3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

BARELY failed emissions, need suggestions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-03-08, 11:52 AM
  #1  
Darkside FD

Thread Starter
 
cozmo kraemer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: AZ
Posts: 1,175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BARELY failed emissions, need suggestions

I have a very heavily modified single turbo FD. With the placement of the turbo I can't install a mechanical air pump so this is my emissions test without the airpump.

AZ does an IM-147 test which is on a dyno at varying speeds to represent real world driving. My results were this

Measured Standard
HC 0.81 0.80
*** 8.23 12.00
NOx 1.52 2.00

I know high HC could be related to ignition or a misfire so I replaced my spark plugs (now the stock 9 and 7 configuration) and changed my oil. I went back and retested thinking I would pass and HC got worse.

Second test

Measured Standard
HC 0.87 0.80
*** 5.23 12.00
NOx 1.72 2.00

Is there anything I can do to help the HC? I was thinking I may be running a little too lean and that leading to a misfire... I am not sure. I read a technical paper on this and a too lean condition could lead to higher HC. I have some cells when they were on the dyno that were in the 18:1 range, and also some cells in the 12:1 range. The problem is these are so far off of normal driving conditions that it is really difficult to tune them.

I know an electric airpump would easily fix the problem but I dont want to go and buy one to pass when I am so close without it. Any suggestions?
Old 01-03-08, 12:11 PM
  #2  
Lift Off in T-Minus...

iTrader: (6)
 
afgmoto1978's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Kingman, AZ
Posts: 2,911
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Add Alcohol to fuel and change map to compensate.

Rig an air bottle with a line to the cat, lol. Don't do it.

Add pass emission additive to fuel.
Old 01-03-08, 12:23 PM
  #3  
Racecar - Formula 2000

 
DaveW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Bath, OH
Posts: 3,850
Received 277 Likes on 198 Posts
What cat are you using? Did you run the car long enough to get the cat good and hot before the test?

Dave
Old 01-03-08, 12:39 PM
  #4  
needs more track time

iTrader: (16)
 
gracer7-rx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bay Area CA
Posts: 9,188
Received 509 Likes on 350 Posts
fwiw, rx8 uses an electric air pump iirc
Old 01-03-08, 12:49 PM
  #5  
Darkside FD

Thread Starter
 
cozmo kraemer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: AZ
Posts: 1,175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
With an electric air pump I know i would pass. I drove around for probably 20 minutes to get the car warm. I am using a Magnaflow cat right now that has the air pump attachment but I have it plugged. It has seen MAYBE 10,000 miles of use over the two years I have had it. I really doubt even that much...

I think it is all in the way the guy drives the car on the rollers. The last guy was totally erratic. Full throttle, then totally lugging the engine. The first guy stalled the car twice trying to do the test. IF I could drive the car, it would pass. I was just wondering if anyone knew of any tricks to lower HC?

I used some alcohol in the second test, I was just wondering if using alcohol helped with HC or the other gases? Using alcohol seemed to lean my car out further though, so maybe it was a source of my problems in the second test...
Old 01-03-08, 01:02 PM
  #6  
Racecar - Formula 2000

 
DaveW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Bath, OH
Posts: 3,850
Received 277 Likes on 198 Posts
Originally Posted by cozmo kraemer
I used some alcohol in the second test, I was just wondering if using alcohol helped with HC or the other gases? Using alcohol seemed to lean my car out further though, so maybe it was a source of my problems in the second test...
The 2nd test results did look like the result of a slightly leaner mixture (higher NOX & HC), so maybe w/o the alcohol it MIGHT be better.

Are you still using the ACV?

Dave
Old 01-03-08, 01:11 PM
  #7  
slo
registered user

iTrader: (1)
 
slo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Alcohol makes the car run leaner and helps with HC which is unburnt fuel at the expense of increasing nox. Hotter spark plugs often also help

Many other cars including I believe LSX based GM's come with electric air pumps it should be cheap and easy to find one.

first one found in search: http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/00-04...spagenameZWD1V
Old 01-03-08, 01:14 PM
  #8  
Racecar - Formula 2000

 
DaveW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Bath, OH
Posts: 3,850
Received 277 Likes on 198 Posts
Originally Posted by slo
Alcohol makes the car run leaner and helps with HC which is unburnt fuel at the expense of increasing nox. Hotter spark plugs often also help

Many other cars including I believe LSX based GM's come with electric air pumps it should be cheap and easy to find one.
The reason I said that higher HC might indicate leaner, is that too lean causes misfires, raising HC's. I should have explained that better...

Dave
Old 01-03-08, 01:16 PM
  #9  
sleeper
iTrader: (6)
 
4CN A1R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Abbottstown, PA
Posts: 1,957
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Move to somewere theres no emissions
Old 01-03-08, 02:19 PM
  #10  
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary

iTrader: (14)
 
moconnor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 4,660
Received 82 Likes on 49 Posts
Originally Posted by 4CN A1R
Move to somewere theres no emissions
You mean the flyover states?
Old 01-03-08, 02:22 PM
  #11  
cp1
Full Member
 
cp1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Saskatoon
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
put in a higher temp thermostat and lower your boost levels, hotter engine running temps lead to an overall decrease in hydrocarbon emissions.
Old 01-03-08, 02:23 PM
  #12  
sleeper
iTrader: (6)
 
4CN A1R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Abbottstown, PA
Posts: 1,957
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by moconnor
You mean the flyover states?
i dont know wat you mean by "flyover" states but i know florida has no emissions and some random countys throughout the U.S.
Old 01-03-08, 03:30 PM
  #13  
GorillaRaceEngineering.co

iTrader: (1)
 
