3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Aftermarket/ Relocated IAT sensor?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 16, 2010 | 04:40 PM
  #26  
Speed of light's Avatar
Form follows function
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,231
Likes: 47
From: Now in Arizona
I devised an easy method to use the fast acting GM IAT sensor in place of the stock one--simply by shunting it with with a 12K ohm resistor. (shunting means wiring in parallel) It will then track within the specifications for the stock mazda sensor. In practical application, you can use a common 10k ohm resistor with good results; especially if it is in the Greddy elbow such as mine is. Using a 10k ohm resistor in shunt will tend to make IAT read a touch warmer than it is, helping to compensate for its relocation into the elbow.

This allows peeps with a stock ecu to run the GM sensor or to use mazda sensor settings for aftermarket controllers. The GM sensor threads in using a common 3/8" pipe tap, so installing it in alternate locations could be more convenient than the OEM type for some.
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2010 | 07:30 PM
  #27  
cosmo105's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
From: boise, id
I run the "dude" iat sensor with the supplied pigtail and have noticed a major difference in sensitivity (factory position). Looking forward to seeing what it does when I install my meth system.
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2010 | 09:35 PM
  #28  
mefarri's Avatar
Thread Starter
Get some
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 680
Likes: 1
From: Arkansas
Originally Posted by Speed of light
I devised an easy method to use the fast acting GM IAT sensor in place of the stock one--simply by shunting it with with a 12K ohm resistor. (shunting means wiring in parallel) It will then track within the specifications for the stock mazda sensor. In practical application, you can use a common 10k ohm resistor with good results; especially if it is in the Greddy elbow such as mine is. Using a 10k ohm resistor in shunt will tend to make IAT read a touch warmer than it is, helping to compensate for its relocation into the elbow.

This allows peeps with a stock ecu to run the GM sensor or to use mazda sensor settings for aftermarket controllers. The GM sensor threads in using a common 3/8" pipe tap, so installing it in alternate locations could be more convenient than the OEM type for some.
My thoughts exactly. So apparently there's no calibration INSIDE the PFC so you have to make it at the sensor.

I pmed the "dude" and he said he had tested this sensor and right out of the box it fell within the voltage/temperature parameters the stock one did and that someone named Sandro did some testing at various temperatures and found the fast iat to be extremely close in calibrations to the stock sensor.

Does anyone know where those threads are? I couldn't find them. thanks!
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2010 | 09:52 PM
  #29  
Sgtblue's Avatar
Urban Combat Vet
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 12,160
Likes: 983
From: Mid-west
Originally Posted by mefarri
I did do my research and found nothing other than what is mostly put here. No data, just "yea it reacts faster." Data without structure or reference points is meaningless.
-----> https://www.rx7club.com/showthread.p...&highlight=IAT
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2010 | 10:50 PM
  #30  
mefarri's Avatar
Thread Starter
Get some
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 680
Likes: 1
From: Arkansas
sweet. thanks for that.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rotor_veux
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
7
Sep 19, 2015 07:13 PM
msilvia
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
15
Sep 11, 2015 12:13 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:04 AM.