Originally Posted by Karack
yes it is safe IF the auxiliary injection never fails or it has failsafes that protect the motor if it does. i have customers running pump gas and aux injection who have been pushing 18 for some time, the higher you go though the more you have to be precise and retune, it definitely isn't for daily driving at 16PSI+ unless you are confident in the car/tuner or do your own tuning.
I'm not the type of driver to boost every second I get..I'm more the type of driver who's mindset is "If there's a reason for me to go full throttle, then I WANT every ounce of the power my car was tuned for."
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2010 | 03:16 PM
  #54  
RotaryEvolution's Avatar
Sharp Claws
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,107
Likes: 50
From: Central Florida
the best thing you can do is have your tuner tune it a little rich on the seam point around wastegate pressure and then tune to the methanol beyond that point. there is a 2 switch function in the power FC but i don't recall what exactly it did, even if you can switch maps it won't react fast enough, even most failsafes short of a pressure release in the intake pipe is a bit too slow to react during a failure. the best setups i have seen release most if not all boost in the intake when a failure occurs. this requires a pressure canister and a switch that feeds to the pop-off valve.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2010 | 03:26 PM
  #55  
Howard Coleman's Avatar
Racing Rotary Since 1983
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,279
Likes: 728
From: Florence, Alabama
"even if the meth kit will turn the boost down to wastegate (11psi for me) as part of the fail-safe...will simply turning the boost down be enough?"

a great question

the answer is... if the meth malfunctions and you are "tuned up" for it you need help

on the next rotor face!!!

that's why anything supposed to save you boost related is a, uh, joke.

the only save is with an ignition cut or retard. i have both. in 4 years i haven't needed them.

howard
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2010 | 03:34 PM
  #56  
thewird's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,603
Likes: 15
From: Toronto, Canada
If you tune with pure water, its not as big of an issue since your not relying on the meth for fuel. You might want to do more reading in the AI section to properly decide but for 18 PSi pure water is more then enough. I've run my car at 20 PSi with 900cc's of tap water at the track and many have done higher making gobs of power as well. I probably didn't need so much water but I had setup my system to replace 25% of my fuel with methanol. I still haven't gotten around to doing that since I have to redo my tank design.

Anyway, I would not use the AEM. The system has no way of monitoring itself (line pressure, flow etc.). In my opinion the AEM system is more for someone who just wants their car to run cooler and keep the internals clean while providing a little bit of safety.

thewird
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2010 | 03:42 PM
  #57  
thewird's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,603
Likes: 15
From: Toronto, Canada
Originally Posted by howard coleman
"even if the meth kit will turn the boost down to wastegate (11psi for me) as part of the fail-safe...will simply turning the boost down be enough?"

a great question

the answer is... if the meth malfunctions and you are "tuned up" for it you need help

on the next rotor face!!!

that's why anything supposed to save you boost related is a, uh, joke.

the only save is with an ignition cut or retard. i have both. in 4 years i haven't needed them.

howard
This is true but its better then no failsafe at all and I can only assume having an ignition cut isn't very simple to implement. Howard, how do you have ignition cut system with your FJO system?

thewird
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2010 | 03:59 PM
  #58  
no_more_rice's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,045
Likes: 0
From: NC
Mosport: best track in North America imo
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2010 | 04:03 PM
  #59  
thewird's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,603
Likes: 15
From: Toronto, Canada
Originally Posted by no_more_rice
Mosport: best track in North America imo
. Calabogie is pretty comparable too, it keeps you busier with lots of corners and minor elevation changes. But nothing beats high-speed massive elevation changing blind corners that Mosport provides ^_^. Of course I can only speak for Canadian tracks as thats all I've been too.

thewird
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2010 | 05:55 PM
  #60  
YoshiFD3S's Avatar
Thread Starter
FD + 2JZGTE = WIN! **D
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,670
Likes: 0
From: King George, VA USA
Ruh-roh...

We went off-topic again...

:P
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2010 | 05:58 PM
  #61  
bewtew's Avatar
1BAD20B
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,949
Likes: 3
From: LA
this whole thread is off topic.. you ask for help on how to make 400whp safe and ppl get into a crazy discussion about 2mm vs 3mm seals.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2010 | 06:07 PM
  #62  
YoshiFD3S's Avatar
Thread Starter
FD + 2JZGTE = WIN! **D
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,670
Likes: 0
From: King George, VA USA
Originally Posted by bewtew
this whole thread is off topic.. you ask for help on how to make 400whp safe and ppl get into a crazy discussion about 2mm vs 3mm seals.
Allright then.

What's your suggestion on making 400rwhp on 90/91 octane with a built motor and meth injection?

:P
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2010 | 07:15 PM
  #63  
dradon03's Avatar
Derwin
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,888
Likes: 0
From: MTL, QC
I feel like I am looking in the mirror.

