3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Aluminum Flywheel WTF?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 22, 2007 | 11:16 PM
  #1  
rxcited2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Magnet Boy
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 251
Likes: 1
From: NorCal
Question Aluminum Flywheel WTF?

Just received my long awaited high performance lightweight aluminum flywheel for my FD to be used with an ACT XT clutch. The flywheel utilizes a replaceable friction surface. When I handed it to my mechanic, he said WTF? How come this surface isn't machined? It is clearly a rough stock finish. The texture appears to have pores on the order of 5 to 10 mils deep.

I discussed this with the vendor (who shall remain nameless for the time being) who explained that all of their flywheels look like this. I said WTF? every flywheel I've ever seen has a machined surface. I expected this surface as delivered to be turned on a lathe or ground. My mechanic and I are concerned that this will eat the hell out of my clutch disk while causing overheating, hot spots, chattering, etc. The vendor said they've always made them this way and it is completely normal and not a problem.

My mechanic purchased the same exact setup approximately four years ago. He noticed that his friction plate has 10 fasteners while mine has 16 fasteners. Apparently they have made changes over the years. My mechanic still has in hand the original friction plate from four years ago (since replaced) and this original plate appears to be machined has he rememered it was when he got it. About a year ago, he bought a new friction plate from the same vendor and remembers the same quality machined surface, unlike mine.

What do you think? See attach photos of the replaceable friction surface from my flywheel. I have attempted to highlight the texture of the surface with side lighting. #1 overall plate, #2 close up of front surface, #3 front surface showing scale, #4 rear surface.







Attached Thumbnails Aluminum Flywheel WTF?-friction_surface_overall.jpg   Aluminum Flywheel WTF?-front_closeup.jpg   Aluminum Flywheel WTF?-front_scale.jpg   Aluminum Flywheel WTF?-rear_scale.jpg  
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2007 | 12:27 AM
  #2  
Aeka GSR's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,179
Likes: 31
From: Riverside, CA
is that replacement peice aluminum too? If not i would imagine it wouldnt be machined.
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2007 | 12:38 AM
  #3  
mono4lamar's Avatar
In the burnout box...
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (32)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,453
Likes: 2
From: New York
looks completely normal to me... its the fidanza flywheel right? i have a fidanza on my fd and it looked the same as the last one on my mx6. its just the way the replacement friction surface looks.
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2007 | 02:00 AM
  #4  
rxcited2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Magnet Boy
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 251
Likes: 1
From: NorCal
Originally Posted by Aeka GSR
is that replacement peice aluminum too? If not i would imagine it wouldnt be machined.
The replaceable friction surface appears to be made of some kind of steel. The vendor claimed "high carbon steel." It just seems like the surface that engages the clutch disk ought to be smooth and flat. It is flat in an overall sense - running an indicator on it suggests it is basically parallel to the aluminum flywheel itself. But the SURFACE is porous with "nooks and crannies" that are 5 to 10 thousands of an inch deep.

The odd thing is the way the vendor claims "we've always made them this way" and "we have probably thousands in service and they are all like this" whereas my mechanic's friction plate from one year ago seemed to be machined. The vendor seems to be either lying or intentionally misrepresenting what is going on. Maybe the vendor has made a change to reduce the cost based on a theory that the unmachined surface is FINE. OK. But why not say so? Why claim "we always made them this way" if in fact this is not true (since they used to be machined)?

Most steel or chromemoly flywheels are cast or forged and then turned on a lathe, so of course the friction surface will be a flat machined surface, just like a brake rotor. The question I am posing to the Rx-7 community here is: should a replaceable steel friction surface on an aluminum flywheel also be machined? Or is it OK that is kind of rough? Will this extra roughness result in undue and premature wear and tear on the clutch disk?
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2007 | 02:05 AM
  #5  
rxcited2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Magnet Boy
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 251
Likes: 1
From: NorCal
Originally Posted by mono4lamar
looks completely normal to me... its the fidanza flywheel right? i have a fidanza on my fd and it looked the same as the last one on my mx6. its just the way the replacement friction surface looks.
NO. This is NOT a Fidanza flywheel.

