3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Baffled by FD's fuel system

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 03:55 PM
  #1  
Crazy_Jake's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 373
Likes: 0
From: Clovis, NM
Baffled by FD's fuel system

When it comes to fuel supply, I'm lost. I now nothing of injector flow rates, duty cycles, FPR's, fuel pump flow rates, and how you calculate what is needed for a certain hp. I think this is something for the FD that doesn't get enough attention. There are so many setups that I've seen. One fuel pump or two, additional injectors or not, custom fuel rail or modified stock one, in-line fuel pump or in-tank, bigger supply and return lines, adjustable FPR or boost dependant? Then you've got the ignition factor which plays another huge role in this. Stock coils or aftermarket, ignition amplifier or not? There has got to be one way of seting up a fuel system that is superior to the rest. I'm looking to produce 500hp. I think I'll need 850 primaries and 1600 secondaries, probably two fuel pumps, and a different FPR. Anyone out there who really knows what they're talking about when it comes to fuel systems? Thanks.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 04:12 PM
  #2  
Trevor's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, AZ. USA
Seems like people go overboard on fueling alot on this board.

550 primaries (stock)
+ 1300 secondaries (drop in - still in the stock rail)
+ Adjustable fuel pressure regulator set at 49 psi base
+ One Walbro 255HP pump with a 10 gauge power system straight off the battery or alternator

= 500 flywheel HP at 80% IDC at 0.6 BSFC (likely) & 86.3% IDC at 0.65 BSFC (unlikely)

Now watch...somebody is going to come in here and reccomend something nutty like 1000cc primaries, 1680cc secondaries, and dual pumps just because it sounds cool and "you might need it later."
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 04:15 PM
  #3  
mjw's Avatar
mjw
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,033
Likes: 1
From: LostAngeles
http://www.maxcooper.com/rx7/how-to/...tem/calcs.html
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 07:20 PM
  #4  
Crazy_Jake's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 373
Likes: 0
From: Clovis, NM
Originally Posted by Trevor
Seems like people go overboard on fueling alot on this board.

550 primaries (stock)
+ 1300 secondaries (drop in - still in the stock rail)
+ Adjustable fuel pressure regulator set at 49 psi base
+ One Walbro 255HP pump with a 10 gauge power system straight off the battery or alternator

= 500 flywheel HP at 80% IDC at 0.6 BSFC (likely) & 86.3% IDC at 0.65 BSFC (unlikely)

Now watch...somebody is going to come in here and reccomend something nutty like 1000cc primaries, 1680cc secondaries, and dual pumps just because it sounds cool and "you might need it later."
According to the calculator provided by the above post, your setup would equate to 423hp at the wheels. I wonder how accurate that calculator is.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 07:37 PM
  #5  
dubulup's Avatar
development
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 5,714
Likes: 7
From: Lafayette, LA
423rwhp ~ 497hp

I did what Trevor recommended against.

upgraded secondary rail with 1680cc injectors (removed ACV)
Modded primary for AN fittings with 550cc injectors (removed OMP)
FPR base 40psi

~71% duty cycle at 17psi of boost. which by the calculator I'm making in the ball park of 480hp
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2005 | 04:21 AM
  #6  
jacobcartmill's Avatar
just dont care.
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 9,387
Likes: 4
From: Nashville, TN
people get topfeed 1680 secondaries because they are cheap...
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2005 | 08:41 AM
  #7  
dubulup's Avatar
development
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 5,714
Likes: 7
From: Lafayette, LA
Originally Posted by jacobcartmill
people get topfeed 1680 secondaries because they are cheap...
and you'll never have to upgrade fuel again...I don't have any plans for 550rwhp
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2005 | 11:00 AM
  #8  
Crazy_Jake's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 373
Likes: 0
From: Clovis, NM
Originally Posted by dubulup
423rwhp ~ 497hp

I did what Trevor recommended against.

upgraded secondary rail with 1680cc injectors (removed ACV)
Modded primary for AN fittings with 550cc injectors (removed OMP)
FPR base 40psi

~71% duty cycle at 17psi of boost. which by the calculator I'm making in the ball park of 480hp

I forgot what the ACV is an what is does. Air Control Valve maybe? Just wondering what affect removing the Oil Metering Pump has on your primary injectors. And is that an aftermarket FPR set to 40 psi? Thanks.
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2005 | 01:00 PM
  #9  
rynberg's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 10
From: San Lorenzo, California
Originally Posted by Crazy_Jake
Just wondering what affect removing the Oil Metering Pump has on your primary injectors.
HUH?

