3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Best fast acting IAT sensor options with Adaptronic ecu

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 15, 2016 | 09:24 AM
  #1  
mikey13b's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 187
Likes: 1
From: Sydney
Best fast acting IAT sensor options with Adaptronic ecu

Hi guys,
Im wondering which the best options are for a fast acting IAT sensor . I'll be using an adaptronic select ecu.
I've read through a bunch of threads and see the triumph and gm sensors being used often, are these the best options?

Thanks guys!
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2016 | 05:12 PM
  #2  
Turblown's Avatar
Turn up the boost
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,174
Likes: 236
From: Twin Cities, MN
Just get a GM unit. The resistance values vs temperatures are readily available.
__________________
Rotary Performance Parts


Reply
Old Sep 15, 2016 | 06:15 PM
  #3  
DC5Daniel's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,631
Likes: 89
From: Peachtree City, GA
Originally Posted by mikey13b
Hi guys,
Im wondering which the best options are for a fast acting IAT sensor . I'll be using an adaptronic select ecu.
I've read through a bunch of threads and see the triumph and gm sensors being used often, are these the best options?

Thanks guys!
The Triumph sensor is popular because it threads into the stock location and the resistance curve is within (or close enough to) the tolerances of the FD sensor.
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2016 | 08:15 PM
  #4  
mikey13b's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 187
Likes: 1
From: Sydney
Originally Posted by Turblown
Just get a GM unit. The resistance values vs temperatures are readily available.
These need a new thread tapped is that right?
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2016 | 08:20 PM
  #5  
mikey13b's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 187
Likes: 1
From: Sydney
Originally Posted by DC5Daniel
The Triumph sensor is popular because it threads into the stock location and the resistance curve is within (or close enough to) the tolerances of the FD sensor.
Seeing I'm using an aftermarket ECU is it any benefit that this sensor has a similar resistance curve to the stock one?
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2016 | 08:39 PM
  #6  
Turblown's Avatar
Turn up the boost
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,174
Likes: 236
From: Twin Cities, MN
Originally Posted by mikey13b
Seeing I'm using an aftermarket ECU is it any benefit that this sensor has a similar resistance curve to the stock one?
No. This is a popular mod on an ecu that you cannot configure the engine sensors.

Generally we move the IAT sensor directly out of the cold side piping on the intercooler.
__________________
Rotary Performance Parts


Reply
Old Sep 15, 2016 | 09:28 PM
  #7  
mikey13b's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 187
Likes: 1
From: Sydney
Originally Posted by Turblown
Generally we move the IAT sensor directly out of the cold side piping on the intercooler.
I'll be fitting a WI nozzle in the elbow before the throttle body, so will need the sensor post that...
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2016 | 03:12 AM
  #8  
RGHTBrainDesign's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,666
Likes: 88
From: San Jose, CA
This is what my research lead me to. I'm going to drop the values right in and call it a day:




Xenocron Tuning Solutions: Race-Spec Temperature Sensor
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2016 | 05:22 AM
  #9  
mikey13b's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 187
Likes: 1
From: Sydney
Originally Posted by SirLaughsALot
This is what my research lead me to. I'm going to drop the values right in and call it a day:
So what were your conclusions that led you to chose this sensor over others?
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2016 | 06:24 PM
  #10  
cewrx7r1's Avatar
Eye In The Sky
Tenured Member: 25 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 7,941
Likes: 133
From: In A Disfunctional World
According to the data sheet: response time is less than 15 seconds.

Not impressive at all.
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2016 | 04:14 PM
  #11  
Monkman33's Avatar
Goodfalla Engine Complete
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,243
Likes: 42
From: Kennewick, Washington
Originally Posted by cewrx7r1
According to the data sheet: response time is less than 15 seconds.

Not impressive at all.
that way it can react when you're driving back to the pits after your quarter mile run.
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2016 | 03:45 AM
  #12  
mikey13b's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 187
Likes: 1
From: Sydney
Lol
In terms of performance is there a benefit of the GM unit over the Triumph?
Using the existing hole would make life easier, but if the GM unit is a superior sensor then I will happy to tap a new thread.

Last edited by mikey13b; Sep 19, 2016 at 08:50 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2016 | 02:23 PM
  #13  
FD3S2005's Avatar
SideWayZ The Only Way
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,945
Likes: 32
From: Davie, Florida
Most go with triumph for ease of use for like stated before having the same thread pattern to go in the stock location, i had it there for about 2 years before i had to rebuild and we moved it the i/c pipping, and i still have the same sensor and it works just fine, its up to you what you want, even if 1 is slightly better for some whatever reason, they both will give you a quick accurate temp readings

Last edited by FD3S2005; Oct 1, 2016 at 02:28 PM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
shadow24v
Single Turbo RX-7's
16
Mar 14, 2017 07:22 PM
Redliner223
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
7
Sep 16, 2016 08:13 PM
blk88t2
Megasquirt Forum
1
Sep 14, 2016 09:58 AM
craaaazzy
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
2
Sep 13, 2016 12:45 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:17 AM.