But this raises exactly the information I want to see:

Is this how a Fidanza aluminum flywheel replaceable friction surface looks?

Is this how a Racing Beat aluminum flywheel replaceable friciton surface looks?
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2007 | 07:44 AM
  #6  
tmiked's Avatar
Waiting for the RX-9
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 957
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Looks to me like someone just decided to save on manufacturing costs.
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2007 | 08:34 AM
  #7  
Chadwick's Avatar
Mr Sparkles
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 785
Likes: 1
From: Smyrna, TN, USA
This is normal for a replacement surface, it just needs to be mounted up and turned. The reason for this it to compensate for the variances of each flywheel. If they sent it to you pre machined it would not be true and you would not get the best mating surface for the clutch disk.

Hope this helps,
Dan
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2007 | 08:52 AM
  #8  
nashman69g's Avatar
Boost Addict
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,898
Likes: 13
From: Metairie, LA near new orleans
Originally Posted by Chadwick
This is normal for a replacement surface, it just needs to be mounted up and turned. The reason for this it to compensate for the variances of each flywheel. If they sent it to you pre machined it would not be true and you would not get the best mating surface for the clutch disk.

Hope this helps,
Dan
That make sense..."I see now" said the blind man.
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2007 | 09:19 AM
  #9  
rxcited2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Magnet Boy
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 251
Likes: 1
From: NorCal
Originally Posted by tmiked
Looks to me like someone just decided to save on manufacturing costs.
Agreed. But then why misrepresent this fact? How about saying "yeah, we used to machine them, but we found the stock material was flat enough and the extra machining was not required." I might disagree or object to this, but at least it would be honest instead of saying "we always made them this way".
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2007 | 09:22 AM
  #10  
rxcited2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Magnet Boy
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 251
Likes: 1
From: NorCal
Originally Posted by Chadwick
This is normal for a replacement surface, it just needs to be mounted up and turned. The reason for this it to compensate for the variances of each flywheel. If they sent it to you pre machined it would not be true and you would not get the best mating surface for the clutch disk.

Hope this helps,
Dan
Dan,

THIS IS NOT A REPLACEMENT INSERT. THIS IS A BRAND NEW FLYWHEEL. IT CAME LIKE THIS. I removed the insert so I could inspect the back side and so I could show pictures without revealing the vendor. I wanted an unbiased opinion.

I agree the new insert ought to be installed on the flywheel and THEN turned, right? That is what I am going to do. This vendor is claiming I ought to just throw it on there AS IS and let my new clutch wear away the stock rough surface. WTF?
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2007 | 10:13 AM
  #11  
nashman69g's Avatar
Boost Addict
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,898
Likes: 13
From: Metairie, LA near new orleans
Originally Posted by rxcited2
Dan,

THIS IS NOT A REPLACEMENT INSERT. THIS IS A BRAND NEW FLYWHEEL. IT CAME LIKE THIS. I removed the insert so I could inspect the back side and so I could show pictures without revealing the vendor. I wanted an unbiased opinion.