Gorilla RE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 2,048
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Louisiana has NO emissions testing
Old 01-03-08, 03:49 PM
  #14  
FD Under Construction =P

iTrader: (5)
 
dhahlen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Avondale, AZ
Posts: 4,030
Received 24 Likes on 9 Posts
put a quart or two of denatured alcohol in the tank and drive around for a bit... thats what i did, cleared things right up, car ran like butt until it burned it all out.
Old 01-03-08, 04:11 PM
  #15  
Darkside FD

Thread Starter
 
cozmo kraemer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: AZ
Posts: 1,175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am going to tune the map to run 15:1 or so on the alcohol mixture. I had the map tuned nicely for regular gasoline, put the alcohol in and all of the sudden I am two points leaner on my wideband. I think that is what hurt me. Maybe I should try it with the new plugs on straight gasoline?

If I was way off I would for sure be buying an electric air pump and rigging it up, but I dont want to go through the hassle if I can fix it with something cheap and easier...
Old 01-03-08, 04:14 PM
  #16  
Darkside FD

Thread Starter
 
cozmo kraemer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: AZ
Posts: 1,175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by cp1
put in a higher temp thermostat and lower your boost levels, hotter engine running temps lead to an overall decrease in hydrocarbon emissions.
This may be part of the problem. My car runs at 83 degrees C all the time now that I have no intercooler. I have the stock thermostat.. Maybe I should unplug the fans and let it sit till it gets up in the 90s C and then do the test. I heard that when the flame front hits the cooler walls of the chamber it produces more HC emissions...when the walls of the chamber are hotter it lessens the HC emissions which is probably why Mazda made these cars run so hot.
Old 01-03-08, 04:18 PM
  #17  
Lift Off in T-Minus...

iTrader: (6)
 
afgmoto1978's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Kingman, AZ
Posts: 2,911
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Maybe also do a water steam clean to your engine to remove unburned deposits in the engine. Just a though.
Old 01-03-08, 05:13 PM
  #18  
Darkside FD

Thread Starter
 
cozmo kraemer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: AZ
Posts: 1,175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by afgmoto1978
Maybe also do a water steam clean to your engine to remove unburned deposits in the engine. Just a though.
How do you do this without hydrolock?

I have water injection...and the engine is only about 6K miles out of a fresh rebuild.
Old 01-03-08, 09:30 PM
  #19  
"Elusive, not deceptive!”

 
Barry Bordes's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Slidell, LA
Posts: 930
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
You are so close.
Going from rich to lean, HC and CO are decreasing while NO is increasing. The best compromise is at stoich 14.7AFR.
Your use of the hotter (7's and 9's) sparkplugs to keep engine miss to a minimum is a good idea also.
It sounds like you have to smooth the AFR's in the test range better (12-19AFR's is probably killing you).
What timing and split are you using in that range?
Barry

Last edited by Barry Bordes; 01-03-08 at 09:44 PM.
Old 01-04-08, 10:35 AM
  #20  
Lift Off in T-Minus...

iTrader: (6)
 
afgmoto1978's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Kingman, AZ
Posts: 2,911
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Nevermind, if you got water injection the motor is already steam cleaned.
Old 01-04-08, 10:58 AM
  #21  
Full Member

iTrader: (2)
 
wolfman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 175
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by cozmo kraemer
With an electric air pump I know i would pass. I drove around for probably 20 minutes to get the car warm. I am using a Magnaflow cat right now that has the air pump attachment but I have it plugged. It has seen MAYBE 10,000 miles of use over the two years I have had it. I really doubt even that much...

I think it is all in the way the guy drives the car on the rollers. The last guy was totally erratic. Full throttle, then totally lugging the engine. The first guy stalled the car twice trying to do the test. IF I could drive the car, it would pass. I was just wondering if anyone knew of any tricks to lower HC?

I used some alcohol in the second test, I was just wondering if using alcohol helped with HC or the other gases? Using alcohol seemed to lean my car out further though, so maybe it was a source of my problems in the second test...
They don't seem to have a formula for who drives it b/c I have taken many cars, both automatic & manual and sometimes they insist on driving it and sometimes they let me do it. It probably depends on the person at the emissions doing your car at that time.

I have definitely seen they are more likely to let you drive the car if it is manual. Not sure if yours is manual or automatic.

I don't know if you live in Phoenix or Tucson, but when I bought my FD (manual) in September I took mine to the emissions on Valencia & I-19 and I was the one who drove it during the test.

If yours is manual and live in Tucson, maybe try taking to that emissions location?
Old 01-04-08, 01:45 PM
  #22  
Tequila? ..it's like beer

iTrader: (1)
 
NewbernD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Woodbine, MD
Posts: 1,124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm due for emissions soon (on my second extension..) I'll give it a chance to pass as is (stainless cat and no pump) but when it fails, I think my plan is:
- Uber lean tune. Won't fail you for NOx on a 93.
- disconnecting the charge pipe and run N/A
- borrow stock cat
- plumb some of the charge into the cat air pipe. Since I don't have an air pump this would be the easiest way to get air into the cat without electric BS.

Good luck.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jeff20B
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
73
09-16-18 07:16 PM
RedBaronII
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
4
09-20-15 11:29 AM
ZacMan
Build Threads
4
09-19-15 09:20 PM
JP's 93 fd
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
5
09-16-15 01:12 PM
localized
New Member RX-7 Technical
3
09-16-15 12:18 AM



Quick Reply: BARELY failed emissions, need suggestions



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:47 AM.