The OMP supplies lubricating/cooling oil to the interior of the motor....and has nothing whatsover to do with the primary injectors. One things' for sure, if you remove the OMP, you won't NEED an upgraded fuel system.....
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2005 | 07:10 PM
  #10  
dubulup's Avatar
development
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 5,714
Likes: 7
From: Lafayette, LA
Originally Posted by rynberg
One things' for sure, if you remove the OMP, you won't NEED an upgraded fuel system.....

no, but you do have to remove the OMP nozzles to fit AN fittings on the primary rail...I didn't explain that well, sorry for the confusion.

ACV is the secondary air injection for the air pump/emissions...sometimes port air gets sent to the air pump. I forget all the specifics now.

here is the only pic I could find, showing both...


I didn't really want the OMP lubricating my motor anyway...since I was going to be pushing a lot more air than stock.
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2005 | 08:49 PM
  #11  
Crazy_Jake's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 373
Likes: 0
From: Clovis, NM
Originally Posted by dubulup
no, but you do have to remove the OMP nozzles to fit AN fittings on the primary rail...I didn't explain that well, sorry for the confusion.

ACV is the secondary air injection for the air pump/emissions...sometimes port air gets sent to the air pump. I forget all the specifics now.

I didn't really want the OMP lubricating my motor anyway...since I was going to be pushing a lot more air than stock.

Ok, thanks for explaining the OMP thing. I was wondering how the injectors had anything to do with that. I have a block-off plate kit that I never installed. Doesn't that include one for the ACV? Also, I will be removing the OMP and running pre-mix. I believe in eliminating all possible points of failure and excess bs. Try and get it as simple as possible.
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2005 | 11:16 PM
  #12  
dubulup's Avatar
development
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 5,714
Likes: 7
From: Lafayette, LA
Originally Posted by Crazy_Jake
Doesn't that include one for the ACV?

sometimes...its a very trianglular looking plate...I had to order it separate.

it's a good idea to remove, especially if you are aiming for 500hp.
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2005 | 09:52 PM
  #13  
Indian's Avatar
It wasn't me!!
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,189
Likes: 0
From: Cayman Islands
Anyone got any better pics of the fuel system setup. eg.Kgparts fuel setup?
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2005 | 11:42 PM
  #14  
jacobcartmill's Avatar
just dont care.
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 9,387
Likes: 4
From: Nashville, TN
jake, you be crazy
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2005 | 01:48 PM
  #15  
NewbernD's Avatar
Tequila? ..it's like beer
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,124
Likes: 0
From: Woodbine, MD
Originally Posted by dubulup
no, but you do have to remove the OMP nozzles to fit AN fittings on the primary rail...I didn't explain that well, sorry for the confusion.
Actually, if you use 45 degree fittings you there is no need to remove the OMP nozzles.

Reply
Old Jan 2, 2006 | 05:31 AM
  #16  
HDP's Avatar
HDP
A Fistfull of Dollars!
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 5,322
Likes: 6
From: HuntsVEGAS, AL
Any more pics?
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2006 | 12:46 PM
  #17  
NewbernD's Avatar
Tequila? ..it's like beer
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,124
Likes: 0
From: Woodbine, MD
Originally Posted by HDP
Any more pics?
If you're asking me, there are a few here:

http://dave.newbern.org/gallery/album01?page=7

though you can't see much of the plumbing of the primaries or the OMP jets.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
82streetracer
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
7
Aug 23, 2015 09:28 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:21 PM.