I agree the new insert ought to be installed on the flywheel and THEN turned, right? That is what I am going to do. This vendor is claiming I ought to just throw it on there AS IS and let my new clutch wear away the stock rough surface. WTF?
Yes, install the insert then turn it. If you put the insert on as is, your new clutch might not wear right or wear out prematurely. I think the vendor might not understand clutches from the mechanical stand point. Either that or he's trying to mislead you IMHO.
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2007 | 10:41 AM
  #12  
rynberg's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 10
From: San Lorenzo, California
My new SR Motorsports flywheel with the insert did NOT look like that, it was machined.
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2007 | 10:47 AM
  #13  
rxcited2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Magnet Boy
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 251
Likes: 1
From: NorCal
Originally Posted by rynberg
My new SR Motorsports flywheel with the insert did NOT look like that, it was machined.
Good info dude. When did you get it?
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2007 | 10:58 AM
  #14  
rynberg's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 10
From: San Lorenzo, California
mid 05
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2007 | 11:03 AM
  #15  
DamonB's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,617
Likes: 8
From: Dallas
Originally Posted by Chadwick
This is normal for a replacement surface, it just needs to be mounted up and turned.
Yeah; just turn it. Costs little and you'll be all fixed up. I wouldn't run that "raw" either, it would eat clutch discs much faster.
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2007 | 11:10 AM
  #16  
rxcited2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Magnet Boy
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 251
Likes: 1
From: NorCal
Agreed ^ it needs to be mounted and turned. But is it right that a new flywheel ought to come this way? Is it right that the vendor lied about changes to the way he ships his flywheels? Is it right that the vendor suggests to use it AS IS?
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2007 | 11:14 AM
  #17  
b@@sted_fd's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
From: Calgary, AB, Canada
Originally Posted by rxcited2
NO. This is NOT a Fidanza flywheel.

But this raises exactly the information I want to see:

Is this how a Fidanza aluminum flywheel replaceable friction surface looks?

Is this how a Racing Beat aluminum flywheel replaceable friciton surface looks?

nope. my racing beat insert was smooth not all pitted like that one...
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2007 | 11:25 AM
  #18  
nashman69g's Avatar
Boost Addict
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,898
Likes: 13
From: Metairie, LA near new orleans
Originally Posted by rxcited2
Agreed ^ it needs to be mounted and turned. But is it right that a new flywheel ought to come this way? Is it right that the vendor lied about changes to the way he ships his flywheels? Is it right that the vendor suggests to use it AS IS?
The vendor should not suggest to use it as is! If the vendor states that the flywheel comes unmachined, then yes, it's right; but in your case, he's saying it's supposed to be that way, is not right!
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2007 | 11:25 AM
  #19  
Chadwick's Avatar
Mr Sparkles
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 785
Likes: 1
From: Smyrna, TN, USA
Originally Posted by rxcited2
Dan,

THIS IS NOT A REPLACEMENT INSERT. THIS IS A BRAND NEW FLYWHEEL. IT CAME LIKE THIS. I removed the insert so I could inspect the back side and so I could show pictures without revealing the vendor. I wanted an unbiased opinion.

I agree the new insert ought to be installed on the flywheel and THEN turned, right? That is what I am going to do. This vendor is claiming I ought to just throw it on there AS IS and let my new clutch wear away the stock rough surface. WTF?
Ahh, yes if it is a complete new flywheel it should of come turned already.
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2007 | 11:26 AM
  #20  
DamonB's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,617
Likes: 8
From: Dallas
Originally Posted by rxcited2
This vendor is claiming I ought to just throw it on there AS IS and let my new clutch wear away the stock rough surface. WTF?
I'd agree with you if you claim they're nuts
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2007 | 03:26 PM
  #23  
mb7's Avatar
mb7
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
From: Greenwood, SC
When I got my replacement friction surface from racing beat it definitely did not look like that. It was machined on both sides.
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2007 | 09:40 PM
  #24  
Svelte_7's Avatar
Back on the road again!
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 447
Likes: 1
From: Bay Area
The surface finish of that replacement disc doesn't look right.

Pics of the Racing Beat Flywheel I installed last October:
Attached Thumbnails Aluminum Flywheel WTF?-racing-beat-flywheel_1.jpg   Aluminum Flywheel WTF?-racing-beat-flywheel_2.jpg   Aluminum Flywheel WTF?-racing-beat-flywheel_3.jpg   Aluminum Flywheel WTF?-racing-beat-flywheel_mounted_front.jpg   Aluminum Flywheel WTF?-racing-beat-flywheel_mounted__top.jpg  


Last edited by Svelte_7; Mar 23, 2007 at 10:05 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2007 | 10:03 PM
  #25  
radkins's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,236
Likes: 1
From: Waiting for Indykid to catch up
That flywheeel doesn't look right. I would send it back. So who made it?
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:58 AM.