Stock engine
FJO Driver
FJO Aux Inj
GT35R from Turblown.net 1.00A/R
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2010 | 07:21 PM
  #64  
bewtew's Avatar
1BAD20B
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,949
Likes: 3
From: LA
:/
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2010 | 07:28 PM
  #65  
no_more_rice's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,045
Likes: 0
From: NC
I'll never understand the fascination with 400+ rwhp and all the extra headaches and questionable relaibility that go with it when 360-380 rock soild reliable wheel hp is easily within reach, and it's been proven the single turbo dyno queens aren't faster at the track or even at the strip in many cases (street tires and stock rear end at least)

Last edited by no_more_rice; Jan 5, 2010 at 07:30 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2010 | 07:40 PM
  #66  
thewird's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,603
Likes: 15
From: Toronto, Canada
Originally Posted by no_more_rice
I'll never understand the fascination with 400+ rwhp and all the extra headaches and questionable relaibility that go with it when 360-380 rock soild reliable wheel hp is easily within reach, and it's been proven the single turbo dyno queens aren't faster at the track or even at the strip in many cases (street tires and stock rear end at least)
I lol'd inside. I'll leave it to Howard for the details...

https://www.rx7club.com/3rd-generation-specific-1993-2002-16/fd-turbod-rotary-engine-ccp-central-challenge-819225/

thewird
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2010 | 10:39 PM
  #67  
dradon03's Avatar
Derwin
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,888
Likes: 0
From: MTL, QC
I lol'd outside the rotary power game is much different I feel from today say to 3 years ago.

The difference between 400 rwhp and 380 rwhp could be exhaust and intake differences. The questions must be more specific rather at what boost levels, AFRS and EGTs the car makes xxx rwhp.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2010 | 09:40 AM
  #68  
no_more_rice's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,045
Likes: 0
From: NC
http://www.importtuner.com/features/...nge/index.html

This guy didn't need 400 rwhp to kick some single turbo Supra *** at the track, and that should tell you something. Mindlessly pursuing numbers to keep up with the latest internet gossip train is a complete waste of time. This car probably had 320-330 at most. Big hair dryer single turbo 13bs are extremely peaky in their power delivery and not at all track friendly. I'll take driveability over a dyno queen, which is useless in the corners. any day of the week.

Last edited by no_more_rice; Jan 6, 2010 at 09:42 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2010 | 10:21 PM
  #69  
GoodfellaFD3S's Avatar
Original Gangster/Rotary!
Veteran: Army
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (213)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 30,800
Likes: 646
From: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Arrow

Originally Posted by YoshiFC3S
Allright then.

What's your suggestion on making 400rwhp on 90/91 octane with a built motor and meth injection?

:P
What do you want to know that hasn't been posted many times before ?

Get a good high quality water injection system, I love Aquamist. Spray windshield wiper fluid into your engine after around 8-9 psi.

Get the car tuned properly by a *rotary* tuner to a little over 1 bar boost.

Make sure all auxiliary systems are up to snuff-- ie fuel, ignition, cooling.

Done.

Kinda sucks running on 91 octane **** water, but you shouldnt have any problems making 400 rwhp.

I get the feeling I should close this meandering thread, as it's not really going anywhere
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2010 | 10:45 PM
  #70  
Deals Gap Rotary Rally's Avatar
DGRR 2014, 4/25-4/27/2014
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 792
Likes: 1
From: Deals Gap, USA
No one cares about my opinion about 400RWHP.. but here it goes..

If you want reliability, go with Mazda OEM.. Its proven with thousands of engines contrary to what some might say, its been proven (especially if you are going to get it tune by "rotary" tuner). My favorite tuner at this point is Ray from PFS. If I were to get someone tune besides myself, it would be him.. I liked his approached on tuning and how he dealt with his customers. If you are planning to tune PFC by yourself, i would get Chuck's notes and take your time doing it yourself.

If you are going to tune it yourself or by someone who's not so qualified tuner, than go with RA seals (2mm or 3mm). Like others said it will give you some lead way and not have to build it. But those seals might not last as long (debatable and not much data to prove who's right or wrong). Also regarding 3mm, I don't think its really the seals that cause chatter but they way some machines the rotor and if its within spec before building the engine. Again, that's my opinion.

I also believe in 13B-RE LIM/UIM and I think it has more potential. But that's also debatable and more opinion based. But I have to say, I've seen quite of bit of 13B-RE set up that made decent power... hence why I'm going with one and with 3mm RA seals so I could really test out my tuning skills.. I mean, you have to learn somehow right??
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2010 | 01:56 PM
  #71  
Deals Gap Rotary Rally's Avatar
DGRR 2014, 4/25-4/27/2014
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 792
Likes: 1
From: Deals Gap, USA
Regarding to Seal debate.. Mazda made 5-6mm seals in the past. I was fortunate enough to pick up a brand new set of these seals that I'm going to install in my next engine to make 600HP

Reply
Old Jan 10, 2010 | 02:04 PM
  #72  
thewird's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,603
Likes: 15
From: Toronto, Canada
^ 10A seals ftw. Why not just go with 3mm one piece ceramic or were you joking? I'm very happy how mine can take 14 AFR audible detonation @ 16 PSi multiple times and still live.

thewird
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2010 | 02:09 PM
  #73  
Deals Gap Rotary Rally's Avatar
DGRR 2014, 4/25-4/27/2014
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 792
Likes: 1
From: Deals Gap, USA
I was just joking.. And you are right!! 10A old school seals. I got them because it was new and never seen them in person.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2010 | 04:26 PM
  #74  
no_more_rice's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,045
Likes: 0
From: NC
I've heard the thicker seals don't seal as well
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2010 | 07:06 PM
  #75  
YoshiFD3S's Avatar
Thread Starter
FD + 2JZGTE = WIN! **D
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,670
Likes: 0
From: King George, VA USA
Originally Posted by no_more_rice
I've heard the thicker seals don't seal as well
The "word' is that you typically don't see as high of compression numbers on 3mm compared to 2mm.

Any truth to that?
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:03 AM.