3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

ABS and Power Steering for Track Car?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 8, 2014 | 02:24 AM
  #1  
AX75F92's Avatar
Thread Starter
Friday Night Nitrous Fire
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 390
Likes: 13
From: Anaheim
ABS and Power Steering for Track Car?

Im in the process of building a dedicated time attack FD and wondering what those of you who track regularly have to say about ABS and power steering. I know ABS is a great tool on modern sports cars but considering the system on the FD was designed using 20 year old technology Im not sure if its up to the task or even safe for serious track use.

For depowering the rack Im talking about removing the internal seals and welding the quill...not just looping the line.

Your thoughts and insight are always appreciated.

Cheers.
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2014 | 06:26 AM
  #2  
oyvindjs's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 10 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
From: Bergen, Norway
Ive done the powersteering depowering thing. Opened the rack, removed valves etc. The feel is amazing! And since the car is so light and rwd, my 245 fronts doesnt feel like handling a truck, even on standstill. Once you are rolling, you can steer with one finger.
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2014 | 06:51 AM
  #3  
Spalato's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,274
Likes: 178
From: US/EU
Originally Posted by oyvindjs
Ive done the powersteering depowering thing. Opened the rack, removed valves etc. The feel is amazing! And since the car is so light and rwd, my 245 fronts doesnt feel like handling a truck, even on standstill. Once you are rolling, you can steer with one finger.
Thats good to hear, been thinking of going manual steering for a while now.
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2014 | 07:36 AM
  #4  
Kman Art's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
From: Cayman Islands
I've done both.

Depowering the rack was definitely the right move. I ran my car in a very tight autocross event without any issues.

As for deleting the abs, with only one event without it, I haven't had much chance to dial in the brake bias. As soon as I have a lil more seat time in the car and get things adjusted, I'm sure I will be happy.

My car is a JDM '92 FD and everything was in need of replace/repair when I got it 4 years ago. Just can't bring myself to deleting the AC just yet
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2014 | 02:51 PM
  #5  
ArmitageGVR4's Avatar
ArmitageFD3S
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,247
Likes: 26
From: Herndon, Virginia
I've found that the factory ABS is a liability when you're in a spin on-track or on the skidpad. The stopping distance with both feet in is much much higher when ABS kicks on than it is when the system is disabled. I haven't gotten around to it yet but I plan on removing the system completely, even if it means fabbing up all the required hard lines to do it. There are kits available to buy that are braided lines but I'm not a fan of that idea.
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2014 | 07:28 PM
  #6  
Mitchocalypse's Avatar
Brap..
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 449
Likes: 1
From: Alberta, Canada
Definitely de-power the rack. I can honestly say I prefer driving without power steering in these cars.

ABS.. Someone local was telling me that deleting it gave much better stopping distances but ate through tires much faster. Seems obvious but might be something that could be easily overlooked
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2014 | 10:25 PM
  #7  
gracer7-rx7's Avatar
needs more track time
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,767
Likes: 797
From: Bay Area CA
I prefer to have both on a dual duty car.

Personally, I'd leave it until you notice that it is a liability on track. I've known a few people from the older club days that wound up adding the PS back later on. ABS is helpful in the wet.
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2014 | 09:26 AM
  #8  
ArmitageGVR4's Avatar
ArmitageFD3S
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,247
Likes: 26
From: Herndon, Virginia
^^ I added PS back after I had installed a Maval depowered rack. It was fine on the track, but it was a pain in the **** around town. I have some unresolved caster issues on the D-F side that in conjunction with wider tires and a smaller steering wheel may have added to the low speed steering effort. Gotta sort that out with some new bushings/eccentric bolts this season I think.
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2014 | 10:30 AM
  #9  
Smokey The Talon's Avatar
Long time on-looker
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 886
Likes: 50
From: Columbus, OH
Originally Posted by ArmitageGVR4
I've found that the factory ABS is a liability when you're in a spin on-track or on the skidpad. The stopping distance with both feet in is much much higher when ABS kicks on than it is when the system is disabled. I haven't gotten around to it yet but I plan on removing the system completely, even if it means fabbing up all the required hard lines to do it. There are kits available to buy that are braided lines but I'm not a fan of that idea.
Thanks for your input. I haven't run into those situations with ABS on my track car, but I'll keep an eye out for it. I run NT-01s and DTC-60 pads (aftermarket front brakes) and have found that the ABS isn't very intrusive and will allow a very slight amount of lockup. Could also be the 20yr old ABS just can't keep up, but I haven't found a need to get rid of it yet other than I'd like to be able to dial in more rear bias.

I've tracked my car with a looped line steering rack for a number of years. Like Matthew, I considered going back to P/S a while back since I run a 330mm wheel to give me as much leg room as possible. I decided against it, but will be doing the full manual conversion later this year to hopefully reach a compromise.
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2014 | 02:05 PM
  #10  
Narfle's Avatar
Rx7 Wagon
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 6,978
Likes: 888
From: California
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by gracer7-rx7
i prefer to have both on a dual duty car.

Personally, i'd leave it until you notice that it is a liability on track. I've known a few people from the older club days that wound up adding the ps back later on. Abs is helpful in the wet.
qft
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2014 | 07:17 PM
  #11  
AX75F92's Avatar
Thread Starter
Friday Night Nitrous Fire
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 390
Likes: 13
From: Anaheim
Thank you for the great input guys. As usual, it seems much of the decision boils down to personal preference. However, ABS issues in a spin situation are interesting and something to consider. It seems most are quite happy with manual steering on the track, so I am leaning towards depowering the rack.
Still undecided on the ABS...Im running Stoptech 4 pot with 13" rotors up front and stock rear.
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2014 | 11:57 AM
  #12  
Smokey The Talon's Avatar
Long time on-looker
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 886
Likes: 50
From: Columbus, OH
I run Wilwood 4-piston front calipers on 13" rotors up front and stock rear all pushed by a 929 M/C. I've found that the stock ABS is still pretty "loose" with regard to kicking in and will allow me to have some slight lockup.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
LunchboxCritter
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
15
Jan 3, 2016 04:11 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:02 AM.